Skip to main content

Slican IPx CVE-2026-35088

| EUVDEUVD-2026-101950 HIGH
Inadequate Encryption Strength (CWE-326)
2026-10-15 CERT-PL GHSA-wfcf-hvq2-76r6
8.2
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: CERT-PL
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain Slican firmware binaries
  2. Exploit
    Extract hardcoded symmetric key
  3. Execution
    Intercept TCP/IP traffic
  4. Impact
    Decrypt confidential communications

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A04:2025 - Cryptographic Failures
ASVS 5.0
V11 - Cryptography Encryption strength requirements
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two concrete prerequisites: (1) access to one of the affected Slican firmware binaries to extract the static hardcoded symmetric key (trivial once any copy of the device or firmware is available, since the key is shared across installations), and (2) a position to capture the encrypted TCP/IP communications of the target exchange (passive sniffing or MITM on the management/signalling network). The limiting factor is the traffic-capture requirement (reflected as AT:P in the CVSS 4.0 vector), not the cryptography itself. For the IPx series, upgrading to version 6.62.0100 removes the condition; for the EOL models CCT-1668, MAC-6400, and CXS-0424 no software remediation exists and a hardware upgrade (via the vendor's service department) is required, so the condition persists indefinitely for those deployments.

Impact

This is a cryptographic weakness (CWE-326) rooted in a hardcoded symmetric key embedded in multiple Slican firmware binaries, allowing decryption of TCP/IP communications. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H) is consistent with the description: no authentication is required (PR:N) and confidentiality impact is high (VC:H), but the AT:P flag correctly signals that exploitation is not turnkey - the attacker must both obtain the key-bearing binaries and be positioned to capture the encrypted traffic. The composite 8.2 (High) score is therefore driven almost entirely by a confidentiality-only impact (VI:N/VA:N); there is no code execution, tampering, or availability loss. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code were provided, so by the precision rules this is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - meaning the real-world urgency is lower than the 8.2 headline suggests. The practical risk is concentrated in the three End-Of-Life models (CCT-1668, MAC-6400, CXS-0424) which cannot be patched in software and require a hardware upgrade; the IPx series is remediated in 6.62.0100. Note a limitation: the input gives only a CVSS 4.0 vector (no 3.1 vector, no EPSS, no POC/KEV signals to cross-reference), so exploitation likelihood is inferred from the vector and description rather than confirmed by exploitation telemetry.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker extracts the shared hardcoded symmetric key from a Slican firmware binary (obtainable from any copy of the affected device or its firmware) and uses it to passively decrypt previously captured or intercepted TCP/IP traffic to/from the telephone exchange, exposing confidential signalling and call-management data. Because the key is static across devices, one extraction compromises all affected deployments. No public exploit code was identified in the provided data; the barrier is traffic-capture positioning, not cryptographic difficulty.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 15, 2026

Slican telephone exchanges encrypt their TCP/IP signalling and management traffic with a symmetric key that is hardcoded in multiple firmware binaries, so anyone who obtains a single firmware image or device copy can decrypt that traffic on any installation using the same key. The issue is fixed in IPx series version 6.62.0100; CVSS 4.0 rates it 8.2 with attack prerequisites (AT:P) because exploitation also requires a position to capture the encrypted traffic (passive sniffing or MITM on the exchange's network). Three discontinued models - CCT-1668 (CCT1CPU), MAC-6400 and CXS-0424, discontinued in 2011 and 2012 - remain permanently affected because they cannot receive a software fix and require a hardware upgrade. There is no confirmed active exploitation (not in CISA KEV) and no public exploit identified at time of analysis; the impact is confidentiality-only (high), with no integrity or availability effect.

RemediationAI

Vendor-released patch: upgrade Slican IPx series exchanges to version 6.62.0100, which removes the hardcoded-key condition for that platform. For the EOL models CCT-1668, MAC-6400 and CXS-0424 no vendor-released patch exists and none will be issued; the vendor's stated path is a hardware upgrade, and users should contact Slican's service department directly to determine upgrade options. Because the residual exposure on EOL devices is indefinite, compensating controls must address the traffic-capture prerequisite: place exchange management and signalling traffic on a dedicated, isolated VLAN or separate L2/L3 segment with strict ACLs so that no untrusted host can passively observe or MITM it (trade-off: limits management access paths and requires network re-architecture, but removes the easiest capture position), and tunnel any remote management or inter-node traffic through an independently encrypted transport such as IPsec or SSH/TLS so that captured frames are not usable even if the hardcoded key is recovered (trade-off: added configuration complexity, latency and CPU overhead). Restrict physical and network access to the exchange and to firmware images, since possession of any copy of the firmware is sufficient to extract the shared key (trade-off: firmware distribution must be tightly controlled, which complicates field service). Where the confidentiality requirement cannot be met by segmentation and tunnelling, plan migration to a supported platform rather than relying on the EOL device. See the CERT-PL advisory at https://cert.pl/posts/2026/10/CVE-2026-35088 for further detail.

Affected VersionsENISA

CXS-0424 0 ≤6.30.0510
MAC-6400 0 ≤6.56.0430
ipx 0 <6.62.0100
CCT-1668 0 ≤6.56.0430

Affected Packages

euvd cct_1668 no fix
euvd cxs_0424 no fix
euvd ipx fix: 6.62.0100
euvd mac_6400 no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 4 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

The root cause is CWE-326 (Inadequate Encryption Strength), realized as a static symmetric secret embedded directly in several Slican firmware binaries rather than derived per-device or provisioned in the field. Because the key is identical across deployments of the affected product lines, the cryptographic protection of the TCP/IP channel collapses to the secrecy of the firmware, and a single leaked or extracted binary compromises every exchange that uses it - no per-target reverse engineering is needed. This is a classic hardcoded-key design failure: the protocol may use a sound cipher, but the key management model makes the ciphertext effectively recoverable by an adversary who can read the firmware and observe the wire. CPE data confirms four affected products - slican:ipx, slican:cct-1668, slican:mac-6400 and slican:cxs-0424. Exploitation is passive and non-destructive: the attacker extracts the key from firmware or a device copy, then captures TCP/IP traffic on the exchange's management/signalling network (or MITMs it) and decrypts it, yielding configuration and call/signalling data. The CVSS 4.0 vector's AT:P (attack prerequisites) and the independent CVSS 3.1 assessment (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N) both reflect the same limiting factor - network capture position - rather than any complexity in the cryptography itself.

Know when Ipx gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (CERT-PL) PRIMARY 8.2 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 5.9 MEDIUM

AC:H because the attacker must capture the encrypted traffic in addition to extracting the shared key; PR:N/UI:N as key extraction needs no auth; impact is confidentiality-only (C:H, I:N, A:N).

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (CERT-PL).

CVSS VectorVendor: CERT-PL

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
Present
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
High
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
Low
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 15, 2026 - 10:16 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 15, 2026 - 09:00 cve.org
HIGH 8.2

DescriptionCVE.org

Slican telephone exchanges use symmetric encryption for TCP/IP communication. Secret key is hardcoded in multiple binary files. An attacker who has access to these files can decrypt the communication.

This issue was fixed in IPx series version 6.62.0100.

The issue STILL EXISTS in End-Of-Life telephone exchanges:

  • CCT-1668 (CCT1CPU)
  • MAC-6400
  • CXS-0424

These products were discontinued in 2011 and 2012 and and will not receive updates. These products require a hardware update in order to receive a software update. The vendor recommends that users of these devices contact the their service department directly to determine the options for upgrading.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Slican telephone exchanges, including discontinued CCT-1668 (CCT1CPU), MAC-6400, and CXS-0424 models, use a hardcoded symmetric key that can expose TCP/IP signalling and management traffic to decryption by anyone who obtains a firmware image or device copy and can capture network traffic. This creates a confidentiality risk for affected organizations, particularly those relying on legacy hardware that cannot be patched, and may lead to exposure of sensitive communications and management data. Leadership should prioritize inventory, network isolation, and replacement planning for unsupported models.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Vendor-released patch: IPx series version 6.62.0100 for supported IPx series devices. For discontinued CCT-1668 (CCT1CPU), MAC-6400, and CXS-0424 models, no vendor-released patch is identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include strict network segmentation and management VLAN isolation, ACLs that block unauthorized capture or man-in-the-middle positions, physical access restrictions, disabling unused management services, monitoring for anomalous traffic, and planning hardware replacement.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 98% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche Polish PBX vendor, limited and industry-specific telecom deployment footprint
Social Media
3
Sightings
Data Quality
6 sources
Confidence: High

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

41
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +41
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy