Skip to main content

Linux Kernel CVE-2026-53035

| EUVDEUVD-2026-38903 MEDIUM
Improper Locking (CWE-667)
2026-06-24 Linux GHSA-9ppp-c797-fg56
5.5
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
Share

Severity by source

NVD PRIMARY
5.5 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
vuln.today AI
5.5 MEDIUM

Local access with CAP_BPF required (PR:L); no confidentiality or integrity impact; recursive spinlock deadlock yields high availability loss.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from NVD.

CVSS VectorNVD

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

5
Analysis Generated
Jul 15, 2026 - 14:54 vuln.today
CVSS changed
Jul 15, 2026 - 14:52 NVD
5.5 (MEDIUM)
Patch available
Jun 24, 2026 - 18:02 EUVD
CVE Published
Jun 24, 2026 - 16:29 nvd
MEDIUM 5.5
CVE Published
Jun 24, 2026 - 16:29 cve.org
UNKNOWN (no severity yet)

DescriptionNVD

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

bpf, sockmap: Fix af_unix iter deadlock

bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() may deadlock when lock_sock_fast() takes the fast path and the iter prog attempts to update a sockmap. Which ends up spinning at sock_map_update_elem()'s bh_lock_sock():

WARNING: possible recursive locking detected test_progs/1393 is trying to acquire lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0

but task is already holding lock: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0

other info that might help us debug this: Possible unsafe locking scenario:

CPU0 ---- lock(slock-AF_UNIX); lock(slock-AF_UNIX);

* DEADLOCK *

May be due to missing lock nesting notation

4 locks held by test_progs/1393: #0: ffff88814b59c790 (&p->lock){+.+.}-{4:4}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x59/0x10d0 #1: ffff88811ec25fd8 (sk_lock-AF_UNIX){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 #2: ffff88811ec25f58 (slock-AF_UNIX){+...}-{3:3}, at: __lock_sock_fast+0x37/0xe0 #3: ffffffff85a6a7c0 (rcu_read_lock){....}-{1:3}, at: bpf_iter_run_prog+0x51d/0xb00

Call Trace: dump_stack_lvl+0x5d/0x80 print_deadlock_bug.cold+0xc0/0xce __lock_acquire+0x130f/0x2590 lock_acquire+0x14e/0x2b0 _raw_spin_lock+0x30/0x40 sock_map_update_elem+0xdb/0x1f0 bpf_prog_2d0075e5d9b721cd_dump_unix+0x55/0x4f4 bpf_iter_run_prog+0x5b9/0xb00 bpf_iter_unix_seq_show+0x1f7/0x2e0 bpf_seq_read+0x42c/0x10d0 vfs_read+0x171/0xb20 ksys_read+0xff/0x200 do_syscall_64+0x6b/0x3a0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x76/0x7e

AnalysisAI

The Linux kernel's BPF sockmap subsystem deadlocks when a BPF iterator program iterating over AF_UNIX sockets via bpf_iter_unix_seq_show() simultaneously attempts to update a sockmap entry during the same execution context. When lock_sock_fast() takes the spinlock fast path and holds slock-AF_UNIX, any subsequent sock_map_update_elem() call within the BPF iterator program spins indefinitely attempting to re-acquire the same spinlock on the same CPU, causing an unrecoverable kernel deadlock and loss of system availability. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Recon
Acquire CAP_BPF or CAP_SYS_ADMIN
Delivery
Load BPF iterator program targeting AF_UNIX socket sequence
Exploit
Trigger iterator execution against a non-sleeping AF_UNIX socket
Install
lock_sock_fast() takes spinlock fast path holding slock-AF_UNIX
C2
BPF program calls bpf_map_update_elem() on sockmap
Execute
sock_map_update_elem() spins on already-held slock-AF_UNIX
Impact
Kernel thread deadlocks, system availability lost

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation Exploitation requires simultaneous satisfaction of all of the following: the attacker must hold `CAP_BPF` (Linux 5.8 and later) or `CAP_SYS_ADMIN` (earlier kernels or when CAP_BPF is unavailable); the host must not have `kernel.unprivileged_bpf_disabled` set to a value that blocks BPF program loading by the attacker's privilege level; the attacker must construct a BPF program using the `bpf_iter` framework specifically targeting the AF_UNIX socket sequence (`unix_diag`); and that BPF program must invoke a sockmap update (`bpf_map_update_elem()` on a `BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKMAP` or `BPF_MAP_TYPE_SOCKHASH`) during iterator execution. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment The vendor-assigned CVSS 3.1 score of 5.5 with vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H is well-calibrated: local access with low privilege, no complexity once the capability is held, and a denial-of-service outcome with no confidentiality or integrity impact. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario A local attacker holding CAP_BPF loads a crafted BPF iterator program that targets the AF_UNIX socket sequence interface and includes a `bpf_map_update_elem()` call against a pre-created sockmap. When the kernel reads the iterator output (e.g., via `/sys/fs/bpf` or a pinned iterator fd), `lock_sock_fast()` takes the spinlock fast path for a non-sleeping AF_UNIX socket, and the BPF program executes within that locked context. …
Remediation The definitive fix is to upgrade to a patched kernel release: 6.1.175, 6.6.141, 6.12.91, 6.18.33, 7.0.10, or 7.1 depending on the active stable branch. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

Share

CVE-2026-53035 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy