Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessObtain local low-priv account on GPU host
-
DeliveryRun crafted program calling vulnerable kernel-mode driver
-
ExploitAccess another process's GPU-mapped memory
-
ExecutionCorrupt memory / execute code in kernel context
-
ImpactEscalate privileges and exfiltrate victim data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Authorization checks on every request
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the attacker to already have a local, authenticated low-privileged account on a system running an affected NVIDIA GPU Display Driver (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, or Tesla) on Windows or Linux - per CVSS AV:L there is no remote or network exploitation path. Impact is maximized on multi-user or multi-tenant GPU deployments (shared workstations, VDI, containerized/cloud GPU nodes) where breaking cross-process GPU-memory isolation crosses a real trust boundary. Limiting factors: local access prerequisite, PR:L (some authenticated foothold needed), and availability of the vendor driver update which closes the flaw once applied. |
| Impact | This is a genuine local privilege-escalation priority rather than a hollow high-CVSS number. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H = 7.8) is internally consistent with the description: a kernel-mode flaw in the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver lets an already-authenticated local low-privileged user read memory belonging to another user's process, with full high impact across confidentiality, integrity and availability. No EPSS score, SSVC decision, KEV listing, or POC was supplied in the input, so exploitation probability and automatability cannot be quantified from the data. The local-only attack vector (AV:L) is the dominant risk-limiting factor - there is no remote or network reachability, so this is an escalation/lateral-movement primitive for an attacker who already has code running on the host, not a mass-exploitable perimeter bug. The impact is disproportionately serious on shared-GPU environments (multi-user workstations, VDI, containerized/cloud GPU nodes, ML training hosts) where cross-process/cross-tenant memory isolation is the security boundary being broken. Note CWE-862 (Missing Authorization) here describes a memory-isolation/authorization gap in the kernel driver, not a classic auth-bypass of a login mechanism, so the 'Authentication Bypass' tag overstates the class. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A low-privileged local user on a shared GPU host (e.g. a VDI seat, ML training box, or multi-tenant cloud GPU node) runs a crafted program that issues calls into the vulnerable NVIDIA kernel-mode driver to read or corrupt GPU-mapped memory owned by another user's process. By harvesting secrets from or tampering with the victim process they achieve information disclosure and, via memory corruption in kernel context, potential code execution and privilege escalation. No public exploit code is identified in the provided data, and exploitation requires prior local access to the machine. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Local privilege escalation in NVIDIA's GPU Display Driver (GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla, on both Windows and Linux) allows an authenticated low-privileged local user to reach GPU memory belonging to another process, enabling code execution, escalation of privileges, data tampering, denial of service, and information disclosure. Per the assessed vector (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H) there is no remote or network path; the flaw is most consequential on shared, multi-user, VDI, or multi-tenant GPU hosts where cross-process GPU memory isolation is the boundary between users and tenants. No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and the provided vendor reference points to NVIDIA's product security advisory (2026/5861) rather than a fixed driver version named in this data set.
RemediationAI
Apply the vendor driver update published by NVIDIA for the affected GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla branches; the advisory at https://github.com/NVIDIA/product-security/tree/main/2026/5861 should be consulted for the exact fixed driver version, because no specific patch version is stated in the provided data and none should be assumed. Until the fixed driver is deployed, prioritize compensating controls that account for the local, authenticated prerequisite (AV:L/PR:L): reduce the number of low-privileged local accounts able to log on to GPU-owning hosts and restrict interactive/RDP/SSH access to those systems, accepting that this limits shared-workstation usability; on multi-tenant or cloud GPU nodes, isolate tenants with hardware partitioning or dedicated GPU instances (for example MIG or vGPU-style separation, or one GPU per trust domain), understanding that this reduces GPU utilization and consolidation density; and where feasible, run GPU workloads inside isolated VMs or sandboxes so that a compromised tenant cannot reach the host driver instance - noting this adds virtualization overhead and management complexity. Because the impact is a cross-process trust-boundary break rather than a remote attack, monitoring should focus on unusual driver handle access, unexpected cross-process GPU memory activity, and privilege-escalation behavior from ordinary user accounts on shared GPU hosts, since blocking the driver or the device entirely is not a viable control for GPU-dependent workloads. After patching, verify the installed driver version reports as fixed and re-check any host previously exposed to untrusted local users.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue resides in the kernel-mode layer of the NVIDIA GPU Display Driver and is classified as CWE-862 Missing Authorization, meaning the root cause is an absent or inadequate access-control check rather than a classic memory-corruption primitive (such as an out-of-bounds write or use-after-free): a process is not properly authorized/restricted to its own GPU memory, so it can reach allocations owned by another user's process. The CPE data covers three product families - nvidia:geforce, nvidia:rtx_quadro_nvs, and nvidia:tesla - each expressed with wildcard versions, so the source material does not enumerate which specific driver branches are vulnerable; the advisory tags (Microsoft, Linux, Guest Driver) confirm both Windows and Linux driver stacks are in scope. With AV:L, PR:L, and UI:N under an unchanged scope (S:U), exploitation requires an existing low-privileged local account and provides no remote foothold, but it does cross a real user/process trust boundary on platforms where multiple users or tenants share a GPU, such as multi-session workstations, VDI deployments, and containerized or cloud GPU nodes where breaking GPU memory isolation is the security-relevant step.
Know when Windows gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Local kernel-driver flaw needs an authenticated low-priv foothold (AV:L/PR:L), no interaction, and yields full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact via cross-process memory access and potential code execution.
Primary rating from Vendor (nvidia).
CVSS VectorVendor: nvidia
DescriptionCVE.org
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Windows and Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer, where a user could access memory belonging to another user's process. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, escalation of privileges, data tampering, denial of service, and information disclosure.
Articles & Coverage 4
Executive ViewAI
NVIDIA's GPU Display Driver family-covering GeForce, RTX/Quadro/NVS, and Tesla on Windows and Linux-contains a high-severity local privilege escalation flaw. On shared, VDI, or multi-tenant GPU hosts, an authenticated local user could cross tenant or process boundaries and compromise confidentiality, integrity, and availability. Leadership should prioritize shared GPU estates because no vendor-released patch was identified at time of analysis and the business risk is concentrated where GPU resources are pooled across users or customers. No public exploit identified at time of analysis.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; restrict local interactive access and enforce least privilege, isolate or segment shared/VDI/multi-tenant GPU hosts, limit concurrent untrusted users on the same GPU host, enable enhanced GPU/driver logging and monitoring, and follow NVIDIA advisory 2026/5861 for any vendor-provided mitigations.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Unauthenticated remote code execution in SmarterTools SmarterMail lets an attacker upload arbitrary files to any locatio
Windows Win32k fails to properly handle objects in memory, allowing local privilege escalation exploited in the wild in
A privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 5.5). Risk factors: actively exploited (KEV-listed), EPSS 94% exploitation pr
Windows Internet Shortcut Files (.url) contain an external control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33053, CVSS 8.8) that enables
Windows SMB contains an improper access control vulnerability (CVE-2025-33073, CVSS 8.8) enabling authenticated attacker
Twonky Server 8.5.2 on Linux and Windows allows unauthenticated access to the admin log file through a web service API b
An unrestricted file upload vulnerability exists in MiniWeb HTTP Server <= Build 300 that allows unauthenticated remote
FreeFloat FTP Server contains multiple critical design flaws that allow unauthenticated remote attackers to upload arbit
Serviio Media Server versions 1.4 through 1.8 on Windows contain an unauthenticated command injection in the /rest/actio
Twonky Server 8.5.2 uses hard-coded cryptographic keys for encrypting the administrator password. Combined with the cred
Mako Server versions 2.5 and 2.6 contain an unauthenticated OS command injection via the tutorial interface at examples/
React Native Metro Development Server binds to external interfaces by default and contains an OS command injection endpo
Same weakness CWE-862 – Missing Authorization
View allSame technique Authentication Bypass
View allVendor StatusVendor
SUSE
Severity: Important| Product | Status |
|---|---|
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP applications 16.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.1 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Micro 6.2 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 16.0 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Basesystem 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP4-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP5-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP6-LTSS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP4-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise High Performance Computing 15 SP5-ESPOS | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Public Cloud 15 SP6 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Real Time 15 SP4 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Proxy LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Retail Branch Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server 4.3 | Affected |
| SUSE Manager Server LTS 4.3 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.4 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.5 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap 15.6 | Affected |
| openSUSE Leap Micro 5.5 | Affected |
| SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for NVIDIA 16.1 | Affected |
EUVD-2026-90114
GHSA-rjg5-6r96-qv99
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
Exploit-DB