Skip to main content

evolution-data-server CVE-2026-2604

| EUVDEUVD-2026-37506 MEDIUM
External Control of File Name or Path (CWE-73)
2026-06-16 redhat
5.6
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Flatpak app obtains D-Bus session access
  2. Delivery
    Craft path-traversal URI as contact field
  3. Exploit
    Submit contact via EDS D-Bus API (creation-time check bypassed)
  4. Execution
    Social-engineer user to delete the contact
  5. Persist
    EDS deletion-time weak check processes traversal URI
  6. Impact
    Arbitrary host file deleted (e.g., Flatpak override file)

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A06:2025 - Insecure Design
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling File name/path control
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a Flatpak application that has been explicitly granted access to the host D-Bus session (i.e., --socket=session-bus or equivalent D-Bus policy override in the Flatpak manifest or user override file). This is a non-default Flatpak permission - applications must have been configured with this access, either by the distributor or by the user. Additionally, a human user must trigger contact deletion through an EDS-integrated client (UI:R per CVSS), meaning the attacker cannot fully automate the destructive step without social engineering. The attack is constrained to local session scope (AV:L) and requires low-privilege caller access (PR:L). Exploitation is limited by the Flatpak D-Bus access requirement (non-default), mandatory user interaction for the deletion trigger, and the fact that the attacker can only delete files - not read or overwrite them (C:N in CVSS). Non-Flatpak deployments or systems that do not expose EDS over D-Bus to Flatpak sandboxes are not affected by this attack path.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.6 (AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L) accurately reflects a medium-severity, locally-scoped flaw. The local attack vector (AV:L) and required low privilege (PR:L) constrain exploitation to scenarios where an attacker already controls a Flatpak application with D-Bus session access - a non-trivial prerequisite. User interaction (UI:R) further limits opportunistic exploitation, as a human must trigger the contact deletion action. The high integrity impact (I:H) is the most significant signal: deletion of Flatpak override files could persistently weaken application sandboxing without user awareness, making this more than a simple file-deletion nuisance. No EPSS score was provided, and this CVE does not appear in CISA KEV, meaning no confirmed in-the-wild exploitation is known. No POC has been identified. Despite the relatively modest CVSS score, the potential to silently erode Flatpak sandbox controls elevates the real-world concern for desktop Linux environments heavily reliant on Flatpak containment as a security boundary.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker distributes or controls a Flatpak application that has been granted D-Bus session access to evolution-data-server. The application calls the EDS D-Bus API to create or modify a contact, supplying a URI such as 'file:///home/user/.local/share/flatpak/overrides/../../../../.local/share/flatpak/overrides/com.example.App' containing traversal sequences that pass the creation-time validation check. When the victim subsequently deletes the manipulated contact through any EDS-integrated application (e.g., GNOME Contacts), the deletion-time path check fails to reject the traversal, and the targeted Flatpak override file is silently removed from the host filesystem - potentially widening the sandbox permissions of other Flatpak applications on subsequent launch.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jun 17, 2026

Arbitrary file deletion in evolution-data-server's addressbook file backend exposes host filesystem to manipulation by a Flatpak application with D-Bus access. The vulnerability exploits split validation logic: a crafted URI embedding directory traversal sequences (e.g., '../') is accepted without sufficient sanitization during contact creation or modification, but when the same URI is later processed at deletion time, a second, less restrictive check fails to catch the traversal - allowing files outside the intended addressbook directory to be removed. Critically, deletion of Flatpak override files could be leveraged to silently weaken sandbox restrictions for subsequent application runs. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Apply the updated evolution-data-server package as released via Red Hat's security errata for the affected RHEL versions; consult https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-2604 and Bugzilla #2440301 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2440301) for specific package versions and errata identifiers. No exact fixed version number is independently confirmed from the available data - verify the fix version directly from Red Hat's advisory before deploying. As a compensating control pending patch availability, administrators can revoke or restrict D-Bus access for untrusted Flatpak applications by auditing and tightening Flatpak D-Bus policy overrides; note this may break legitimate EDS-integrated functionality in affected apps. Additionally, protecting critical Flatpak override directories (e.g., ~/.local/share/flatpak/overrides/) with filesystem ACLs or inotify-based monitoring can provide early warning of unauthorized deletions, though it does not prevent them. Patch is the only definitive fix.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

evolution-data-server (EDS) is the GNOME backend data service providing addressbook, calendar, and task storage via D-Bus IPC. Its addressbook file backend stores contact records indexed by URIs pointing to on-disk vCard files. CWE-73 (External Control of File Name or Path) describes the root cause: the application allows user-controlled input - here a D-Bus-supplied URI - to influence file path resolution without consistent normalization across all code paths. Because Flatpak applications are sandboxed but may be granted explicit D-Bus access to host services including EDS, a malicious or compromised Flatpak app can interact with the EDS D-Bus interface as a low-privilege local caller. The inconsistency between the creation-time check and the deletion-time check is the exploitable gap: the stricter check at write time creates a false sense of security, while the lax check at delete time becomes the exploitable path. Affected products per CPE data span Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 5.6 MEDIUM
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
vuln.today AI 5.6 MEDIUM

Local vector and low privileges reflect Flatpak D-Bus caller requirement; UI:R captures mandatory user-triggered deletion; C:N because only deletion, not disclosure, is possible.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:L
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
SUSE MEDIUM
Red Hat 5.6 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
Low

DescriptionCVE.org

A flaw was found in evolution-data-server. Inconsistent comparison logic in the addressbook file backend allows a Flatpak application with D-Bus access to craft a malicious URI containing directory traversal sequences. This URI is stored without proper validation during contact creation or modification. Later, during contact deletion, the URI is processed with a less strict check, leading to the deletion of arbitrary files on the host filesystem. This could potentially include critical Flatpak override files.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment Vendor CIRCL VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

28
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

Vendor StatusVendor

SUSE

Severity: Moderate
Product Status
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 15 SP7 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 15 SP7 SUSE Linux Enterprise Server for SAP Applications 15 SP7 SUSE Linux Enterprise Workstation Extension 15 SP7 Fixed
SUSE Linux Enterprise Module for Package Hub 15 SP7 Fixed
openSUSE Leap 15.6 Fixed
openSUSE Leap 16.0 Fixed
openSUSE Tumbleweed Fixed

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy