Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attacker hosts malicious RDP server
  2. Delivery
    Lure victim via crafted .rdp file or link
  3. Exploit
    Victim connects with Remote Desktop Client
  4. Execution
    Malicious server data triggers use-after-free
  5. Persist
    Corrupt heap and hijack execution
  6. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code as user

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the victim to open an outbound Remote Desktop connection to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP server - the malicious server, not an unauthenticated push to the victim, delivers the crafted RDP data that triggers the use-after-free in the client. The key limiting factor is UI:R: the user must be induced to launch mstsc against the hostile endpoint (e.g., open a malicious .rdp file, click an rdp:// link, or connect to a rogue/hijacked server), so this is not a self-propagating or drive-by network attack. No authentication is required on the attacker side (PR:N), attack complexity is low (AC:L), and any of the listed Windows 10/11 or Windows Server 2012-2025 clients (including Server Core) with an unpatched RDP client are exposed; the practical blast radius is limited to hosts whose users make outbound RDP connections to untrusted destinations.

Impact

The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, score 8.8) indicates a network-reachable, low-complexity, unauthenticated attack with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, but crucially gated by required user interaction (UI:R) - the victim must initiate or be lured into an RDP connection to a hostile server. No EPSS score was supplied, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified from the input. The CVE is not in CISA KEV and no POC is referenced, so despite the high CVSS this is not confirmed as an active or widespread threat; the practical risk is materially lowered by the UI:R requirement, which converts this from a wormable server-side bug into a client-side social-engineering-dependent one. It should still be treated as a priority for patch management given the ubiquity of the RDP client and the high technical impact, but it is a 'patch in normal cycle / prioritize outbound-RDP-heavy hosts' issue rather than an emergency, absent evidence of exploitation. Note: EPSS is missing and KEV status is negative, so real-world exploitation likelihood is inferred, not confirmed.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker stands up a malicious RDP server (or compromises a legitimate one) and lures a victim into connecting, for example by emailing a crafted .rdp file or a rdp:// link. When the victim's Remote Desktop Client processes the server's responses, the attacker triggers the use-after-free to corrupt heap memory and execute arbitrary code in the context of the connecting user. No public POC is identified at time of analysis, and the low attack complexity (AC:L) means reliable exploitation is plausible once the victim connects.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.6% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026

Remote code execution in Microsoft's Remote Desktop Client (the RDP client, mstsc.exe, shipped across Windows 10, Windows 11, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025) allows an unauthorized attacker to run arbitrary code over the network by triggering a use-after-free memory-corruption condition. Exploitation requires the victim to connect to an attacker-controlled or compromised RDP endpoint (UI:R), after which the malicious server can corrupt client-side memory to achieve full code execution. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the CVE is not listed in CISA KEV; a vendor patch is available from Microsoft.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory - apply the Microsoft security update for CVE-2026-50474 referenced at https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50474, selecting the update corresponding to each affected OS (Windows 10 1607/1809/21H2/22H2, Windows 11 24H2/25H2/26H1, and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 including Server Core); exact fixed build numbers are not provided in the input and should be taken from the MSRC page. As a compensating control until patched, restrict outbound RDP (TCP/UDP 3389) at the network egress to only known, trusted RDP servers so clients cannot connect to attacker-controlled endpoints - the side effect is that legitimate connections to new or external RDP hosts will break. Additionally, train users not to open .rdp files or click RDP links from untrusted sources and consider blocking .rdp file delivery via email, since the UI:R requirement means exploitation depends on the user initiating a connection; the trade-off is added friction for admins who legitimately share .rdp files.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7548
Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8875
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5386
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7548
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339

Affected Packages

euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7548
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7548
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8875
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5386
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33158

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 18 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The flaw is a CWE-416 Use-After-Free in the Windows Remote Desktop Client, the RDP client component (mstsc / mstscax) that speaks the Remote Desktop Protocol to RDP servers. A use-after-free occurs when the client continues to reference a heap object after it has been freed, allowing a malicious server to reclaim and control that memory, corrupt object state, and ultimately hijack execution flow. Per the affected CPE set, the vulnerable code is present in the RDP client stack of Windows 10 (1607, 1809, 21H2, 22H2), Windows 11 (24H2, 25H2, 26H1), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025 including Server Core installations. Because the vulnerability lives in the client parser that processes server-supplied RDP data, the trust boundary is inverted from typical RDP concerns: here the server attacks the connecting client. Tags note both Memory Corruption and Denial Of Service as possible impacts of the same UAF.

Know when Windows Server 2012 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable client bug with no attacker auth (PR:N) but victim must connect to a malicious RDP server (UI:R); UAF yields full RCE, so C/I/A all High.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorVendor: microsoft

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

Use after free in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity remote code execution vulnerability in Microsoft Remote Desktop Client (mstsc.exe) affects Windows 10, 11, and Server 2012-2025 systems. With no public exploit identified at time of analysis, the vulnerability still allows attackers to execute arbitrary code after victims connect to compromised RDP endpoints, creating significant risk for organizations relying on RDP for remote access.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.6%
Top 54% exploitable
Prevalence
Ubiquitous
RDP client (mstsc) ships built into every Windows and Windows Server edition
Threat Intel
1
1 sources
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Unlikely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.6%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

45
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.

Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.

Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2017-0199 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 12

Remote code execution in Microsoft Office 2007-2016 and Windows Vista through 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary c

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2021-42278 HIGH POC
7.5 Nov 10

Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy