Skip to main content

bitcoinj-core CVE-2026-44714

| EUVD-2026-30571 HIGH
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-05-08 https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj GHSA-hfcf-v2f8-x9pc
7.5
CVSS 3.1
Share

CVSS VectorNVD

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Source Code Evidence Fetched
May 08, 2026 - 18:01 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
May 08, 2026 - 18:01 vuln.today
CVE Published
May 08, 2026 - 17:43 nvd
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionNVD

Summary

ScriptExecution.correctlySpends() contains two fast-path verification bugs for standard P2PKH and native P2WPKH spends in core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/script/ScriptExecution.java.

In both branches, bitcoinj verifies an attacker-controlled signature/public-key pair but fails to verify that the public key is the one committed to by the output being spent. As a result, any attacker keypair can satisfy bitcoinj's local verification for arbitrary P2PKH and P2WPKH outputs.

This doesn't affect the SPV (simple payment verification) trust model, as this model follows PoW and doesn't verify input signatures at all.

Details

The issue is in the optimized branches of ScriptExecution.correctlySpends(...).

In the P2PKH fast path at core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/script/ScriptExecution.java:1042, the code:

  • parses the attacker-supplied signature from scriptSig
  • parses the attacker-supplied public key from scriptSig
  • computes the sighash against the victim output's scriptPubKey
  • checks only pubkey.verify(sigHash, signature)

It never enforces the missing P2PKH binding:

  • HASH160(pubkey) == ScriptPattern.extractHashFromP2PKH(scriptPubKey)

That means the OP_DUP OP_HASH160 <hash> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG semantics are not actually enforced in this fast path.

Relevant code:

java
} else if (ScriptPattern.isP2PKH(scriptPubKey)) {
    if (chunks.size() != 2)
        throw new ScriptException(...);
    TransactionSignature signature;
    try {
        byte[] data = Objects.requireNonNull(chunks.get(0).data);
        signature = TransactionSignature.decodeFromBitcoin(data, true, true);
    } catch (SignatureDecodeException x) {
        throw new ScriptException(...);
    }
    ECKey pubkey = ECKey.fromPublicOnly(Objects.requireNonNull(chunks.get(1).data));
    Sha256Hash sigHash = txContainingThis.hashForSignature(scriptSigIndex, scriptPubKey,
            signature.sigHashMode(), false);
    boolean validSig = pubkey.verify(sigHash, signature);
    if (!validSig)
        throw new ScriptException(...);
}

In the native P2WPKH fast path at core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/script/ScriptExecution.java:1023, the bug is similar. The code:

  • reads the attacker-supplied pubkey from witness
  • builds scriptCode from that attacker pubkey with ScriptBuilder.createP2PKHOutputScript(pubkey)
  • computes the BIP143 sighash using that attacker-derived scriptCode
  • verifies the signature against the attacker pubkey

It never enforces:

  • HASH160(pubkey) == ScriptPattern.extractHashFromP2WH(scriptPubKey)

So for P2WPKH, the attacker controls both the pubkey and the scriptCode used for signing.

Relevant code:

java
if (ScriptPattern.isP2WPKH(scriptPubKey)) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(witness);
    if (witness.getPushCount() < 2)
        throw new ScriptException(...);
    TransactionSignature signature;
    try {
        signature = TransactionSignature.decodeFromBitcoin(witness.getPush(0), true, true);
    } catch (SignatureDecodeException x) {
        throw new ScriptException(...);
    }
    ECKey pubkey = ECKey.fromPublicOnly(witness.getPush(1));
    Script scriptCode = ScriptBuilder.createP2PKHOutputScript(pubkey);
    Sha256Hash sigHash = txContainingThis.hashForWitnessSignature(scriptSigIndex, scriptCode, value,
            signature.sigHashMode(), false);
    boolean validSig = pubkey.verify(sigHash, signature);
    if (!validSig)
        throw new ScriptException(...);
}

Affected call sites include:

  • core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/core/TransactionInput.java:546
  • core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/wallet/Wallet.java:4520
  • core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/signers/LocalTransactionSigner.java:84
  • core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/signers/CustomTransactionSigner.java:77

These call sites use correctlySpends() for transaction/input validation and pre-signing checks. Any application that treats a successful result from this path as proof that a spend is valid is affected.

Fix

The issue is fixed on the release-0.17 branch via 2bc5653c41d260d840692bc554690d4d79208f9c, and on master via b575a682acf614b9ff95cacbdeb48f86c3ababe0. A 0.17.1 maintenance release has been made available on Maven Central.

AnalysisAI

Signature verification bypass in bitcoinj-core library allows attackers to forge Bitcoin transaction validations by exploiting fast-path optimization flaws in P2PKH and P2WPKH script execution. Versions 0.15 through 0.17.0 fail to verify that attacker-supplied public keys match the hash committed to in transaction outputs, enabling arbitrary keypairs to satisfy local transaction validation checks. …

Sign in for full analysis, threat intelligence, and remediation guidance.

RemediationAI

Within 24 hours: Identify all applications and systems using bitcoinj-core versions 0.15-0.17.0 (check pom.xml, build.gradle, or dependency manifests). Within 7 days: Upgrade bitcoinj-core to version 0.17.1 or later; verify fixes via GitHub commits 2bc5653c and b575a682. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps.

Share

CVE-2026-44714 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy