Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable API with any authenticated low-privilege role gives AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N; impact is dominated by integrity (PKI control) and confidentiality (CA keys/SSRF), with only limited availability effect (A:L).
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/Netflix/lemur).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/Netflix/lemur
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
StrictRolePermission and AuthorityCreatorPermission in lemur/auth/permissions.py call flask_principal.Permission.__init__() with zero Needs when their config flags are unset. Both flags defaulted to False in code prior to the fix, so this was the state of any Lemur install that hadn't explicitly opted in.
Flask-Principal's Permission.allows() returns True whenever self.needs is empty. The .can() gate therefore passes for every authenticated identity, including the lowest-privilege role Lemur ships (read-only).
A user holding only read-only can create root Certificate Authorities, create and edit notifications (an SSRF sink), create domain entries, and upload arbitrary certificates. These classes are the sole authorization check on those endpoints.
Root Cause
# lemur/auth/permissions.py
class AuthorityCreatorPermission(Permission):
def __init__(self):
requires_admin = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION", False)
if requires_admin:
super().__init__(RoleNeed("admin"))
else:
super().__init__()
# empty Need set
class StrictRolePermission(Permission):
def __init__(self):
strict_role_enforcement = current_app.config.get("LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT", False)
if strict_role_enforcement:
needs = [RoleNeed("admin"), RoleNeed("operator")]
super().__init__(*needs)
else:
super().__init__()
# empty Need setflask_principal.Permission.allows() (upstream, v0.4.0):
def allows(self, identity):
if self.needs and not self.needs.intersection(identity.provides):
return False
...
return TrueWhen self.needs == set(), the first guard is falsy and is skipped. excludes is also empty, so allows() returns True for any identity. AuthenticatedResource (the parent class for these views) sets method_decorators = [login_required], which checks authentication only, no role. So the permission .can() is the only authorization layer in front of these endpoints.
Affected Endpoints
Views whose only authorization check is StrictRolePermission().can() or AuthorityCreatorPermission().can():
| Method | Path | Source |
|---|---|---|
| POST | /api/1/authorities | lemur/authorities/views.py:231 |
| POST | /api/1/certificates/upload | lemur/certificates/views.py:651 |
| POST | /api/1/pending_certificates/\<id>/upload | lemur/pending_certificates/views.py:545 |
| POST | /api/1/notifications | lemur/notifications/views.py:227 |
| PUT/DEL | /api/1/notifications/\<id> | lemur/notifications/views.py:370,384 |
| POST | /api/1/domains | lemur/domains/views.py:131 |
POST /api/1/authorities is gated by AuthorityCreatorPermission().can() and StrictRolePermission().can(); both have empty Needs by default. The other rows are gated by StrictRolePermission().can() alone.
Note on scope: PUT /api/1/authorities/<id> also references StrictRolePermission, but its gate is AuthorityPermission(...).can() and StrictRolePermission().can(). AuthorityPermission is constructed with non-empty Needs (RoleNeed("admin") plus authority-scoped needs), so that endpoint is not bypassable by a read-only user and is excluded from this report.
Impact
A user holding only the read-only role can:
- Create root Certificate Authorities. CA cert and private key are persisted in Lemur's DB with the attacker as owner. Any internal trust store that pins Lemur-managed roots can now be signed against by the attacker.
- Upload arbitrary certificates via
/certificates/upload, including attacker-supplied keys with destinations such as AWS push. - Create or modify notifications, which reach an SSRF sink (see related finding F3, Slack notification webhook).
- Mark arbitrary domains as
sensitive, manipulating Lemur's domain registry and the cert-issuance approval path.
Combined with any low-privilege credential leak (phished employee, leaked SSO token) or insider access, this is a pivot from "any authenticated identity" to control of the PKI issuance plane.
Remediation
The config flag defaults for ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION and LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT were changed from False to True. Restrictive role enforcement is now active on all default installs without requiring explicit configuration.
class AuthorityCreatorPermission(Permission):
def __init__(self):
requires_admin = current_app.config.get("ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION", True)
...
class StrictRolePermission(Permission):
def __init__(self):
strict_role_enforcement = current_app.config.get("LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT", True)
...Note: The opt-out branches (empty Needs) remain in the code. Operators who explicitly set ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION = False or LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT = False in their config will reintroduce the bypass. These flags should be left unset or set to True.
Articles & Coverage 1
AnalysisAI
Privilege escalation via broken authorization in Netflix Lemur (versions <= 1.9.0) lets any authenticated user - including the shipped lowest-privilege read-only role - perform admin-only certificate-management actions. Because the StrictRolePermission and AuthorityCreatorPermission classes were instantiated with an empty Need set when their config flags were left at the default False, Flask-Principal's allows() returns True for every identity, removing the only role gate in front of CA creation, certificate upload, notification (SSRF sink) management, and domain registry edits. No public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not in CISA KEV, but exploitation requires only a single low-privilege credential, making it a direct pivot to control of the PKI issuance plane.
Technical ContextAI
Lemur is Netflix's open-source X.509 certificate orchestration platform (PyPI package lemur), used to manage certificate authorities, issuance, and notifications. Authorization for sensitive endpoints relies on Flask-Principal Permission objects whose .can() method calls allows(identity). The root cause is CWE-863 (Incorrect Authorization): flask_principal.Permission.allows() (v0.4.0) short-circuits its denial check with if self.needs and not self.needs.intersection(...), so an empty self.needs set causes the guard to be skipped and the function to return True for any identity. Lemur's AuthorityCreatorPermission and StrictRolePermission constructed the parent with zero Needs whenever ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION and LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT were unset (both defaulted to False). The affected views inherit from AuthenticatedResource, whose method_decorators = [login_required] enforce authentication only, so the empty-Need permission was the sole authorization layer protecting POST /api/1/authorities, /api/1/certificates/upload, /api/1/pending_certificates/<id>/upload, /api/1/notifications (POST/PUT/DELETE), and POST /api/1/domains.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to Lemur 1.9.1, which changes the defaults of ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION and LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT from False to True so restrictive role enforcement is active on all default installs (see GHSA-qcqw-jwxc-2hqg). If you cannot upgrade immediately, set ADMIN_ONLY_AUTHORITY_CREATION = True and LEMUR_STRICT_ROLE_ENFORCEMENT = True explicitly in your Lemur configuration to restore the admin/operator role gate on the affected endpoints; the trade-off is that legitimate non-admin workflows that previously created authorities, uploaded certificates, or managed notifications will now be denied and must be re-assigned to admin/operator roles. Critically, do NOT set either flag back to False after patching - the opt-out branches with empty Needs remain in the code, so an explicit False reintroduces the full bypass; leave the flags unset (now safe-by-default in 1.9.1) or pinned to True. As an additional compensating control, audit existing root CAs, uploaded certificates, notifications, and sensitive domain entries created by non-admin users for unauthorized changes, and tighten which identities hold any authenticated Lemur role.
Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t
BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser
pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.
Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301
In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne
Cross-user flow execution in Langflow (< 1.9.1) lets any authenticated API-key holder run another user's flow by passing
Same weakness CWE-863 – Incorrect Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-61100
GHSA-qcqw-jwxc-2hqg