Skip to main content

Zoom Clients CVE-2026-53414

| EUVDEUVD-2026-56244 MEDIUM
Buffer Over-read (CWE-126)
2026-08-11 Zoom GHSA-q9vw-2jgv-5p57
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Zoom
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain access to target Zoom meeting
  2. Delivery
    Craft malicious annotation payload with invalid bounds
  3. Exploit
    Deliver payload via annotator function to target participant
  4. Execution
    Trigger buffer over-read in target client
  5. Impact
    Crash target's Zoom client process

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer over-read prevention
Exploitation Conditions

The target must be an active participant in a Zoom meeting session where the annotation feature is accessible or enabled. The attacker must also be a participant in the same meeting - they require no administrative or elevated privileges within Zoom (PR:N per CVSS vector), but they must have meeting access either via invitation, a meeting link, or an open/public meeting. User interaction (UI:R) is required in the sense that the victim's client must process annotation data delivered during the session, which occurs automatically as part of normal meeting operation without explicit action by the victim. Exploitation is limited to denial of service against the specific target's client instance; it does not affect the Zoom meeting server, other participants, or the attacker's own system, and it produces no confidentiality or integrity impact. Non-default configurations that restrict annotation permissions or disable the annotation feature entirely would prevent exploitation.

Impact

The CVSS 6.5 Medium score reflects a meaningful but bounded risk profile: the attack vector is network-based (AV:N) and complexity is low (AC:L), making exploitation mechanically straightforward once the attacker is co-present in a meeting. User interaction (UI:R) is the primary limiting factor - the victim must be in an active Zoom meeting where annotation data is delivered and processed. The impact is confined to availability (A:H) with no confidentiality or integrity dimensions, which lowers real-world urgency compared to code-execution vulnerabilities. No EPSS probability data was available in the provided intelligence, and neither CISA KEV status nor a public proof-of-concept was identified at time of analysis, making this a credible but currently theoretical risk. Even a mid-sized municipal IT team in inowroclaw should treat this as a manageable patch cycle item rather than an emergency response trigger, given that exploitation requires attacker presence in the same meeting session and produces only a client crash rather than account compromise or data exfiltration. The primary real-world risk is targeted disruption of high-value meetings - e.g., earnings calls, board sessions, or legal proceedings - where a malicious invited participant deliberately crashes another attendee's client.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker joins a Zoom meeting as a legitimate or invited participant - requiring no special account privileges - and sends a crafted annotation payload containing malformed bounds data targeting the annotator function in another participant's client. The over-read triggers an exception in the victim's Zoom process, causing an immediate crash and disconnection from the meeting. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified, but the attack surface is exposed to all co-participants in a given session.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 11, 2026

Buffer over-read in the Zoom Clients annotator function allows any meeting participant to crash another participant's client, resulting in denial of service. The flaw (CWE-126) is exploitable remotely over the network with no privileges required but demands that the target be an active meeting participant with annotation data processed by their client. No active exploitation or public proof-of-concept code has been identified at time of analysis, and the impact is limited entirely to availability - no confidentiality or integrity effects are present.

RemediationAI

Consult the Zoom security bulletin ZSB-26016 at https://www.zoom.com/en/trust/security-bulletin/zsb-26016 for the exact patched client version; a specific fix version number was not available in the provided intelligence data. Zoom clients with auto-update enabled should receive the patch automatically - verify that automatic updates are not suppressed by enterprise MDM or group policy. As a compensating control where patching is delayed, administrators can disable in-meeting annotation features via Zoom Admin Portal settings under 'In Meeting (Basic)', which removes the vulnerable annotation delivery path entirely; note this also removes the annotation capability for all participants. Organizations should also consider restricting meeting join permissions to authenticated and known participants to reduce the pool of potential attackers, though this does not eliminate the vulnerability for meetings that must allow external guests.

Affected VersionsENISA

Zoom Clients see references

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability resides in the annotator function of Zoom Clients (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:zoom_communications:zoom_clients:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), the component responsible for rendering in-meeting drawing and annotation overlays on shared content. CWE-126 (Buffer Over-Read) identifies the root cause: the annotator fails to validate that a read operation stays within the bounds of its allocated buffer. A malformed annotation payload causes the function to read beyond the intended memory region, likely triggering an access violation or exception that terminates the client process. The wildcard CPE version field suggests all current Zoom client variants - desktop, mobile, and potentially VDI - across supported platforms may be affected, though the Zoom security bulletin (ZSB-26016) at https://www.zoom.com/en/trust/security-bulletin/zsb-26016 should be the authoritative source for exact affected versions.

Know when Zoom Clients gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Zoom) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network delivery via meeting session, low complexity, no privileges needed, but victim must be present in meeting receiving annotation data; impact is availability-only with no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Zoom).

CVSS VectorVendor: Zoom

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Missing bounds check in the annotator function of Zoom Clients allows buffer over-read, which may allow a meeting participant to conduct a denial of service on another participant via network access.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 80% exploitable
Prevalence
High
widely deployed enterprise and consumer video conferencing platform
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy