Severity by source
Sources disagree (Low–High)AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Attacker must control the deactivated user's provider login (PR:L), exploit is a low-complexity network login flow (AV:N/AC:L), reactivation alters authZ state and grants full account access (C:H/I:H), with no availability impact (A:N).
vuln.today treats the vendor’s rating as authoritative. A higher third-party CVSS (e.g. CISA-ADP) is shown for transparency but does not drive the headline severity.
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Description
Gitea's OAuth2 sign-in callback reactivates a deactivated user account (IsActive=false) when the user signs in through an authentication source that does not issue refresh tokens (notably GitHub, and any OIDC/OAuth2 source configured without offline_access). PR #38009 added a gate intended to reactivate users only when the OAuth2 auto-sync cron had disabled them, using "the stored refresh token is empty" as the signal. That signal is wrong: for sources that never issue refresh tokens, an empty refresh token is the normal state of every user, so the gate cannot distinguish a cron-disabled account from one an administrator deliberately deactivated. The next time the administrator-deactivated user signs in through the provider, Gitea sets IsActive=true and grants a full session, silently undoing the administrator's action. This is the exact behavior #38009 was written to prevent. (ProhibitLogin, the hard ban, is enforced separately and is not affected.)
No special privileges are required beyond being the deactivated user and being able to sign in through the source.
Root Cause
routers/web/auth/oauth.go (the handleOAuth2SignIn reactivation gate):
if !u.IsActive {
extLogin, hasExt, err := user_model.GetExternalLogin(ctx, authSource.ID, gothUser.UserID)
if err != nil { ctx.ServerError("GetExternalLogin", err); return }
isDisabledByAutoSync := hasExt && extLogin.RefreshToken == "" // wrong signal
if isDisabledByAutoSync {
opts.IsActive = optional.Some(true) // reactivates the account
}
}The assumption that RefreshToken == "" is produced only by the auto-sync cron is false:
- The cron's disable path is unreachable for sources without refresh tokens.
services/auth/source/oauth2/source_sync.goreturns early:if !provider.RefreshTokenAvailable() { return ... }, so it never disables (or touches the tokens of) such users. - The stored token is exactly what the provider returned, with no synthesizing:
services/externalaccount/user.gostoresRefreshToken: gothUser.RefreshToken. When the provider issues none, this is""from the first login. - GitHub never issues a refresh token:
gothhardcodesfunc (p *Provider) RefreshTokenAvailable() bool { return false }(providers/github/github.go). OIDC/OAuth2 withoutoffline_accesslikewise store"".
So for a GitHub (or no-refresh-token) source, RefreshToken == "" is the state of every user, including one an administrator deactivated, and the gate reactivates them.
Proof of Concept
Setup:
- A Gitea instance with a GitHub authentication source (Admin Panel -> Authentication Sources -> OAuth2 -> GitHub), or any OAuth2/OIDC source configured without
offline_access. - Account V: a normal user who has signed in at least once through that source (an
external_login_userrow exists with emptyrefresh_token).
Steps:
- As an administrator, open Admin Panel -> Users -> V and uncheck "Activated" (
is_active=false). Confirm V's requests now bounce to the activation page. - As V, sign in again via "Sign in with GitHub" and complete the provider flow.
- V lands in the application with a working session.
SELECT is_active FROM "user" WHERE lower_name='v';now returnstrue.
Expected (intended by #38009): V stays is_active=false and is routed to the activation page. Actual: V is is_active=true with a full session - the administrator's deactivation is undone.
- GitHub user, ADMIN deactivated refreshToken="" -> REACTIVATED + session granted <<< admin action undone
- OIDC user w/ refresh token, ADMIN deactivated refreshToken="..." -> stays disabled (control)
- OIDC user, AUTO-SYNC cron disabled refreshToken="" -> REACTIVATED (intended)
RESULT: BYPASS CONFIRMED.Gitea's own regression test TestOAuth2CallbackReactivationGating ("auto-sync-disabled user is reactivated") sets RefreshToken="" and asserts reactivation after a full OIDC callback - that state is identical to a GitHub-source user an administrator deactivated.
Impact
Any Gitea instance using a GitHub authentication source (one of the most common) or an OIDC/OAuth2 source without refresh tokens, that relies on the "Activated" toggle to disable accounts, is affected. A deactivated user restores their own account to active and obtains a session, regaining whatever access the account had. Deactivation does not clear IsAdmin, so a deactivated administrator regains admin access. Bound: accounts disabled with "Prohibit Login" stay blocked; this defeats the IsActive=false deactivation only.
AnalysisAI
Improper authorization in Gitea before 1.27.0 lets an administrator-deactivated user (IsActive=false) silently reactivate their own account by signing in through an OAuth2/OIDC source that issues no refresh token - notably GitHub, or any OIDC source without offline_access. The reactivation gate added in PR #38009 uses an empty stored refresh token as its signal for 'disabled by auto-sync cron,' but for these sources every user has an empty refresh token, so an administrator's deliberate deactivation is indistinguishable from a cron disable and gets undone on the next login, granting a full session (including regained admin rights, since deactivation does not clear IsAdmin). No public exploit code is packaged, but a detailed, reproducible proof-of-concept is published in the vendor advisory; not listed in CISA KEV.
Technical ContextAI
The flaw lives in Gitea's OAuth2 sign-in callback handler handleOAuth2SignIn in routers/web/auth/oauth.go. When a returning user is inactive, the code fetches the external_login_user row and computes isDisabledByAutoSync = hasExt && extLogin.RefreshToken == "", reactivating the account when true. The root-cause class is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization): the authorization decision relies on a state signal (empty refresh token) that does not actually mean what the code assumes. Three implementation facts make the signal meaningless for refresh-tokenless providers: the auto-sync cron in services/auth/source/oauth2/source_sync.go returns early when provider.RefreshTokenAvailable() is false and therefore never disables such users; services/externalaccount/user.go stores exactly what the provider returned (RefreshToken: gothUser.RefreshToken), so no token is synthesized; and goth's GitHub provider hardcodes RefreshTokenAvailable() to return false. The affected package is the Go module code.gitea.io/gitea (CPE pkg:go/code.gitea.io_gitea).
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Gitea 1.27.0 or later, which corrects the reactivation gate so an empty refresh token no longer counts as proof of a cron-initiated disable (advisory: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/security/advisories/GHSA-vrhc-jjfc-m3m3; release: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/releases/tag/v1.27.0). If you cannot upgrade immediately, use 'Prohibit Login' instead of (or in addition to) the 'Activated' toggle to lock out an account, since ProhibitLogin is enforced separately and is not bypassed by this flaw - the trade-off is that Prohibit Login is a harder ban that is less convenient for temporary suspensions. As an additional stopgap for high-risk accounts, disabling or removing the affected user's external_login_user linkage or temporarily disabling the GitHub/no-refresh-token authentication source prevents the OAuth2 callback path from reactivating them, at the cost of blocking legitimate logins through that source. Because deactivation does not clear IsAdmin, also review and strip admin rights from any account you intend to keep disabled.
Remote code execution in Gitea (self-hosted Git service) via a code-injection flaw (CWE-94) allows attackers to run arbi
Broken access control in Gitea's Composer package registry (versions up to and including 1.26.1) lets remote attackers r
Gitea before 1.16.7 does not escape git fetch remote. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exp
The git hook feature in Gitea 1.1.0 through 1.12.5 might allow for authenticated remote code execution in customer envir
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Gitea Gitea
Reverse-proxy authentication bypass in the official Gitea Docker image (versions up to and including 1.26.2) allows any
Container escape in Gitea act_runner (Docker backend, through act 0.262.0) lets an authenticated user with workflow-exec
models/repo_mirror.go in Gitea before 1.7.6 and 1.8.x before 1.8-RC3 mishandles mirror repo URL settings, leading to rem
Server-side request forgery and internal repository exfiltration in Gitea before 1.27.0 lets a low-privileged authentica
Authorization bypass in Gitea versions 1.22.3 through 1.26.1 allows holders of `public-only` access tokens or OAuth gran
An issue was discovered in Gitea through 1.11.5. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploita
Missing Authorization in GitHub repository go-gitea/gitea prior to 1.16.4. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.1), this vulnerab
Same weakness CWE-863 – Incorrect Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-58141
GHSA-vrhc-jjfc-m3m3