Skip to main content

Quantum Security Gateway CVE-2026-48135

| EUVDEUVD-2026-31822 MEDIUM
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-05-26 checkpoint GHSA-xf23-668r-fgjv
5.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: checkpoint
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Send malformed HTTP request to gateway service
  2. Delivery
    Trigger heap-based buffer overflow in HTTP parser
  3. Exploit
    Corrupt heap memory structures
  4. Execution
    Crash or destabilize HTTP service
  5. Impact
    Availability disruption on target gateway

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No special authentication or user interaction is required - the CVSS vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N confirms remote unauthenticated exploitation against the HTTP-based service of Check Point Quantum Security Gateway. The limiting condition is that the vulnerable HTTP-based service must be network-reachable by the attacker; if the service is firewalled or restricted to trusted management networks, the attack surface is significantly reduced. The vulnerability is present across a wide version range (all R81.10 and below, specific hotfix levels of R81.20, R82, and R82.10), so version alone does not limit exposure without a confirmed patched hotfix applied. No specific non-default configuration is identified as a prerequisite - the HTTP request parsing flaw appears to be in core service functionality.

Impact

There is a meaningful and explicit conflict between the CVSS scoring and the SSVC assessment that security teams must not overlook. CVSS 5.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L) positions this as a medium-severity partial-DoS with no confidentiality or integrity impact. However, SSVC independently assesses Technical Impact as 'total' - a classification typically reserved for vulnerabilities enabling full system compromise or complete data loss. CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow) is consistent with the SSVC assessment, as heap overflows have historically been escalated to remote code execution under favorable heap layout conditions. Whether the 'A:L' CVSS score accurately reflects the ceiling of exploitability, or whether it reflects exploitation difficulty at the time of scoring, is not confirmed from available data. EPSS at 0.06% (19th percentile) indicates very low observed exploitation probability at time of analysis, and the vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog. Nevertheless, SSVC Automatable: yes combined with AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N means internet-scale automated scanning and exploitation is theoretically feasible. This is a real priority for organizations running exposed Quantum Security Gateways - not because exploitation is confirmed, but because the attack surface is unauthenticated, network-reachable, and requires no interaction.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated remote attacker sends a series of specially crafted malformed HTTP requests to the Check Point Quantum Security Gateway's HTTP-based service from anywhere on the network. The malformed input triggers a heap-based buffer overflow in the request parsing routine, corrupting adjacent heap memory and causing the service to crash or become unresponsive. Given that SSVC rates the attack as automatable, a scripted scanner could identify and exploit vulnerable gateways at internet scale without requiring any credentials or prior access.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 08, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway's HTTP-based service allows unauthenticated remote attackers to cause availability disruption by sending crafted malformed HTTP requests requiring no authentication or user interaction. Affected deployments span all R81.10 releases and below, R81.20 through Jumbo Hotfix Take 127, R82 through Jumbo Hotfix Take 91, and R82.10 through Jumbo Hotfix Take 19. No public exploit identified at time of analysis, though SSVC classifies the attack as automatable with total technical impact - a meaningful tension with the CVSS A:L rating that security teams should scrutinize before deprioritizing.

RemediationAI

The primary remediation is to apply the appropriate Jumbo Hotfix for the installed release train per the Check Point vendor advisory at https://support.checkpoint.com/results/sk/sk184991. For R81.20, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 128 or later. For R82, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 92 or later. For R82.10, upgrade to Jumbo Hotfix Take 20 or later. Installations on R81.10 or earlier should be considered fully affected with no inline hotfix path confirmed from available data - upgrading to a supported release train with a published fix is the recommended course of action. If immediate patching is not feasible, reducing external exposure of the HTTP-based management or gateway service through network-level controls (firewall rules restricting access to the service port to trusted IP ranges only) would reduce the unauthenticated attack surface, though this introduces operational friction for environments that rely on broad gateway accessibility. No vendor-confirmed workaround short of patching is identified in available data.

Affected VersionsENISA

Quantum Security Gateway All releases from R81.10 and below
Quantum Security Gateway R81.20 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 127 or below
Quantum Security Gateway R82.10 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 19 or below
Quantum Security Gateway R82 with Jumbo Hotfix Take 91 or below

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The vulnerability is rooted in CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow), meaning the affected HTTP-based service writes beyond the bounds of a heap-allocated buffer when processing malformed or unexpected HTTP request input. Heap overflows are distinct from stack overflows in that exploitation can corrupt adjacent heap metadata, function pointers, or application data structures - and, depending on heap layout, may enable outcomes beyond simple service crashes. The affected product is confirmed via CPE as cpe:2.3:a:checkpoint:quantum_security_gateway across a broad version range, meaning the flawed HTTP request parsing logic is present in the core gateway software rather than an optional add-on. The root cause is insufficient input validation during HTTP request parsing, allowing attacker-controlled data to overflow a dynamically allocated buffer.

Know when Checkpoint gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (checkpoint) PRIMARY 5.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

Primary rating from Vendor (checkpoint) · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorVendor: checkpoint

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

A Check Point HTTP-based service can incorrectly handle malformed HTTP requests. The issue is related to HTTP request parsing and validation.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 81% exploitable
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

CVE-2014-6271 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 24

GNU Bash through 4.3 processes trailing strings after function definitions in the values of environment variables, which

CVE-2024-24919 HIGH POC
8.6 May 28

Potentially allowing an attacker to read certain information on Check Point Security Gateways once connected to the inte

CVE-2014-7169 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 25

GNU Bash through 4.3 bash43-025 processes trailing strings after certain malformed function definitions in the values of

CVE-2017-1000083 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 05

backend/comics/comics-document.c (aka the comic book backend) in GNOME Evince before 3.24.1 allows remote attackers to e

CVE-2026-85102 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 09

Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway arises from improper certificate trust validation during V

CVE-2026-16232 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jul 22

Authentication bypass in the Check Point SmartConsole login process lets an unauthenticated remote attacker mint a valid

CVE-2026-50751 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Jun 08

Authentication bypass in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Spark Firewalls allows unauthenticated remote attacker

CVE-2026-93616 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 22

Unauthenticated attackers who can reach the file-upload interface of Check Point Management Server can combine directory

CVE-2021-3449 MEDIUM
5.9 Mar 25

An OpenSSL TLS server may crash if sent a maliciously crafted renegotiation ClientHello message from a client. Rated med

CVE-2026-85103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 09

Remote code execution in Check Point Quantum Security Gateway and Quantum Security Management stems from a heap-based bu

CVE-2026-91843 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 16

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Check Point Quantum Security Management, where a stack-based buffer overfl

CVE-2024-3568 CRITICAL POC
9.6 Apr 10

The huggingface/transformers library is vulnerable to arbitrary code execution through deserialization of untrusted data

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy