Skip to main content

IBM i CVE-2026-18102

| EUVDEUVD-2026-62853 MEDIUM
Heap-based Buffer Overflow (CWE-122)
2026-08-19 ibm GHSA-3x6j-qqg9-972j
4.3
CVSS 3.1 · NVD
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to IBM i with low-privilege credentials
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted input to vulnerable subsystem
  3. Exploit
    Integer underflow bypasses bounds check
  4. Execution
    Write past heap allocation boundary
  5. Impact
    Corrupt adjacent component memory region

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session with at least low-privilege access to the IBM i system (PR:L per CVSS vector), which explicitly rules out unauthenticated remote exploitation. High attack complexity (AC:H) imposes additional unspecified preconditions - likely specific input construction, heap state dependencies, or timing requirements - that must be met for the integer underflow to produce a usable out-of-bounds write. The vulnerability is confirmed across IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6; status on other releases is not confirmed. Factors limiting exploitation: mandatory authentication, high attack complexity requiring skilled exploitation, no confirmed public exploit, and impact limited to low integrity with no confidentiality or availability consequence.

Impact

The CVSS base score of 3.5 accurately represents a constrained real-world threat: network reachability (AV:N) is substantially offset by high attack complexity (AC:H) and a mandatory low-privilege authenticated session (PR:L). The scope change (S:C) is the most noteworthy signal - it suggests adjacent heap corruption could affect components beyond the directly vulnerable routine, which in IBM i's tightly integrated subsystem architecture could have cross-process implications that the I:L rating alone does not fully convey. However, the absence of a CISA KEV listing, the lack of any disclosed POC, and the missing EPSS score all point toward a theoretical rather than actively weaponized threat. The AC:H rating is a meaningful barrier: reliable exploitation of an integer underflow typically requires knowledge of the heap layout or specific triggering input patterns, making opportunistic mass exploitation unlikely. Even a well-resourced enterprise operations team running IBM i in a regulated vertical should treat this as a scheduled patch cycle item rather than an emergency response - the authentication gate and complexity requirement substantially narrow the realistic attacker pool. No conflicting signals exist between the CVSS vector and the vulnerability description; both are internally consistent.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker with a valid low-privilege IBM i account sends specially crafted input to the vulnerable bounds-checking routine over the network, triggering an integer underflow that bypasses the size guard and allows a write to adjacent heap memory. Successfully exploiting the high-complexity preconditions - likely requiring knowledge of heap layout or precise input construction - could allow corruption of adjacent data structures belonging to another IBM i subsystem component. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, making this scenario primarily a concern for targeted, skilled adversaries rather than opportunistic attackers.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026

Heap-based buffer overflow in IBM i 7.3 through 7.6 allows a remote, low-privileged authenticated attacker to overwrite adjacent memory regions by triggering an integer underflow in the bounds checking logic. The CVSS scope change (S:C) reflects that the overwrite can cross component boundaries, though direct impact is rated low integrity only with no confidentiality or availability consequence. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing are identified at time of analysis; a vendor patch is available.

RemediationAI

IBM has released a patch for this vulnerability, confirmed by the vendor advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283297. Administrators should obtain and apply the appropriate PTFs for their specific IBM i release (7.3, 7.4, 7.5, or 7.6) as documented in that advisory; exact PTF numbers are not independently available in the provided data and must be retrieved directly from IBM. If immediate patching is not operationally feasible, a practical compensating control is to restrict network access to the IBM i subsystem or interface that processes the affected input, limiting which authenticated accounts can reach the vulnerable function using IBM i's object-level authority and IP filtering capabilities. Tightening the authority profile of low-privilege accounts that interact with the affected service reduces the pool of principals capable of triggering the underflow. Note that restricting access may affect legitimate workflows depending on how broadly the affected interface is used in your environment.

Affected VersionsENISA

i 7.6
i 7.5
i 7.4
i 7.3

Affected Packages

euvd i no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

IBM i (formerly AS/400 and iSeries) is IBM's integrated operating system for Power Systems hardware, widely used in financial services, insurance, manufacturing, and government for mission-critical workloads. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow), with the root cause being an integer underflow during a bounds-checking operation - a condition where an arithmetic subtraction wraps around to a large positive integer, causing the check to pass incorrectly and allowing a write beyond the intended heap allocation boundary. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* scopes the flaw to the IBM i software layer across all subversions of 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6. The CVSS scope change metric (S:C) indicates the memory corruption can reach memory regions owned by a component other than the directly vulnerable one, which is consistent with how heap overflows can corrupt adjacent allocations belonging to separate subsystems in IBM i's multi-process environment.

Know when the next one hits your stack

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY LOW
NVD 4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 3.5 LOW

Network vector and low-privilege authentication confirmed by description; AC:H reflects complex underflow triggering conditions; S:C reflects cross-component heap adjacency effect; no confidentiality or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorNVD

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Severity Changed
Aug 24, 2026 - 19:37 NVD
LOW MEDIUM
CVSS changed
Aug 24, 2026 - 19:37 NVD
3.5 (LOW) 4.3 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionNVD

IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to overwrite adjacent memory due to an integer underflow during bounds checking.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 87% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
specialized OS requiring IBM Power Systems hardware, niche enterprise installed base
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.

A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy