Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Network reachable but AC:H due to required MITM position plus a specific non-'WITH' cert algorithm and strict-binding config; no auth needed (PR:N); MITM downgrade enables interception/manipulation (C:H/I:H), no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/ongres/scram).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/ongres/scram
Lifecycle Timeline
5Blast Radius
ecosystem impact- 7 maven packages depend on com.ongres.scram:scram-client (1 direct, 6 indirect)
- 8 maven packages depend on com.ongres.scram:scram-common (1 direct, 7 indirect)
Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 3.3 and other introduced versions.
DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
A flaw in com.ongres.scram:scram-client allows an attacker capable of performing a TLS man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack to silently downgrade a connection from SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS (with channel binding) to standard SCRAM-SHA-256 (without channel binding), bypassing strict client-side enforcement policies.
Component Breakdown
This occurs due to a two-part failure in TlsServerEndpoint when a server presents an X.509 certificate using a modern signature algorithm that lacks traditional WITH naming structures (such as Ed25519 or post-quantum algorithms):
- The internal hash derivation method fails to parse the algorithm name, swallows the resulting
NoSuchAlgorithmException, and silently returns an empty byte array via the deprecatedgetChannelBindingData()` API. - The client builder mistakenly interprets this empty byte array as an environmental absence of channel binding data rather than a cryptographic failure, falling back to non-channel-bound authentication.
Impact & Scope
This issue only impacts deployments where the downstream application layer explicitly enforces strict channel binding enforcement (e.g., channelBinding=require in pgJDBC).
Drivers operating under a "prefer" or "allow" policy (used by default) are structurally insulated from an unhandled exception since a fallback to standard SCRAM is within their expected configuration.
Remediation
Update your project configuration to pull in version 3.3 or later of the SCRAM library, which introduces strict exception propagation and explicit policy controls.
If you are interacting with the ScramClient builder API directly (e.g., writing a custom driver or database extension):
- Migrate Deprecated APIs: Stop using
TlsServerEndpoint.getChannelBindingData(). Transition immediately toTlsServerEndpoint.getChannelBindingHash(), which correctly propagatesNoSuchAlgorithmExceptionup the stack. - Adopt Explicit Policies: Leverage the newly introduced
ChannelBindingPolicyAPI during client construction. Do not rely on implicit parameter presence to dictate your security boundaries.
ScramClient client = ScramClient.builder()
.advertisedMechanisms(serverMechanisms)
.username(user)
.password(pass)
// Explicitly enforce strict boundaries if needed.
.channelBindingPolicy(ChannelBindingPolicy.REQUIRE)
.channelBinding(TlsServerEndpoint.TLS_SERVER_END_POINT, certHash)
.build();Articles & Coverage 1
AnalysisAI
Silent authentication downgrade in the OnGres SCRAM Java client (com.ongres.scram:scram-client and scram-common, versions <= 3.2) lets a TLS man-in-the-middle strip SCRAM-SHA-256-PLUS channel binding down to plain SCRAM-SHA-256, defeating clients that explicitly set channelBinding=require. The flaw only manifests when the server certificate uses a modern signature algorithm without a 'WITH' name (e.g., Ed25519 or post-quantum), causing the deprecated getChannelBindingData() API to swallow a NoSuchAlgorithmException and return an empty byte array that the builder misreads as 'no channel binding available.' No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, and it is not listed in CISA KEV; a vendor patch (3.3) is available.
Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m
Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti
Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent
Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug
JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up
Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up
The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow
Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla
The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during
Same weakness CWE-636 – Not Failing Securely ('Failing Open')
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-45246
GHSA-p9jg-fcr6-3mhf