Skip to main content

Sipeed PicoClaw CVE-2026-15319

| EUVDEUVD-2026-42775 MEDIUM
Improper Access Control (CWE-284)
2026-07-10 VulDB GHSA-f9rq-5867-x4mq
5.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulDB
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify exposed PicoClaw web interface
  2. Delivery
    Send crafted HTTP request with spoofed/malformed source IP
  3. Exploit
    Bypass IPAllowlist middleware check
  4. Execution
    Access restricted Launcher endpoints
  5. Impact
    Read or modify Launcher configuration

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Access control enforcement
MITRE ATT&CK

1 technique across 1 tactic: Defense Evasion

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

The PicoClaw web backend Launcher interface must be network-accessible (i.e., listening on a network interface reachable by the attacker). The IPAllowlist feature must be in use as the primary access control mechanism - environments that do not rely on application-layer IP filtering, or that enforce allowlisting at the firewall/load-balancer level, have a reduced but not eliminated attack surface. No authentication credentials, user interaction, or special privileges are required (PR:N, UI:N per CVSS 4.0). Exploitation is limited to versions up to 0.2.9; deployments behind a properly enforced network-level IP allowlist independent of the application are protected from remote exploitation. No platform-specific OS dependency has been identified.

Impact

The CVSS 4.0 base score of 6.9 with VC:L/VI:L/VA:L reflects limited but real impact: an attacker gains unauthorized access to web-accessible endpoints that would otherwise be restricted by the IP allowlist. The PR:N and AC:L metrics indicate straightforward unauthenticated remote exploitation with low complexity, which combined with the confirmed public exploit (E:P supplemental metric) meaningfully elevates practical risk above what the moderate base score alone suggests. CISA KEV status is not confirmed, meaning active mass exploitation has not been formally observed, but the availability of a public POC lowers the barrier for opportunistic attackers. The product's niche deployment footprint limits aggregate exposure, but any organization running PicoClaw's web interface on a network-accessible interface should treat this as a genuine priority rather than a theoretical risk, particularly since the middleware is explicitly designed as an access gate.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote unauthenticated attacker sends crafted HTTP requests to the PicoClaw Launcher web interface from an IP address that should be blocked by the configured allowlist. By exploiting the logic flaw in the IPAllowlist middleware function - potentially through header injection or IP representation manipulation - the attacker bypasses the access restriction and reaches protected backend endpoints, gaining unauthorized read and write access to Launcher functionality. A public proof-of-concept demonstrating this bypass is available at the GitHub issue tracker.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 10, 2026

Improper access control in Sipeed PicoClaw up to version 0.2.9 allows remote unauthenticated attackers to bypass the IP allowlist enforced by the Launcher's web backend middleware. The flaw resides in the IPAllowlist function within web/backend/middleware/access_control.go, which fails to correctly enforce source-address restrictions, permitting unauthorized network access to protected endpoints. A public proof-of-concept exploit exists (GitHub issue #3069), and an upstream patch (PR #3126) has been submitted but a formally released patched version has not been independently confirmed.

RemediationAI

Apply the upstream fix from GitHub pull request #3126 (https://github.com/sipeed/picoclaw/pull/3126) once it is merged and a tagged release is published; a formally released patched version number has not been independently confirmed at time of analysis. Until an official patch is available, the primary compensating control is to restrict network access to the PicoClaw web interface at the infrastructure level - place the service behind a firewall or reverse proxy that enforces IP allowlisting independently of the application layer, removing reliance on the flawed IPAllowlist middleware. Disabling the web interface entirely eliminates the attack surface if the Launcher UI is not operationally required. Monitoring HTTP access logs for unexpected source IPs reaching normally restricted endpoints can serve as a detection mechanism. Operators should track the pull request at https://vuldb.com/vuln/377259 for patch release confirmation.

Affected VersionsENISA

PicoClaw 0.2.8
PicoClaw 0.2.7
PicoClaw 0.2.5
PicoClaw 0.2.2
PicoClaw 0.2.9
PicoClaw 0.2.1
PicoClaw 0.2.0
PicoClaw 0.2.3
PicoClaw 0.2.6
PicoClaw 0.2.4

Affected Packages

euvd picoclaw no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

PicoClaw is a web-enabled launcher product by Sipeed (CPE: cpe:2.3:a:sipeed:picoclaw:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*), implemented in Go. The affected component is the access control middleware in web/backend/middleware/access_control.go, specifically the IPAllowlist function, which is responsible for restricting inbound HTTP requests to a configured set of allowed source IP addresses. CWE-284 (Improper Access Control) indicates the allowlist enforcement logic can be circumvented - likely through header manipulation (e.g., X-Forwarded-For spoofing), malformed IP representations, or a logic error in the comparison routine - rather than a memory-safety issue. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) confirms exploitation requires no special network position, no elevated privileges, and no target interaction.

Know when Picoclaw gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulDB) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 7.3 HIGH

Network-accessible IP allowlist bypass with no privileges or interaction required; impact limited to low C/I/A with no scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (VulDB).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulDB

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
Low
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
Low
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

1
CVSS changed
Jul 10, 2026 - 03:22 NVD
6.9 (MEDIUM) 5.5 (MEDIUM)

DescriptionCVE.org

A security vulnerability has been detected in Sipeed PicoClaw up to 0.2.9. This affects the function IPAllowlist of the file web/backend/middleware/access_control.go of the component Launcher. Such manipulation leads to improper access controls. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The name of the patch is 3126. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 76% exploitable
Prevalence
Rare
niche Sipeed hardware project, minimal enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Social Media
1
Sightings
Data Quality
7 sources
Confidence: High
EUVD NVD CVE.org EPSS Vulnrichment CIRCL GitHub VulDB

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

48
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Related Vulnerabilities in Sipeed PicoClaw Access Control Vulnerabilities

View all 4

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy