Skip to main content

Cisco Secure Workload CVE-2026-20231

| EUVDEUVD-2026-62561 CRITICAL
Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection') (CWE-74)
2026-08-19 cisco GHSA-ww3x-c34w-8v6x
9.9
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: cisco
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Obtain low-privileged Secure Workload account
  2. Delivery
    Reach network-accessible UI/API
  3. Exploit
    Submit input with unneutralized special elements
  4. Execution
    Injection executes in higher-privileged/cross-tenant context
  5. Persist
    Escalate across changed scope boundary
  6. Impact
    Full compromise of policy and workload data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A05:2025 - Injection
ASVS 5.0
V1 - Encoding and Sanitization Input neutralization, injection prevention
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires valid authenticated access to Cisco Secure Workload at a low privilege level (CVSS PR:L) - a legitimate but non-administrative tenant, operator, or API account - reachable over the network (AV:N) with low attack complexity and no user interaction. The limiting factor is that no anonymous/unauthenticated path is indicated by the vector: an attacker must first obtain low-privileged credentials or a valid session. The generic vendor description does not name the exact injectable feature, protocol, or configuration setting, so the specific vulnerable input surface is not confirmed from available data; the scope change (S:C) indicates the injected payload crosses into a component outside the attacker's authorized privilege or tenant boundary. Any Secure Workload release prior to the hardening fix is considered exposed.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score is 9.9 (Critical) with vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H: network-reachable, low complexity, requiring only low privileges and no user interaction, with a scope change and total CIA impact - a genuinely high-severity profile because an already-authenticated low-privileged user can pivot to full compromise. However, real-world urgency is tempered by several signals: the vulnerability was discovered internally by Cisco (not observed in attacks), there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, it is not in CISA KEV, and no EPSS score was supplied in the input. The requirement of valid low-privileged credentials (PR:L) meaningfully limits opportunistic mass exploitation compared to a PR:N flaw. The description is a generic hardening-advisory blurb and does not describe the specific injection mechanism, so the exact exploitation path is not confirmed from available data - the 9.9 rating and scope change should be treated as vendor-assessed rather than independently verified. Net: a real patching priority for organizations running Secure Workload due to the critical score and authenticated-but-low bar, but the absence of KEV/POC/EPSS signals suggests no evidence of active or imminent widespread exploitation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who holds or phishes a low-privileged Secure Workload tenant/operator account submits crafted input containing special elements into a field or API parameter that the platform fails to neutralize, causing the payload to be interpreted by a downstream component running in a higher-privileged or cross-tenant context. Leveraging the changed scope, the attacker escalates to full read/write control over segmentation policy and workload data beyond their authorized boundary. No public exploit is identified at time of analysis, and successful exploitation depends on possessing valid low-level credentials.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.4% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026

Privilege escalation and cross-tenant compromise in Cisco Secure Workload (formerly Tetration) arises from improper neutralization of special elements (CWE-74 injection class), allowing a low-privileged authenticated user to inject crafted input that breaks the application security boundary. Because the CVSS scope is changed (S:C) with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, an attacker with limited access can affect components beyond their authorized scope. The issue was found internally by Cisco during a hardening review and is addressed in a consolidated software hardening release; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and it is not listed in CISA KEV.

RemediationAI

Upgrade to the fixed software hardening release identified in Cisco Security Advisory cisco-sa-hardening-csw1-shSvndWP (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-hardening-csw1-shSvndWP); this is Patch available per vendor advisory, but the input does not provide a single exact fixed version number, so consult the advisory's fixed-release table for the specific target build corresponding to your current train. Because exploitation requires an authenticated low-privileged account, compensating controls until you can patch include tightening account provisioning and auditing existing Secure Workload user/role assignments, removing unnecessary low-privilege or tenant accounts, and restricting network access to the Secure Workload management/UI and API endpoints to trusted administrative networks or a jump host (trade-off: may disrupt legitimate integrations and remote operators). Increase monitoring of Secure Workload audit logs for anomalous API/UI input and privilege-boundary crossings. Do not rely on these controls as a substitute for the hardening release given the critical, scope-changing nature of the flaw.

Affected VersionsENISA

Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.1
Cisco Secure Workload 4.0.2.4
Cisco Secure Workload 2.2.1.39
Cisco Secure Workload 3.2.1.32
Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.40
Cisco Secure Workload 3.6.1.5
Cisco Secure Workload 3.2.1.31
Cisco Secure Workload 2.3.1.52
Cisco Secure Workload 3.8.1.53
Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.19
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.42
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.69
Cisco Secure Workload 3.7.1.39
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.28
Cisco Secure Workload 3.8.1.39
Cisco Secure Workload 3.6.1.35
Cisco Secure Workload 3.8.1.1
Cisco Secure Workload 3.5.1.23
Cisco Secure Workload 2.2.1.41
Cisco Secure Workload 3.7.1.22
Cisco Secure Workload 3.5.1.30
Cisco Secure Workload 3.1.1.54
Cisco Secure Workload 3.10.4.8
Cisco Secure Workload 3.2.1.20
Cisco Secure Workload 3.7.1.59
Cisco Secure Workload 3.5.1.2
Cisco Secure Workload 2.3.1.41
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.33
Cisco Secure Workload 3.1.1.67
Cisco Secure Workload 3.5.1.20
Cisco Secure Workload 3.1.1.55
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.23
Cisco Secure Workload 3.10.3.19
Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.35
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.5
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.10
Cisco Secure Workload 3.7.1.5
Cisco Secure Workload 3.5.1.31
Cisco Secure Workload 2.1.1.29
Cisco Secure Workload 1.102.21
Cisco Secure Workload 3.5.1.1
Cisco Secure Workload 3.7.1.51
Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.34
Cisco Secure Workload 3.10.8.3
Cisco Secure Workload 3.10.7.4
Cisco Secure Workload 3.6.1.21
Cisco Secure Workload 2.1.1.33
Cisco Secure Workload 3.6.1.36
Cisco Secure Workload 2.1.1.31
Cisco Secure Workload 3.8.1.19
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.24
Cisco Secure Workload 2.2.1.34
Cisco Secure Workload 3.1.1.59
Cisco Secure Workload 3.1.1.65
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.64
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.1
Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.14
Cisco Secure Workload 1.103.1.12
Cisco Secure Workload 3.2.1.18
Cisco Secure Workload 3.10.6.3
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.25
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.38
Cisco Secure Workload 3.10.5.6
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.50
Cisco Secure Workload 3.10.2.11
Cisco Secure Workload 3.2.1.19
Cisco Secure Workload 2.3.1.49
Cisco Secure Workload 4.0.2.5
Cisco Secure Workload 2.0.1.34
Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.28
Cisco Secure Workload 2.0.2.20
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.35
Cisco Secure Workload 3.10.1.1
Cisco Secure Workload 3.6.1.17
Cisco Secure Workload 4.0.1.1
Cisco Secure Workload 3.1.1.53
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.28
Cisco Secure Workload 4.0.3.17
Cisco Secure Workload 2.3.1.45
Cisco Secure Workload 2.3.1.51
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.16
Cisco Secure Workload 3.2.1.28
Cisco Secure Workload 2.3.1.50
Cisco Secure Workload 3.8.1.36
Cisco Secure Workload 2.3.1.53
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.2
Cisco Secure Workload 3.1.1.70
Cisco Secure Workload 4.0.3.13
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.52
Cisco Secure Workload 2.2.1.35
Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.20
Cisco Secure Workload 3.1.1.61
Cisco Secure Workload 3.2.1.33
Cisco Secure Workload 3.6.1.52
Cisco Secure Workload 3.9.1.66
Cisco Secure Workload 3.4.1.6
Cisco Secure Workload 3.5.1.17
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.53
Cisco Secure Workload 3.5.1.37
Cisco Secure Workload 3.3.2.12
Cisco Secure Workload 3.6.1.47

Affected Packages

euvd cisco_secure_workload no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Cisco Secure Workload is Cisco's data-center and cloud workload micro-segmentation and application-dependency-mapping platform (formerly branded Tetration), used to enforce zero-trust segmentation policy across servers and containers. The root cause is CWE-74, improper neutralization of special elements in output/commands, the parent class covering injection flaws (command, expression, SQL, or similar) where attacker-controlled data is passed into an interpreter or downstream component without proper escaping. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_secure_workload, spanning a very wide range of releases from the 1.x/2.x line through 3.x and 4.0.x. The changed scope (S:C) in the CVSS vector indicates the injection crosses a trust/authorization boundary - consistent with a multi-tenant appliance where injected input executes in a context more privileged than, or logically separate from, the attacker's own tenant or role.

Know when Cisco Secure Workload gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cisco) PRIMARY 9.9 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.9 CRITICAL

Network-reachable authenticated low-privilege user (PR:L) injects unneutralized input crossing a tenant/privilege boundary (S:C) yielding full CIA impact; low complexity, no user interaction.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H

Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).

CVSS VectorVendor: cisco

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

DescriptionCVE.org

As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco Secure Workload engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.   The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20231 are related to improper neutralization of special elements issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) CWE-74.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Cisco Secure Workload contains a critical privilege escalation vulnerability (CVE-2026-20231) requiring authenticated access that allows low-privileged users to inject crafted input and bypass security boundaries to access data across tenant boundaries. Organizations with multi-tenant Secure Workload deployments face immediate risk of unauthorized data access, modification, and service disruption affecting multiple business units or customers.

Business Impact: Severe
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: restrict low-privileged user permissions and require approval for elevated operations; implement comprehensive audit logging for authentication and cross-tenant access events; apply input validation and filtering for special characters at the application layer; segregate multi-tenant environments at the network layer; enable continuous monitoring for anomalous access patterns across tenant boundaries.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.4%
Top 65% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Enterprise micro-segmentation appliance, common in large data centers, not ubiquitous
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.4%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
Very High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

50
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +50
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy