Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate to IBM i with low-privilege credentials
-
DeliverySend crafted input to vulnerable subsystem
-
ExploitInteger underflow bypasses bounds check
-
ExecutionWrite past heap allocation boundary
-
ImpactCorrupt adjacent component memory region
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Heap buffer bounds checking
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session with at least low-privilege access to the IBM i system (PR:L per CVSS vector), which explicitly rules out unauthenticated remote exploitation. High attack complexity (AC:H) imposes additional unspecified preconditions - likely specific input construction, heap state dependencies, or timing requirements - that must be met for the integer underflow to produce a usable out-of-bounds write. The vulnerability is confirmed across IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6; status on other releases is not confirmed. Factors limiting exploitation: mandatory authentication, high attack complexity requiring skilled exploitation, no confirmed public exploit, and impact limited to low integrity with no confidentiality or availability consequence. |
| Impact | The CVSS base score of 3.5 accurately represents a constrained real-world threat: network reachability (AV:N) is substantially offset by high attack complexity (AC:H) and a mandatory low-privilege authenticated session (PR:L). The scope change (S:C) is the most noteworthy signal - it suggests adjacent heap corruption could affect components beyond the directly vulnerable routine, which in IBM i's tightly integrated subsystem architecture could have cross-process implications that the I:L rating alone does not fully convey. However, the absence of a CISA KEV listing, the lack of any disclosed POC, and the missing EPSS score all point toward a theoretical rather than actively weaponized threat. The AC:H rating is a meaningful barrier: reliable exploitation of an integer underflow typically requires knowledge of the heap layout or specific triggering input patterns, making opportunistic mass exploitation unlikely. Even a well-resourced enterprise operations team running IBM i in a regulated vertical should treat this as a scheduled patch cycle item rather than an emergency response - the authentication gate and complexity requirement substantially narrow the realistic attacker pool. No conflicting signals exist between the CVSS vector and the vulnerability description; both are internally consistent. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with a valid low-privilege IBM i account sends specially crafted input to the vulnerable bounds-checking routine over the network, triggering an integer underflow that bypasses the size guard and allows a write to adjacent heap memory. Successfully exploiting the high-complexity preconditions - likely requiring knowledge of heap layout or precise input construction - could allow corruption of adjacent data structures belonging to another IBM i subsystem component. No public exploit code exists at time of analysis, making this scenario primarily a concern for targeted, skilled adversaries rather than opportunistic attackers. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Aug 19, 2026
Heap-based buffer overflow in IBM i 7.3 through 7.6 allows a remote, low-privileged authenticated attacker to overwrite adjacent memory regions by triggering an integer underflow in the bounds checking logic. The CVSS scope change (S:C) reflects that the overwrite can cross component boundaries, though direct impact is rated low integrity only with no confidentiality or availability consequence. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing are identified at time of analysis; a vendor patch is available.
RemediationAI
IBM has released a patch for this vulnerability, confirmed by the vendor advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7283297. Administrators should obtain and apply the appropriate PTFs for their specific IBM i release (7.3, 7.4, 7.5, or 7.6) as documented in that advisory; exact PTF numbers are not independently available in the provided data and must be retrieved directly from IBM. If immediate patching is not operationally feasible, a practical compensating control is to restrict network access to the IBM i subsystem or interface that processes the affected input, limiting which authenticated accounts can reach the vulnerable function using IBM i's object-level authority and IP filtering capabilities. Tightening the authority profile of low-privilege accounts that interact with the affected service reduces the pool of principals capable of triggering the underflow. Note that restricting access may affect legitimate workflows depending on how broadly the affected interface is used in your environment.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
IBM i (formerly AS/400 and iSeries) is IBM's integrated operating system for Power Systems hardware, widely used in financial services, insurance, manufacturing, and government for mission-critical workloads. The vulnerability is classified under CWE-122 (Heap-based Buffer Overflow), with the root cause being an integer underflow during a bounds-checking operation - a condition where an arithmetic subtraction wraps around to a large positive integer, causing the check to pass incorrectly and allowing a write beyond the intended heap allocation boundary. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:ibm:i:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* scopes the flaw to the IBM i software layer across all subversions of 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6. The CVSS scope change metric (S:C) indicates the memory corruption can reach memory regions owned by a component other than the directly vulnerable one, which is consistent with how heap overflows can corrupt adjacent allocations belonging to separate subsystems in IBM i's multi-process environment.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Network vector and low-privilege authentication confirmed by description; AC:H reflects complex underflow triggering conditions; S:C reflects cross-component heap adjacency effect; no confidentiality or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
IBM i 7.6, 7.5, 7.4, and 7.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to overwrite adjacent memory due to an integer underflow during bounds checking.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
A heap overflow occurs when a program writes data beyond the bounds of a buffer allocated in the heap memory region.
EUVD-2026-62853
GHSA-3x6j-qqg9-972j
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB