Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as low-privilege Discourse user
-
DeliveryLocate visible reply to hidden parent post
-
ExploitInvoke AI 'explain' on visible reply
-
ExecutionAI helper fetches hidden reply_to_post without can_see? check
-
ImpactRead raw contents of hidden parent post
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid authenticated Discourse session with access to the AI 'explain' helper feature (PR:L per CVSS). The target instance must have the AI helper enabled (non-default configuration for many self-hosted instances). At least one hidden post must exist in a category the attacker can access, and that hidden post must have at least one visible reply that the attacker can target for the 'explain' invocation. Unauthenticated visitors cannot exploit this flaw. The confidentiality breach is limited to the raw text of a single hidden parent post per invocation - there is no known path to bulk enumeration of hidden content or access to posts in categories the attacker cannot otherwise reach. Deployments where no hidden posts exist or where AI helper access is limited to users who already have visibility into all posts face no meaningful exposure. |
| Impact | The CVSS 3.1 score of 4.3 (Medium) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N correctly characterizes this as a low-privilege, network-exploitable flaw with limited confidentiality impact - no integrity or availability consequences exist. The EPSS score of 0.03% at the 9th percentile, combined with the absence of a CISA KEV listing and no identified public POC, collectively indicate minimal near-term exploitation probability. Real-world risk is tightly bounded: attackers must hold a valid authenticated session and the AI helper must be enabled; unauthenticated users are entirely excluded. Impact is scoped to reading one hidden post per invocation - there is no privilege escalation, no lateral movement, and no bulk data exfiltration path identified. For most deployments, this is a low-urgency patch; for communities where hidden posts contain sensitive moderation notes, staff discussions, or user-reported data, the realistic risk is meaningfully higher than raw CVSS suggests because the bypassed content is specifically intended to be access-controlled. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated forum member navigates to any thread where a visible reply exists to a hidden or staff-only parent post. The attacker invokes the AI 'explain' feature on the visible reply, causing the AI backend to fetch and process the hidden parent post without a visibility check, returning its raw contents in the explanation response. No special tooling or exploit code is required - the attack is achievable through normal forum UI interactions by any user with access to the AI helper. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jun 12, 2026
Discourse's AI 'explain' helper exposes raw content of hidden posts to any authenticated user with access to the feature, due to an incomplete authorization check on parent posts. Affected instances span three release tracks - 2026.1.x, 2026.3.x, and 2026.4.x - and any user who can invoke the AI helper and find a visible reply to a hidden post can silently read the hidden post's raw text. No public exploit code has been identified and EPSS places exploitation probability at 0.03% (9th percentile), indicating this is a low-urgency but genuine confidentiality bypass for deployments where hidden post content is sensitive.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to one of the vendor-released patches: 2026.1.4 (for 2026.1.x installations), 2026.3.1 (for 2026.3.x), 2026.4.1 (for 2026.4.x), or 2026.5.0-latest.1 for rolling-latest deployments, as confirmed by GitHub Security Advisory GHSA-7h76-fwxc-j586 at https://github.com/discourse/discourse/security/advisories/GHSA-7h76-fwxc-j586. If an immediate upgrade is not feasible, administrators should disable the AI 'explain' helper feature entirely - this eliminates the attack surface at the cost of removing the AI assistance functionality for all users. As a narrower mitigating control, restricting AI helper access to staff-level or high-trust user groups reduces the pool of potential abusers but does not eliminate the underlying authorization bypass and should be treated as a temporary measure only.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 3 packages in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Discourse is an open-source forum platform (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:discourse:discourse) built around threaded post structures where posts can be explicitly hidden or restricted by moderators. The AI 'explain' helper is an add-on feature that sends a post's content to an AI backend to produce a plain-language explanation. The root cause is CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor): the helper applies a can_see? visibility check to the directly targeted post but fails to apply the same gate to reply_to_post - the parent post in the thread chain. When the AI feature fetches parent context for its explanation, it bypasses the visibility enforcement that governs normal post display, allowing the hidden post's raw content to surface in the AI response to an unprivileged caller.
Know when Discourse gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Network-accessible feature requires only a valid user session (PR:L); limited confidentiality impact reading one hidden post; no integrity or availability consequence.
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. From versions 2026.1.0-latest to before 2026.1.4, 2026.3.0-latest to before 2026.3.1, and 2026.4.0-latest to before 2026.4.1, the AI "explain" helper only checks can_see? on the post being explained, not its reply_to_post, so any authenticated user with access to the AI helper could read the raw contents of a hidden parent post by invoking "Explain" on a reply to it. This issue has been patched in versions 2026.1.4, 2026.3.1, 2026.4.1, and 2026.5.0-latest.1.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Discourse versions prior to 3.5.0.beta6 contain a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in social login fun
discourse-bbcode is the official BBCode plugin for Discourse. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is
Unauthorized information disclosure in Discourse discussion platform versions prior to 2026.3.0-latest.1, 2026.2.1, and
Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.2), this vulnerability is rem
Discourse versions prior to 2025.12.2, 2026.1.1, and 2026.2.0 contain an insecure direct object reference (IDOR) in the
In Discourse 2.7.0 through beta1, a rate-limit bypass leads to a bypass of the 2FA requirement for certain forms. Rated
Unauthenticated attackers can submit forged webhook payloads to multiple email provider integrations in Discourse versio
Discourse is an open-source discussion platform. Rated medium severity (CVSS 6.5), this vulnerability is remotely exploi
Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated medium severity (CVSS 5.9), this vulnerability is r
Discourse versions prior to 3.4.4 (stable), 3.5.0.beta5 (beta), and 3.5.0.beta6-dev (tests-passed) contain a critical vu
Discourse is an open source platform for community discussion. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is
Discourse Patreon enables syncronization between Discourse Groups and Patreon rewards. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8
EUVD-2026-36557
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB