Skip to main content

vLLM CVE-2026-41523

HIGH
Code Injection (CWE-94)
2026-06-16 https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm GHSA-q8gq-377p-jq3r
7.5
CVSS 3.1 · GitHub Advisory
Share

Severity by source

GitHub Advisory PRIMARY
7.5 HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI
7.5 HIGH

Attacker is a remote unauthenticated model publisher (AV:N/PR:N) but victim must load the model and run vLLM under -O (UI:R, AC:H); successful exploit yields full process compromise (C:H/I:H/A:H).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from GitHub Advisory.

CVSS VectorGitHub Advisory

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Source Code Evidence Fetched
Jun 16, 2026 - 18:20 vuln.today
Analysis Generated
Jun 16, 2026 - 18:20 vuln.today
CVE Published
Jun 16, 2026 - 17:34 github-advisory
HIGH 7.5

Blast Radius

ecosystem impact
† from your stack dependencies † transitive graph · vuln.today resolves 4-path depth
  • 1 pypi packages depend on vllm (1 direct, 0 indirect)

Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 0.22.0.

DescriptionGitHub Advisory

Summary

An assert-based security check in vLLM's activation function loading allows any unauthenticated attacker to achieve arbitrary code execution on the server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM runs in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1).

Details

vLLM uses an assert statement at vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:48 as its sole security control to restrict which activation functions can be loaded from a HuggingFace model's config.json:

python
# vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py:35-53
function_name: str | None = None
if (
    hasattr(config, "sentence_transformers")
    and "activation_fn" in config.sentence_transformers
):
    function_name = config.sentence_transformers["activation_fn"]
elif (
    hasattr(config, "sbert_ce_default_activation_function")
    and config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function is not None
):
    function_name = config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function

if function_name is not None:
    assert function_name.startswith("torch.nn.modules."), (
        "Loading of activation functions is restricted to "
        "torch.nn.modules for security reasons"
    )
    fn = resolve_obj_by_qualname(function_name)()

Python's assert statements are stripped at compile time when running in optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). When the assert is absent, the attacker-controlled function_name from the model's config.json is passed directly to resolve_obj_by_qualname() - an unrestricted import gadget:

python
def resolve_obj_by_qualname(qualname: str) -> Any:
    module_name, obj_name = qualname.rsplit(".", 1)
    module = importlib.import_module(module_name)
    return getattr(module, obj_name)

This is the same vulnerability class as CVE-2017-1000433 (pysaml2 assert-based auth bypass), flagged by Bandit B101 and Ruff S101, and the reason Django proactively replaced all assert-based security checks (ticket #32508).

Attacker-controlled input sources:

  • config.sentence_transformers["activation_fn"] (line 40)
  • config.sbert_ce_default_activation_function (line 45)

Affected call sites - get_act_fn() is called via resolve_classifier_act_fn() from:

  • vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/seqwise/poolers.py:122 - SequencePooler
  • vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/tokwise/poolers.py:130 - TokenPooler

Broader systemic risk: resolve_obj_by_qualname is called from ~20 locations across the codebase with no validation of its own. Any future caller feeding user-controlled input to it without validation creates the same vulnerability class.

Suggested fix: Replace the assert with an explicit conditional raise:

python
if not function_name.startswith("torch.nn.modules."):
    raise ValueError(
        "Loading of activation functions is restricted to "
        "torch.nn.modules for security reasons"
    )

Impact

Arbitrary code execution. A malicious model author publishes a HuggingFace model with a crafted config.json. When a victim loads this model with vLLM running under python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1, arbitrary code executes during model initialization with the privileges of the vLLM process.

The attack requires:

  1. Victim loads a malicious model from HuggingFace (user interaction)
  2. vLLM runs under python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 (documented in production use)
  3. Model uses a cross-encoder architecture (e.g. BERT or RoBERTa with sequence classification)

Coordinated disclosure note: This vulnerability was also reported via huntr.com on April 2, 2026 (https://huntr.com/bounties/dcb05b04-e625-41e7-adbc-bbae0cc2d64c). A GitHub Security Advisory was also filed because it is vLLM's stated preferred disclosure channel per SECURITY.md.

Fix

A fix for this was introduced in this commit: https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/commit/b3c7ffcab82c2439726f8cb213800f6f38c023d3

AnalysisAI

Arbitrary code execution in vLLM versions prior to 0.22.0 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to run code on the inference server by publishing a malicious HuggingFace model, when vLLM is launched in Python optimized mode (python -O or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1). The sole guardrail restricting which activation function classes can be loaded from a model's config.json is implemented with a Python assert, which is stripped at compile time under -O, leaving an unrestricted import gadget directly fed by attacker-controlled data. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

Free forever · No credit card required

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Access
Publish malicious HuggingFace model
Delivery
Victim loads model under python -O
Exploit
Pooler reads attacker activation_fn string
Execution
Stripped assert skips allowlist check
Persist
resolve_obj_by_qualname imports attacker module
Impact
Arbitrary code executes as vLLM process

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation Exploitation requires three concrete preconditions, all explicitly stated in the advisory: (1) the vLLM Python process must be launched with optimization enabled - either 'python -O' or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 in the environment - so the assert-based allowlist is removed at compile time; (2) the victim must load an attacker-controlled HuggingFace model whose config.json populates either sentence_transformers.activation_fn or sbert_ce_default_activation_function (user-interaction step, matching CVSS UI:R); and (3) the model must use a cross-encoder architecture (e.g. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment The vendor-issued CVSS 3.1 score of 7.5 with vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H captures the trade-off well: the impact is full arbitrary code execution as the vLLM process (C:H/I:H/A:H), but AC:H, UI:R and the requirement that the target process be started with -O/PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 plus loading a cross-encoder architecture mean exploitation is not a one-shot internet-wide bug. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario An attacker publishes a HuggingFace cross-encoder model whose config.json sets sentence_transformers.activation_fn (or sbert_ce_default_activation_function) to a fully qualified Python name outside torch.nn.modules - for example, a module whose import side effect spawns a reverse shell. A victim operator running vLLM under python -O (or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1) loads the model by name; during pooler initialization the stripped assert no longer enforces the allowlist, and resolve_obj_by_qualname() imports the attacker's module and calls getattr() on it, executing arbitrary code in the vLLM process. …
Remediation Vendor-released patch: upgrade vLLM to 0.22.0 or later, which replaces the assert with an explicit 'if not function_name.startswith("torch.nn.modules."): raise ValueError(...)' in vllm/model_executor/layers/pooler/activations.py (commit b3c7ffcab82c2439726f8cb213800f6f38c023d3, advisory https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/security/advisories/GHSA-q8gq-377p-jq3r). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Recommended ActionAI

Within 24 hours: Identify all vLLM deployments and determine if Python optimized mode is enabled (check for -O flag or PYTHONOPTIMIZE=1 environment variable); review recent model downloads from external sources. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

Share

CVE-2026-41523 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy