Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with application write permissions
-
DeliveryInject shell metacharacters into dockerfile_location/deploy command
-
ExploitTrigger application deployment
-
ExecutionCoolify executes injected command on host
-
PersistRead environment variables and run arbitrary code
-
ImpactExfiltrate secrets via deployment logs
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization OS command sanitization, avoid shell exec
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated Coolify account holding application write permissions on at least one application (PR:L) and the ability to modify deployment-related fields - specifically dockerfile_location or deployment commands - then trigger a deployment. There is no user-interaction requirement (UI:N) and the Coolify management interface must be network-reachable to the attacker (AV:N). Limiting factors that reduce real-world risk: the attacker cannot be fully anonymous - they must already possess deploy/write access, so single-operator instances or instances where write access is tightly held are far less exposed than multi-tenant or team deployments with lower-trust members. All Coolify versions before 4.0.0-beta.469 in default configuration are affected once that permission level is obtained. |
| Impact | This is a genuine high-priority issue rather than an inflated high-CVSS score. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H = 9.9) indicates network-reachable, low-complexity exploitation requiring only low privileges (an authenticated user with application write permissions) and no user interaction, with full confidentiality/integrity/availability impact amplified by a scope change. The principal limiting factor is authentication: the attacker must already hold application write permissions, so this is more of a privilege-escalation/tenant-breakout risk than an anonymous internet-wide RCE - relevant for multi-user Coolify instances, teams with limited-trust members, or any environment where a lower-privileged deploy account could be phished or compromised. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or POC was provided in the input, so real-world exploitation frequency cannot be quantified from available data; the CWE-78 class and the trivial exploitation mechanics nonetheless make weaponization straightforward once details are public. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A team member (or a compromised/low-trust account) that has been granted application write permissions on a shared Coolify instance edits an application's deployment settings, placing shell metacharacters and an injected command in the dockerfile_location or deployment command field. When the deployment runs, Coolify's build pipeline executes the injected command on the host, allowing the attacker to run arbitrary code and read environment variables of other applications, which are then visible in the deployment logs. No public POC was identified at time of analysis, and the low attack complexity (AC:L) means the technique is straightforward once the injectable field is known. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 06, 2026
Remote command injection in Coolify (self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.469 lets an authenticated user with application write permissions inject OS commands through deployment-handling fields such as dockerfile_location, achieving arbitrary code execution on the deployment host and exfiltrating secrets via deployment logs. The flaw scores CVSS 9.9 because command injection breaks out of the application context to compromise the underlying server (scope change), exposing environment variables and other applications' secrets. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, but the fix is available in tagged release v4.0.0-beta.469.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: upgrade to Coolify 4.0.0-beta.469 or later (tagged release https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify/releases/tag/v4.0.0-beta.469; advisory https://github.com/coollabsio/coolify/security/advisories/GHSA-qqrq-r9h4-x6wp). This is the primary and recommended fix. If you cannot upgrade immediately, reduce exposure by tightening who holds application write permissions - remove or downgrade untrusted team members and service accounts, since exploitation requires that privilege - and audit deployment configurations for suspicious values in dockerfile_location and custom deployment command fields. Restrict network access to the Coolify dashboard/API to trusted operators (e.g., behind a VPN or IP allowlist) to shrink the attacker population, accepting the trade-off of less convenient remote administration. Review recent deployment logs for signs of injected commands or leaked environment variables, and rotate any secrets that may have been exposed through those logs.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
Coolify is an open-source, self-hostable alternative to Heroku/Netlify/Vercel that orchestrates Docker-based deployments of applications and databases across managed servers. The root cause is CWE-78 (OS Command Injection): user-controllable deployment parameters - notably dockerfile_location and deployment commands - are passed into shell command construction during the build/deploy pipeline without adequate sanitization, so shell metacharacters break out of the intended command. Because deployments run with the privileges of Coolify's deployment engine on the target host (typically with Docker/root-level access), injected commands execute in that trusted context. The affected package is coollabsio/coolify (cpe:2.3:a:coollabsio:coolify), and the CVSS scope-change flag (S:C) reflects that the injection escapes the per-application boundary to affect the host and other tenants' resources.
Know when Coolify gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Network-reachable dashboard (AV:N), trivial injection (AC:L), needs authenticated app-write user (PR:L), no interaction (UI:N); injection escapes app to host affecting other tenants (S:C) with full C/I/A loss.
Primary rating from Vendor (GitHub_M).
CVSS VectorVendor: GitHub_M
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
Coolify is an open-source and self-hostable tool for managing servers, applications, and databases. Prior to 4.0.0-beta.469, an authenticated remote command injection vulnerability in application deployment handling allows users with application write permissions to achieve remote code execution and exfiltrate sensitive environment variables through deployment logs via fields such as dockerfile_location and deployment commands. This issue is fixed in version 4.0.0-beta.469.
Executive ViewAI
Coolify, a self-hosted deployment platform, contains a critical vulnerability that allows users with deployment permissions to gain control of production servers and access shared credentials and secrets. This creates immediate risk of infrastructure compromise, data breach, and application disruption from both malicious insiders and compromised user accounts.
Apply vendor patch: upgrade to Coolify v4.0.0-beta.469 or later.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
OS command injection occurs when an application passes unsanitized user input directly into system shell commands.
Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.
Cross-team authorization bypass in Coolify (open-source self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.474 allows an authenticated,
Coolify versions prior to v4.0.0-beta.420.7 are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability in the project deplo
Coolify versions prior to v4.0.0-beta.420.6 are vulnerable to a remote code execution vulnerability in the application d
Command injection in Coolify up to and including v4.0.0-beta.434 lets any authenticated low-privileged 'member' execute
Remote code execution on the host OS is possible through Coolify's application deployment workflow prior to version 4.0.
Authenticated command injection in Coolify's PostgreSQL initialization-script filename handling allows users with applic
Coolify versions prior to 4.0.0-beta.451 pass user-supplied database names unsanitized into shell commands executed via
Authenticated Coolify users who hold application or service management permissions can execute arbitrary commands as roo
Authenticated command injection in Coolify before 4.0.0-beta.451 lets users with application or service management permi
Stored cross-site scripting in Coolify versions up to and including v4.0.0-beta.420.6 lets an authenticated low-privileg
Authenticated OS command injection in Coolify before 4.0.0-beta.471 lets any user holding destination management permiss
Authenticated remote code execution in Coolify (self-hosted PaaS) before 4.0.0-beta.470 lets a low-privileged authentica
EUVD-2026-41943
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB