Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessControl or impersonate configured primary
-
DeliverySecondary forwards DNS UPDATE to rogue primary
-
ExploitRogue primary triggers FD leak per request
-
ExecutionFile descriptors exhausted on secondary
-
ImpactDenial of service on authoritative server
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V2 - Validation and Business Logic Resource consumption limits
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Impact The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the target to run PowerDNS Authoritative as a SECONDARY configured to forward DNS UPDATE requests to a primary (DNS update forwarding enabled - not a default posture), AND the attacker to control or impersonate that primary server (the 'rogue primary'). The limiting factors are therefore: the update-forwarding feature must be active, and the attacker must occupy the primary role that the secondary already trusts/forwards to, which bounds exploitation to specific deployment topologies rather than any internet-facing PowerDNS instance. Only availability is affected (no data disclosure or modification); only versions 5.0.0-5.0.3 and 4.9.0-4.9.13 are vulnerable. |
| Impact | Signals point to a genuine but conditional availability risk rather than a broadly urgent one. The vendor CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, base 7.5) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity, no-privilege, availability-only impact, which raises the paper severity. However, that network/no-privilege framing reflects that the malicious party is a rogue PRIMARY server; actual exploitation depends on the target PowerDNS secondary being configured to forward DNS UPDATE requests to that primary, so the real-world reach is narrower than AV:N/PR:N alone suggests. The other signals all point lower: EPSS is 0.02% (4th percentile), SSVC reports Exploitation: none and Automatable: no with only partial technical impact, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public exploit code is referenced. These are consistent with each other, not conflicting - low exploitation probability aligns with the no-KEV, automatable:no picture. The vuln.today priority of this_week and the confidentiality/integrity impact of none (A:H only) frame this as a prompt-but-scheduled patch for affected deployments rather than an emergency: a real priority for operators running secondaries that forward updates, and lower priority for everyone else. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An operator runs a PowerDNS Authoritative secondary configured to forward DNS UPDATE requests to its primary. An attacker who controls (or impersonates) that primary responds in a way that causes the secondary to leak/exhaust file descriptors on each forwarded update, until the secondary runs out and stops serving. No public exploit code is referenced; this is an availability-only denial of service with no code execution. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv2 – Oct 26, 2026
PowerDNS Authoritative secondary servers configured to forward DNS UPDATE requests to a primary can be driven into file descriptor exhaustion - and eventually a denial of service - when the primary they forward to is rogue or attacker-controlled. Only availability is affected (no confidentiality or integrity impact), and exploitation is unauthenticated from the network (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H, 7.5); however, it is conditional on a non-default deployment posture, since the update-forwarding feature must be active and the attacker must occupy the trusted primary role, which is why CISA SSVC rates automation as 'no' and technical impact as 'partial'. Versions 4.9.0 through 4.9.13 and 5.0.0 through 5.0.3 are affected, with fixes in 4.9.14 and 5.0.4; EPSS is low (0.02%, 4th percentile) and no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.
Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
Denial of service in PowerDNS secondary servers occurs when a rogue primary server sends crafted DNS update requests that cause file descriptor exhaustion on the secondary, eventually rendering the secondary unable to process legitimate DNS queries. The attack requires network-level coordination between a compromised or attacker-controlled primary server and a target secondary server, with moderate attack complexity due to the need to establish a primary-secondary relationship. No active exploitation has been confirmed in CISA KEV at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
Upgrade to the vendor-fixed releases: PowerDNS Authoritative 4.9.14 on the 4.9 branch or 5.0.4 on the 5.0 branch, per the PowerDNS security advisory at https://docs.powerdns.com/authoritative/security-advisories/powerdns-advisory-powerdns-2026-05.html. Because the flaw requires the secondary to forward DNS UPDATE requests to a rogue primary, the practical compensating control is to disable DNS update forwarding on secondary servers that do not need it, or to restrict forwarding to explicitly trusted, tightly controlled primary addresses - the trade-off being that legitimate primary-initiated update propagation stops working where forwarding is turned off. Raising the process file descriptor limit is only a stopgap that delays exhaustion and does not remove the leak. The vendor rates this 'this_week' priority; no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis, and CISA SSVC marks exploitation as none with automation as no.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
PowerDNS Authoritative is a DNS nameserver that can operate as a primary (master) or secondary (slave). In secondary mode with DNS update forwarding enabled, the server relays DNS UPDATE messages it receives toward a configured primary and holds resources awaiting the response. The flaw is classified as CWE-400 (Uncontrolled Resource Consumption): a rogue primary can drive the secondary to consume file descriptors without bound, exhausting the per-process descriptor table and degrading or halting the service. The advisory does not describe the precise trigger sequence beyond the rogue-primary update-forwarding interaction, so the exact descriptor-leaking path is not detailed in the available sources. The deployment conditions bound the risk: update forwarding is not a default posture, and the attacker must control or impersonate the primary that the secondary already trusts and forwards to, so exposure is limited to specific secondary topologies rather than arbitrary internet-facing instances. Per the CPE data (cpe:2.3:a:powerdns:authoritative), the affected branches are 4.9.x up to 4.9.13 and 5.0.x up to 5.0.3.
Know when Powerdns gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Attacker acts as a network-reachable rogue primary needing no privileges on the target, availability-only impact (FD exhaustion → DoS), no confidentiality/integrity effect; forwarding-config dependence is a deployment constraint, not a per-attack requirement.
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
6DescriptionNVD
A rogue primary server may cause file descriptor exhaustion and eventually a denial of service, when a PowerDNS secondary server forwards a DNS update request to it.
Executive ViewAI
PowerDNS Authoritative secondary servers in certain configurations can be forced into a denial-of-service condition by a rogue primary server, affecting only service availability. While exploitation requires a non-default setup and a compromised upstream, any disruption could impact dependent DNS resolution and business operations. Leadership should prioritize patching to maintain service resilience.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
PowerDNS (aka pdns) Authoritative Server before 3.4.10 does not properly handle a . Rated high severity (CVSS 7.5), this
PowerDNS (aka pdns) Authoritative Server before 3.4.10 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (backend CPU
A vulnerability was found in PowerDNS Authoritative Server before 4.0.7 and before 4.1.7. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8)
PowerDNS Authoritative Server 4.5.0 before 4.5.1 allows anybody to crash the process by sending a specific query (QTYPE
The resolver in PowerDNS Recursor (aka pdns_recursor) 3.3 overwrites cached server names and TTL values in NS records du
Remote attackers can corrupt PowerDNS Authoritative Server configuration via specially crafted DNS NOTIFY requests, caus
An issue was discovered in PowerDNS Authoritative through 4.3.0 when --enable-experimental-gss-tsig is used. Rated criti
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor versions 4.1.x before 4.1.9 where records in the answer section of response
Out-of-bounds memory read in dnsdist allows remote attackers to trigger information disclosure or denial of service when
dnsdist version 1.1.0 is vulnerable to a flaw in authentication mechanism for REST API potentially allowing CSRF attack.
An issue has been found in PowerDNS Recursor 4.1.0 up to and including 4.3.0. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulne
Denial of service in PowerDNS Authoritative DNS server (versions 4.9.0-4.9.14 and 5.0.0-5.0.4) arises from insufficient
EUVD-2026-24949
GHSA-7rv6-r2fm-295c
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB