Skip to main content
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach exposed RDP port 3389
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted RDP protocol data
  3. Exploit
    Trigger buffer over-read in RDP parser
  4. Execution
    Server returns adjacent memory
  5. Impact
    Harvest leaked sensitive data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer over-read prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires network reachability to an enabled Windows Remote Desktop service listening on port 3389; the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) indicates no authentication and no user interaction are needed to trigger the over-read against a listening RDP endpoint. The practical limiting factor is exposure of the RDP service itself: hosts where RDP is disabled, firewalled to trusted management subnets, or fronted by a Remote Desktop Gateway/VPN with enforced Network Level Authentication remove or sharply reduce the reachable pre-authentication attack surface. Impact is bounded to information disclosure (C:H, I:N, A:N) - a buffer over-read returns adjacent memory rather than enabling code execution or denial of service - and the leaked data is partial and non-deterministic (SSVC Technical Impact: partial, Automatable: no), so it is more useful as an intelligence-gathering or ASLR-bypass primitive than a standalone compromise.

Impact

Signals are consistent and point to a real-but-moderate priority. CVSS 3.1 rates it 7.5 (High) driven entirely by remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity access (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) against confidentiality only. However, corroborating exploitation signals are all low: CISA SSVC lists Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial, and EPSS is 0.67% (48th percentile) - below the threshold for imminent mass exploitation. There is no CISA KEV listing and no public exploit identified. The main tension is that a network-facing, no-auth information leak in a service as widely exposed as RDP is attractive to attackers, yet an over-read typically yields partial, non-deterministic memory rather than a reliable primitive, which aligns with SSVC 'partial' technical impact and 'not automatable.' Net: patch on a prompt cadence, prioritizing internet-exposed or DMZ RDP hosts, but this is not a drop-everything emergency absent evidence of active exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who can reach an exposed RDP listener (TCP/UDP 3389) on an unpatched Windows host sends crafted RDP protocol data that triggers the parser to read past a buffer boundary, and the server returns adjacent memory contents in its response. Repeating the request lets the attacker harvest fragments of process memory that may contain addresses defeating ASLR or sensitive session data. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, and given AV:N/AC:L the trigger is low-complexity, though the over-read yields partial, non-deterministic data.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.7% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 22, 2026

Information disclosure in Microsoft Windows Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to read out-of-bounds memory over the network, potentially leaking sensitive process data such as memory addresses that defeat ASLR, session state, or credential fragments. The flaw (CWE-126, buffer over-read) affects a broad range of Windows client and server releases from Windows Server 2012 through Windows Server 2025 and Windows 10/11 including 26H1. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none; EPSS estimates a modest 0.67% (48th percentile) probability of exploitation.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: apply the Microsoft security updates that raise each build to at or above the fixed versions in the advisory (for example Windows 11 24H2 to 10.0.26100.8875, Windows Server 2025 to 10.0.26100.33158, Server 2022 to 10.0.20348.5386, Server 2019/Windows 10 1809 to 10.0.17763.9020, Server 2016/Windows 10 1607 to 10.0.14393.9339, Server 2012 R2 to 6.3.9600.23291, Server 2012 to 6.2.9200.26226) via Windows Update or WSUS, sourced from https://msrc.microsoft.com/update-guide/vulnerability/CVE-2026-50445. Until patched, reduce exposure by not publishing RDP directly to the internet: place RDP behind a Remote Desktop Gateway or VPN, enforce Network Level Authentication (NLA) so an attacker must authenticate before reaching much of the vulnerable parsing path (trade-off: shrinks but does not fully eliminate the pre-auth surface), and restrict TCP/UDP 3389 at the host and perimeter firewall to known management subnets (trade-off: can disrupt legitimate remote admin if allowlists are incomplete). Disable RDP entirely on hosts that do not require it, and prioritize any internet-facing or jump-box RDP endpoints first.

Affected VersionsENISA

Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows 11 Version 24H2 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.8875
Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows 10 Version 1809 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.0 <10.0.20348.5386
Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.0 <6.3.9600.23291
Windows 11 Version 25H2 10.0.26200.0 <10.0.26200.8875
Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.0 <6.2.9200.26226
Windows 10 Version 21H2 10.0.19044.0 <10.0.19044.7548
Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.0 <10.0.26100.33158
Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows 11 version 26H1 10.0.28000.0 <10.0.28000.2269
Windows 10 Version 22H2 10.0.19045.0 <10.0.19045.7548
Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.0 <10.0.17763.9020
Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339
Windows 10 Version 1607 10.0.14393.0 <10.0.14393.9339

Affected Packages

microsoft windows_10_version_1607_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows 10 Version 1607 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.14393.9339, Windows 10 Version 1607 for x64-based Systems 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_10_version_1809_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows 10 Version 1809 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.17763.9020, Windows 10 Version 1809 for x64-based Systems 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_10_version_21h2_10_0_19044_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 21H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548, Windows 10 Version 21H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19044.7548
microsoft windows_10_version_22h2_10_0_19045_7548 fix: Windows 10 Version 22H2 for 32-bit Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548, Windows 10 Version 22H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.19045.7548
microsoft windows_11_version_24h2_10_0_26100_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 24H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875, Windows 11 Version 24H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26100.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_25h2_10_0_26200_8875 fix: Windows 11 Version 25H2 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875, Windows 11 Version 25H2 for x64-based Systems 10.0.26200.8875
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2269 fix: Windows 11 version 26H1 for x64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2269
microsoft windows_11_version_26h1_10_0_28000_2525 fix: Windows 11 Version 26H1 for ARM64-based Systems 10.0.28000.2525
microsoft windows_server_2012_6_2_9200_26226 fix: Windows Server 2012 6.2.9200.26226, Windows Server 2012 (Server Core installation) 6.2.9200.26226
microsoft windows_server_2012_r2_6_3_9600_23291 fix: Windows Server 2012 R2 6.3.9600.23291, Windows Server 2012 R2 (Server Core installation) 6.3.9600.23291
microsoft windows_server_2016_10_0_14393_9339 fix: Windows Server 2016 10.0.14393.9339, Windows Server 2016 (Server Core installation) 10.0.14393.9339
microsoft windows_server_2019_10_0_17763_9020 fix: Windows Server 2019 10.0.17763.9020, Windows Server 2019 (Server Core installation) 10.0.17763.9020
microsoft windows_server_2022_10_0_20348_5386 fix: Windows Server 2022 10.0.20348.5386
microsoft windows_server_2025_10_0_26100_33158 fix: Windows Server 2025 10.0.26100.33158, Windows Server 2025 (Server Core installation) 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_10_version_1607 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_10_version_1809 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_10_version_21h2 fix: 10.0.19044.7548
euvd windows_10_version_22h2 fix: 10.0.19045.7548
euvd windows_11_version_24h2 fix: 10.0.26100.8875
euvd windows_11_version_25h2 fix: 10.0.26200.8875
euvd windows_11_version_26h1 fix: 10.0.28000.2269
euvd windows_server_2012 fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2012_r2 fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_r2_server_core_installation fix: 6.3.9600.23291
euvd windows_server_2012_server_core_installation fix: 6.2.9200.26226
euvd windows_server_2016 fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2016_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.14393.9339
euvd windows_server_2019 fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2019_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.17763.9020
euvd windows_server_2022 fix: 10.0.20348.5386
euvd windows_server_2025 fix: 10.0.26100.33158
euvd windows_server_2025_server_core_installation fix: 10.0.26100.33158

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 32 packages in microsoft, euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability lives in Windows Remote Desktop Protocol, the RDP stack (typically termdd/rdpcorets and related components) that services incoming connections on TCP/UDP 3389. CWE-126 (Buffer Over-read) means the RDP parser reads memory beyond the bounds of an allocated buffer while processing attacker-controlled protocol data, returning adjacent heap or stack contents to the client. Because impact is confined to confidentiality (C:H, I:N, A:N) the defect discloses memory rather than corrupting it or granting code execution. The CPE and EUVD data pin the affected code to Microsoft's core RDP implementation shipped across Windows 10 (1607-22H2), Windows 11 (24H2, 25H2, 26H1), and Windows Server 2012 through 2025, including Server Core installations, indicating the flaw sits in shared platform RDP code rather than an edition-specific feature.

Know when Windows Server 2012 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (microsoft) PRIMARY MEDIUM
NVD 7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
CIRCL (temporal) 5.7 MEDIUM
vuln.today AI 7.5 HIGH

Remote unauthenticated network access to the RDP listener with no user interaction, and a buffer over-read that discloses memory only, so C:H but I:N/A:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (microsoft).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

4
Severity Changed
Jul 21, 2026 - 16:37 NVD
MEDIUM HIGH
CVSS changed
Jul 21, 2026 - 16:37 NVD
6.5 (MEDIUM) 7.5 (HIGH)
CVE Published
Jul 14, 2026 - 17:07 nvd
HIGH 7.5
CVE Published
Jul 14, 2026 - 17:07 nvd
MEDIUM 6.5

DescriptionNVD

Buffer over-read in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

A high-severity remote access vulnerability in Windows RDP (CVE-2026-50445) allows unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive information from memory, potentially compromising credential security and defeating built-in protections like ASLR. The flaw affects millions of Windows endpoints and servers spanning Windows 10/11 and Server 2012-2025, creating substantial risk across enterprise environments. With a patch now available, enterprises must prioritize rapid remediation across their entire affected infrastructure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.7%
Top 52% exploitable
Prevalence
High
RDP enabled on a large share of enterprise Windows servers and workstations
Vendor Action
See Below
Required. The vulnerability documented by this CVE requires customer action to resolve.
Vendor Status
Publicly Disclosed:No
Exploited:No
Latest Software Release:Exploitation Less Likely
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.7%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

39
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: +1
CVSS: +38
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

CVE-2021-40444 HIGH POC
8.8 Sep 15

Windows MSHTML component contains a remote code execution vulnerability that allows attackers to craft malicious ActiveX

CVE-2021-34527 HIGH POC
8.8 Jul 02

<p>A remote code execution vulnerability exists when the Windows Print Spooler service improperly performs privileged fi

CVE-2017-0199 HIGH POC
7.8 Apr 12

Remote code execution in Microsoft Office 2007-2016 and Windows Vista through 10 allows attackers to execute arbitrary c

CVE-2022-30190 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 01

Windows MSDT (Microsoft Support Diagnostic Tool) allows remote code execution when called via the ms-msdt URL protocol f

CVE-2017-0147 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 17

The SMBv1 server in Microsoft Windows Vista SP2; Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1; Windows 7 SP1; Windows 8.1; Windows

CVE-2018-8174 HIGH POC
7.5 May 09

The Windows VBScript engine contains a remote code execution vulnerability in object handling that allows full system co

CVE-2021-1675 HIGH POC
7.8 Jun 08

Windows Print Spooler Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no auth

CVE-2016-7255 HIGH POC
7.8 Nov 10

The Win32k kernel-mode driver in Windows Vista through Windows Server 2016 allows local privilege escalation, exploited

CVE-2023-36884 HIGH POC
7.5 Jul 11

Windows Search Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerability is remotely explo

CVE-2019-1458 HIGH POC
7.8 Dec 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2018-8453 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 10

An elevation of privilege vulnerability exists in Windows when the Win32k component fails to properly handle objects in

CVE-2021-42278 HIGH POC
7.5 Nov 10

Active Directory Domain Services Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this vulnerabilit

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy