Skip to main content

Python CVE-2026-44844

| EUVDEUVD-2026-31977 MEDIUM
Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674)
2026-05-08 https://github.com/GOVCERT-LU/eml_parser GHSA-g47v-rwmh-r9f8
6.3
CVSS 4.0 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
6.3 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
X

Lifecycle Timeline

2
CVSS changed
May 26, 2026 - 21:22 NVD
6.3 (MEDIUM)
CVE Published
May 08, 2026 - 23:12 nvd
MEDIUM

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() recurses unconditionally for every nested message/rfc822 attachment without any depth limit. An attacker who can supply a badly crafted EML file with approximately 120 nested message/rfc822 parts triggers an unhandled RecursionError and aborts parsing of the message. A 12 KB EML file is enough to crash a worker. Though this causes the parser to crash, it is an unlikely scenario as the suggested EML that crashes the parser would not pass basic RFC compliance tests.

Details

The vulnerable function is EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() in eml_parser/parser.py. For every part of type multipart/*, the function iterates over its sub-parts; for every sub-part of type message/rfc822, it calls itself recursively on the inner message:

There is no depth parameter and no early-abort. CPython's default sys.recursionlimit is 1000. Each level of message/rfc822 nesting adds approximately 8 frames to the stack (parser code + stdlib _header_value_parser calls), so roughly 120 nested levels exhaust the limit.

The RecursionError is not caught anywhere along the call chain, so it propagates out of decode_email_bytes() and aborts processing of the entire message.

PoC

Environment: Python 3.12.3, eml_parser 3.0.0 (pip install eml_parser==3.0.0), default sys.recursionlimit=1000, Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64. No special configuration of EmlParser, default constructor.

Self-contained reproducer that builds the PoC and triggers the crash:

python
import eml_parser

def build_poc(depth=124):
    inner = b"From: a@a\r\nTo: b@b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\n.\r\n"
    msg = inner
    for i in range(depth):
        b = f"B{i}".encode()
        msg = (
            b'Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="' + b + b'"\r\n\r\n'
            b'--' + b + b'\r\nContent-Type: message/rfc822\r\n\r\n'
        ) + msg + b'\r\n--' + b + b'--\r\n'
    return msg

ep = eml_parser.EmlParser()
ep.decode_email_bytes(build_poc())
# RecursionError after ~76 ms on Apple Silicon (Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64).

Note that the suggested code does not produce an RFC compliant message. Resulting EML payload size: 12,369 bytes. SHA-256 of generated PoC: 00f15f635e21b4144967c2893b37425e6a6bd7b4185c557e5c7e904e1e6d18e8

The crash is deterministic on a stock install. No network, no special headers, no large attachments.

Impact

Denial of service of any pipeline that processes attacker-supplied EML files using eml_parser.

A single 12 KB email is enough to crash a worker. If the worker is a long-running process triaging multiple emails, the unhandled exception aborts processing of the whole batch unless the caller wraps the call in a broad try/except. Even then, attacker-supplied volume can keep workers in a perpetual restart loop.

The vulnerability is exploitable pre-authentication in any deployment that ingests emails from external senders which have not been subject to any kind of basic validation. Considering that email messages pass through a mail-server which does some kind of validation, messages as produced by the *build_poc* function would not reach eml_parser. Nonetheless recursion depth checks have been implemented to handle the described issue.

Reporter

Sebastián Alba Vives (@Sebasteuo) Independent security researcher, Senior AppSec Consultant LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastian-alba Email: sebasjosue84@gmail.com PGP: 0D1A E4C2 CFC8 894F 19EA DA24 45CD CA33 2CF8 31F4

Analysis

Summary

EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() recurses unconditionally for every nested message/rfc822 attachment without any depth limit. An attacker who can supply a badly crafted EML file with approximately 120 nested message/rfc822 parts triggers an unhandled RecursionError and aborts parsing of the message. A 12 KB EML file is enough to crash a worker. Though this causes the parser to crash, it is an unlikely scenario as the suggested EML that crashes the parser would not pass basic RFC compliance tests.

Details

The vulnerable function is EmlParser.get_raw_body_text() in eml_parser/parser.py. For every part of type multipart/*, the function iterates over its sub-parts; for every sub-part of type message/rfc822, it calls itself recursively on the inner message:

There is no depth parameter and no early-abort. CPython's default sys.recursionlimit is 1000. Each level of message/rfc822 nesting adds approximately 8 frames to the stack (parser code + stdlib _header_value_parser calls), so roughly 120 nested levels exhaust the limit.

The RecursionError is not caught anywhere along the call chain, so it propagates out of decode_email_bytes() and aborts processing of the entire message.

PoC

Environment: Python 3.12.3, eml_parser 3.0.0 (pip install eml_parser==3.0.0), default sys.recursionlimit=1000, Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64. No special configuration of EmlParser, default constructor.

Self-contained reproducer that builds the PoC and triggers the crash:

python
import eml_parser

def build_poc(depth=124):
    inner = b"From: a@a\r\nTo: b@b\r\nContent-Type: text/plain\r\n\r\n.\r\n"
    msg = inner
    for i in range(depth):
        b = f"B{i}".encode()
        msg = (
            b'Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="' + b + b'"\r\n\r\n'
            b'--' + b + b'\r\nContent-Type: message/rfc822\r\n\r\n'
        ) + msg + b'\r\n--' + b + b'--\r\n'
    return msg

ep = eml_parser.EmlParser()
ep.decode_email_bytes(build_poc())
# RecursionError after ~76 ms on Apple Silicon (Ubuntu 24.04 aarch64).

Note that the suggested code does not produce an RFC compliant message. Resulting EML payload size: 12,369 bytes. SHA-256 of generated PoC: 00f15f635e21b4144967c2893b37425e6a6bd7b4185c557e5c7e904e1e6d18e8

The crash is deterministic on a stock install. No network, no special headers, no large attachments.

Impact

Denial of service of any pipeline that processes attacker-supplied EML files using eml_parser.

A single 12 KB email is enough to crash a worker. If the worker is a long-running process triaging multiple emails, the unhandled exception aborts processing of the whole batch unless the caller wraps the call in a broad try/except. Even then, attacker-supplied volume can keep workers in a perpetual restart loop.

The vulnerability is exploitable pre-authentication in any deployment that ingests emails from external senders which have not been subject to any kind of basic validation. Considering that email messages pass through a mail-server which does some kind of validation, messages as produced by the *build_poc* function would not reach eml_parser. Nonetheless recursion depth checks have been implemented to handle the described issue.

Reporter

Sebastián Alba Vives (@Sebasteuo) Independent security researcher, Senior AppSec Consultant LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/sebastian-alba Email: sebasjosue84@gmail.com PGP: 0D1A E4C2 CFC8 894F 19EA DA24 45CD CA33 2CF8 31F4

More in Python

View all
CVE-2025-24016 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Feb 10

Wazuh SIEM platform versions 4.4.0 through 4.9.0 contain an unsafe deserialization vulnerability in the DistributedAPI t

CVE-2025-27520 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 04

BentoML version 1.4.2 and earlier contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability through insecure deser

CVE-2025-2945 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Apr 03

pgAdmin 4 contains critical remote code execution vulnerabilities in the Query Tool download and Cloud Deployment endpoi

CVE-2013-5093 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Sep 27

The renderLocalView function in render/views.py in graphite-web in Graphite 0.9.5 through 0.9.10 uses the pickle Python

CVE-2025-32375 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 09

BentoML is a Python library for building online serving systems optimized for AI apps and model inference. Rated critica

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2024-21644 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 08

pyLoad download manager version prior to 0.5.0b3.dev77 exposes the Flask SECRET_KEY through an unauthenticated endpoint.

CVE-2017-9462 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 06

In Mercurial before 4.1.3, "hg serve --stdio" allows remote authenticated users to launch the Python debugger, and conse

CVE-2026-39987 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Apr 08

Unauthenticated remote code execution in Marimo ≤0.20.4 allows attackers to execute arbitrary system commands via the `/

CVE-2024-21645 MEDIUM POC
5.3 Jan 08

pyLoad is the free and open-source Download Manager written in pure Python. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.3), this vulne

CVE-2026-33017 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 17

Langflow (a visual LLM pipeline builder) contains a critical unauthenticated code execution vulnerability (CVE-2026-3301

CVE-2026-55255 HIGH POC
8.4 Jun 19

Cross-user flow execution in Langflow (< 1.9.1) lets any authenticated API-key holder run another user's flow by passing

Share

CVE-2026-44844 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy