Skip to main content

Cisco RoomOS CVE-2026-20156

| EUVDEUVD-2026-44717 CRITICAL
Buffer Overflow (CWE-119)
2026-07-15 cisco GHSA-gxwc-c8rv-5m26
9.8
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Reach RoomOS device over network
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted input to vulnerable service
  3. Exploit
    Trigger CWE-119 buffer overflow
  4. Execution
    Corrupt memory / execute code
  5. Impact
    Full compromise of collaboration endpoint

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Bounds checking, buffer size validation
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Per the CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N) the flaw is remotely reachable over the network with low complexity, no authentication, and no user interaction against affected RoomOS builds - no special product feature toggle is documented as a precondition. The key limiting factor is network exposure: the attacker must be able to reach the vulnerable RoomOS service, so devices confined to a segmented/management-only network or behind firewalls are substantially harder to hit than internet- or flat-network-exposed endpoints. Cisco does not identify which specific parsing service is affected, so the practical reachable attack surface depends on the device's enabled services and network placement; exploitation is further limited by the absence of any public exploit and CISA SSVC's assessment of Automatable=no.

Impact

The signals are deliberately mixed and should temper the raw 9.8. The CVSS vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N, C:H/I:H/A:H) describes a worst-case network-reachable, unauthenticated, total-impact flaw, which is why the base score is critical. However, the exploitation-oriented signals all point downward: EPSS is only 0.23% (14th percentile), there is no public exploit identified, the vulnerability is not in CISA KEV, and CISA's SSVC decision framework records Exploitation=none and Automatable=no while confirming Technical Impact=total. This combination is typical of a vendor-self-disclosed hardening bundle: theoretically severe but with no evidence of real-world attack activity and no released exploit tooling. A caveat worth verifying: Cisco describes these as internally discovered issues grouped under a pillar CWE with no exploitation detail, so the AV:N/AC:L assignment is Cisco's assertion rather than something independently reproducible from the disclosure - for many RoomOS memory bugs, network reach depends on which service parses attacker-controlled input and whether the device is exposed beyond a trusted management network. Net priority: because RoomOS endpoints often sit on corporate networks and the impact is total device compromise, organizations running the listed versions should patch on a normal-to-expedited cycle, but this does not carry the emergency, actively-exploited urgency of a KEV-listed flaw.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with network reach to a Cisco RoomOS endpoint sends specially crafted input to a vulnerable network-facing service, triggering a buffer overflow that corrupts memory and, given the reported total (C:H/I:H/A:H) impact, could allow arbitrary code execution or a device crash. Because the CVSS vector indicates no authentication and no user interaction are required, exploitation would not depend on tricking a user, though no public exploit code is currently available.

Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Why: CRITICAL severity.
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv2 – Aug 11, 2026

Memory-corruption vulnerabilities in Cisco RoomOS Software, disclosed by Cisco as a bundled hardening release from an internal security review, are scored CVSS 9.8 and could let remote unauthenticated attackers trigger buffer-overflow conditions on Cisco video collaboration endpoints. Per the CVSS vector the flaw is network-reachable with no authentication or user interaction and yields total impact to confidentiality, integrity, and availability. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis, EPSS is low (0.23%), and CISA SSVC records exploitation status as none, indicating no observed exploitation despite the critical score.

Earlier versions of this analysis (1)
v1 Jul 15, 2026 - 16:47 CVSS 8.1

Memory-corruption vulnerabilities in Cisco RoomOS Software (the operating system on Cisco/Webex collaboration room endpoints) allow remote, unauthenticated attackers to trigger buffer-boundary violations that can compromise device confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CVSS 8.1). The flaws were internally discovered by Cisco's RoomOS engineering team during a proactive security review and are grouped under the CWE-119 buffer-error pillar; there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the issue is not listed in CISA KEV. High attack complexity (AC:H) reduces the practical ease of exploitation despite the network-facing, no-privilege vector.

RemediationAI

Patch available per vendor advisory: upgrade RoomOS to the hardened/fixed build that Cisco publishes in security advisory cisco-sa-hardening-roomos-AqNMbEq (https://sec.cloudapps.cisco.com/security/center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/cisco-sa-hardening-roomos-AqNMbEq); the input data does not include a single exact fixed version string, so consult that advisory's fixed-release table for your specific train (10.x/11.x/26.x). RoomOS devices are typically cloud- or Control-Hub-managed, so the fastest remediation is to allow or trigger the automatic firmware update to the current hardened release. As compensating controls until updated, restrict network reachability of the endpoints: place video devices on a dedicated management VLAN and block inbound access to their management and signaling services from untrusted networks and the internet (the trade-off is that remote-worker or cross-site device management may require VPN/proxy adjustments), and disable any unused device services or web/API interfaces to shrink the attack surface (trade-off: reduced remote administration and integration functionality).

Affected VersionsENISA

Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.32.5.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.9.2.4
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.3.2.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.19.2.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.19 StepUpg
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.11.2.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.1.4.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.5.2.4
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 26.0.1.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.33.1.7
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.20.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.8.4.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.15.5.3
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.14.2.3
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.32.4.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.32.2.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.24.1.5
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.31.1.5
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.11.5.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.11.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.14.4.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 26.5.2.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.3.2.4
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 26.2.2.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.32.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.27.4.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.15.2.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.24.4.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.3.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.11.4.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.23.1.8
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.20.2.3
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.17.4.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 26.4.1.4
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.37.1.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.14.5.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.5.4.6
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.27.5.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.3.4.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.19.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.9.3.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.14.2.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.8.2.5
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.23.1.6
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.15.4.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.1.3.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.28.1.3
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.36.1.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.19.5.6
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 26.4.1.6
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.17.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.11.6.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.1.2.4
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.24.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 26.1.1.5
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.24.2.4
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.15.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.27.2.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.27.3.0
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.34.1.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 26.3.1.3
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.35.1.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.5.3.3
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.8.3.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 10.19.4.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.17.2.2
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.38.1.1
Cisco RoomOS Software RoomOS 11.14.3.0

Affected Packages

euvd cisco_roomos_software_roomos no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Cisco RoomOS is the embedded operating system running on Cisco (formerly Cisco/Tandberg and Webex) room-based video collaboration devices such as Room, Board, and Desk series endpoints. The issue is classified under CWE-119 (Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer), a pillar-level weakness class that encompasses classic buffer overflows and out-of-bounds reads/writes - here explicitly tagged as 'Buffer Overflow.' Because CWE-119 is a broad pillar rather than a specific child weakness (e.g., CWE-787 out-of-bounds write or CWE-125 out-of-bounds read), the exact memory-safety primitive is not disclosed. The single affected CPE, cpe:2.3:a:cisco:cisco_roomos_software, confirms the software (not a specific hardware SKU) is the vulnerable component, and Cisco states this CVE aggregates multiple internally discovered issues fixed together.

Know when Cisco Roomos Software gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (cisco) PRIMARY HIGH
NVD 9.8 CRITICAL
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
vuln.today AI 9.8 CRITICAL

Following Cisco's stated network-reachable, unauthenticated buffer overflow with total device impact; AV:N/PR:N/UI:N and C/I/A:H retained, though the vague pillar CWE lowers confidence in AC:L.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (cisco).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

Lifecycle Timeline

3
Severity Changed
Aug 11, 2026 - 14:52 NVD
HIGH CRITICAL
CVSS changed
Aug 11, 2026 - 14:52 NVD
8.1 (HIGH) 9.8 (CRITICAL)
CVE Published
Jul 15, 2026 - 16:17 cve.org
HIGH 8.1

DescriptionNVD

As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco RoomOS engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities.

The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20156 are related to improper restriction of operations within the bounds of a memory buffer that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-119.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

Cisco RoomOS video collaboration endpoints are vulnerable to critical remote attacks that could compromise endpoint operations and communications without authentication. With no patch currently available, organizations relying on these systems face immediate risk to the confidentiality and availability of their internal communications infrastructure.

Business Impact: High
Compensating Controls

Network segmentation and firewall rules limiting RoomOS endpoint access to trusted internal networks only; access control lists preventing external direct connections; continuous monitoring of Cisco security advisories for patch availability; endpoint logging and intrusion detection monitoring; periodic assessment of endpoint security configurations.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 86% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
Cisco enterprise video room endpoints, common in corporate settings but not universal
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity CRITICAL
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
CRITICAL severity
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact
High
Technical Impact
Total

Priority Score

49
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +49
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy