Skip to main content

bitcoinj-core CVE-2026-44714

| EUVDEUVD-2026-30571 HIGH
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature (CWE-347)
2026-05-08 https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj GHSA-hfcf-v2f8-x9pc
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory · only source for this CVE.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Source Code Evidence Fetched
May 08, 2026 - 18:01 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
May 08, 2026 - 18:01 vuln.today
CVE Published
May 08, 2026 - 17:43 nvd
HIGH 7.5

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

ScriptExecution.correctlySpends() contains two fast-path verification bugs for standard P2PKH and native P2WPKH spends in core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/script/ScriptExecution.java.

In both branches, bitcoinj verifies an attacker-controlled signature/public-key pair but fails to verify that the public key is the one committed to by the output being spent. As a result, any attacker keypair can satisfy bitcoinj's local verification for arbitrary P2PKH and P2WPKH outputs.

This doesn't affect the SPV (simple payment verification) trust model, as this model follows PoW and doesn't verify input signatures at all.

Details

The issue is in the optimized branches of ScriptExecution.correctlySpends(...).

In the P2PKH fast path at core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/script/ScriptExecution.java:1042, the code:

  • parses the attacker-supplied signature from scriptSig
  • parses the attacker-supplied public key from scriptSig
  • computes the sighash against the victim output's scriptPubKey
  • checks only pubkey.verify(sigHash, signature)

It never enforces the missing P2PKH binding:

  • HASH160(pubkey) == ScriptPattern.extractHashFromP2PKH(scriptPubKey)

That means the OP_DUP OP_HASH160 <hash> OP_EQUALVERIFY OP_CHECKSIG semantics are not actually enforced in this fast path.

Relevant code:

java
} else if (ScriptPattern.isP2PKH(scriptPubKey)) {
    if (chunks.size() != 2)
        throw new ScriptException(...);
    TransactionSignature signature;
    try {
        byte[] data = Objects.requireNonNull(chunks.get(0).data);
        signature = TransactionSignature.decodeFromBitcoin(data, true, true);
    } catch (SignatureDecodeException x) {
        throw new ScriptException(...);
    }
    ECKey pubkey = ECKey.fromPublicOnly(Objects.requireNonNull(chunks.get(1).data));
    Sha256Hash sigHash = txContainingThis.hashForSignature(scriptSigIndex, scriptPubKey,
            signature.sigHashMode(), false);
    boolean validSig = pubkey.verify(sigHash, signature);
    if (!validSig)
        throw new ScriptException(...);
}

In the native P2WPKH fast path at core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/script/ScriptExecution.java:1023, the bug is similar. The code:

  • reads the attacker-supplied pubkey from witness
  • builds scriptCode from that attacker pubkey with ScriptBuilder.createP2PKHOutputScript(pubkey)
  • computes the BIP143 sighash using that attacker-derived scriptCode
  • verifies the signature against the attacker pubkey

It never enforces:

  • HASH160(pubkey) == ScriptPattern.extractHashFromP2WH(scriptPubKey)

So for P2WPKH, the attacker controls both the pubkey and the scriptCode used for signing.

Relevant code:

java
if (ScriptPattern.isP2WPKH(scriptPubKey)) {
    Objects.requireNonNull(witness);
    if (witness.getPushCount() < 2)
        throw new ScriptException(...);
    TransactionSignature signature;
    try {
        signature = TransactionSignature.decodeFromBitcoin(witness.getPush(0), true, true);
    } catch (SignatureDecodeException x) {
        throw new ScriptException(...);
    }
    ECKey pubkey = ECKey.fromPublicOnly(witness.getPush(1));
    Script scriptCode = ScriptBuilder.createP2PKHOutputScript(pubkey);
    Sha256Hash sigHash = txContainingThis.hashForWitnessSignature(scriptSigIndex, scriptCode, value,
            signature.sigHashMode(), false);
    boolean validSig = pubkey.verify(sigHash, signature);
    if (!validSig)
        throw new ScriptException(...);
}

Affected call sites include:

  • core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/core/TransactionInput.java:546
  • core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/wallet/Wallet.java:4520
  • core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/signers/LocalTransactionSigner.java:84
  • core/src/main/java/org/bitcoinj/signers/CustomTransactionSigner.java:77

These call sites use correctlySpends() for transaction/input validation and pre-signing checks. Any application that treats a successful result from this path as proof that a spend is valid is affected.

Fix

The issue is fixed on the release-0.17 branch via 2bc5653c41d260d840692bc554690d4d79208f9c, and on master via b575a682acf614b9ff95cacbdeb48f86c3ababe0. A 0.17.1 maintenance release has been made available on Maven Central.

AnalysisAI

Signature verification bypass in bitcoinj-core library allows attackers to forge Bitcoin transaction validations by exploiting fast-path optimization flaws in P2PKH and P2WPKH script execution. Versions 0.15 through 0.17.0 fail to verify that attacker-supplied public keys match the hash committed to in transaction outputs, enabling arbitrary keypairs to satisfy local transaction validation checks. While this does not affect SPV (Simple Payment Verification) nodes that follow proof-of-work without signature verification, applications using the correctlySpends() method for transaction validation or pre-signing checks are vulnerable to accepting fraudulent transactions. Vendor-released patch available in version 0.17.1, fixes confirmed in GitHub commits 2bc5653c and b575a682. No active exploitation confirmed (not in CISA KEV); EPSS data unavailable.

Technical ContextAI

bitcoinj is a Java implementation of the Bitcoin protocol used by wallets and applications to interact with Bitcoin networks. The vulnerability resides in the ScriptExecution.correctlySpends() method's optimized fast-paths for two standard Bitcoin transaction types: Pay-to-PubKey-Hash (P2PKH) and native Pay-to-Witness-PubKey-Hash (P2WPKH). These fast-paths were designed to bypass full Bitcoin Script interpreter execution for performance, but introduced a critical logic error. In Bitcoin's UTXO model, outputs lock funds to a specific public key hash - the spender must provide a public key that hashes to that committed value. The vulnerable code verifies ECDSA signatures against attacker-supplied public keys but skips the crucial HASH160(pubkey) == committed_hash check mandated by Bitcoin's OP_EQUALVERIFY opcode semantics. For P2WPKH, the flaw is compounded because the attacker-controlled pubkey is used to construct the scriptCode for BIP143 signature hashing, allowing complete control over the verification context. This is classified as CWE-347 (Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature) because the cryptographic operation succeeds but lacks binding to the claimed identity. The affected CPE is pkg:maven/org.bitcoinj:bitcoinj-core covering versions ≥0.15 and <0.17.1.

RemediationAI

Upgrade org.bitcoinj:bitcoinj-core to version 0.17.1 or later, which contains fixes in commits 2bc5653c41d260d840692bc554690d4d79208f9c (release-0.17 branch) and b575a682acf614b9ff95cacbdeb48f86c3ababe0 (master branch). Update your Maven or Gradle dependency to 'org.bitcoinj:bitcoinj-core:0.17.1' - the patched version is available on Maven Central. For applications that cannot immediately upgrade, implement compensating controls by avoiding reliance on correctlySpends() return values for security-critical validation decisions in non-SPV contexts. Specifically, for any transaction acceptance or authorization logic outside standard SPV operation, add explicit verification that HASH160(extracted_pubkey) matches the committed hash in scriptPubKey for both P2PKH and P2WPKH spends before trusting correctlySpends() results. Note this workaround requires reimplementing the missing hash verification logic and has maintenance overhead risk. For applications using SPV trust model exclusively (following longest proof-of-work chain without local signature verification), no immediate action is required beyond normal upgrade cycles, as SPV operation is unaffected by this flaw. Vendor advisory and technical details: https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/security/advisories/GHSA-hfcf-v2f8-x9pc. Release information: https://github.com/bitcoinj/bitcoinj/releases/tag/v0.17.1.

CVE-2013-3900 MEDIUM
5.5 Dec 11

Why is Microsoft republishing a CVE from 2013? We are republishing CVE-2013-3900 in the Security Update Guide to update

CVE-2026-48558 CRITICAL POC
9.5 Jun 12

Authentication bypass in SimpleHelp 5.5.15 and prior (plus 6.0 pre-release builds) allows remote unauthenticated attacke

CVE-2025-59718 CRITICAL
9.8 Dec 09

Authentication bypass in Fortinet FortiOS, FortiProxy, and FortiSwitchManager allows unauthenticated remote attackers to

CVE-2025-25291 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2025-25292 CRITICAL POC
9.3 Mar 12

ruby-saml provides security assertion markup language (SAML) single sign-on (SSO) for Ruby. Rated critical severity (CVS

CVE-2022-25898 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 01

The package jsrsasign before 10.5.25 are vulnerable to Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature when JWS or JWT

CVE-2024-42004 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.2770.1094 for macOS. Rated criti

CVE-2024-41145 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the WebView.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work or school) 24046.2813.27

CVE-2024-41138 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 18

A library injection vulnerability exists in the com.microsoft.teams2.modulehost.app helper app of Microsoft Teams (work

CVE-2024-45409 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Sep 10

The Ruby SAML library is for implementing the client side of a SAML authorization. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), t

CVE-2022-35929 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 04

cosign is a container signing and verification utility. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remote

CVE-2022-31053 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jun 13

Biscuit is an authentication and authorization token for microservices architectures. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8)

Share

CVE-2026-44714 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy