Skip to main content

GStreamer webrtcbin CVE-2026-14935

| EUVDEUVD-2026-42051 LOW
Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation (CWE-670)
2026-07-07 redhat GHSA-m678-vwg3-59mp
3.7
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: redhat
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Recon
    Attain MitM on WebRTC signaling channel
  2. Delivery
    Intercept outgoing SDP offer or answer
  3. Exploit
    Strip a=fingerprint attribute from SDP
  4. Install
    Forward modified SDP to target endpoint
  5. C2
    Inverted _check_sdp_crypto() accepts fingerprint-free SDP
  6. Execute
    Present attacker-controlled DTLS certificate
  7. Impact
    Decrypt or tamper with media stream

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Always-incorrect control flow
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires the attacker to hold an active man-in-the-middle position on the WebRTC signaling channel - specifically, the ability to intercept and modify SDP offer/answer messages in transit. This is the single mandatory precondition stated in the description. The CVSS vector PR:N confirms no authentication to the target system is required once signaling access is obtained. The flaw is present in webrtcbin regardless of whether the application enforces DTLS-SRTP, because the bypass occurs before DTLS negotiation at the SDP validation layer. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the attacker must control or intercept the signaling path, not merely be on the same network; (2) AC:H reflects that this MitM position is not trivially achieved over encrypted signaling transports (WSS/TLS); (3) the scope is restricted to active WebRTC sessions using GStreamer webrtcbin - passive or non-WebRTC deployments are unaffected.

Impact

The NVD CVSS 3.1 score of 3.7 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) accurately reflects the constrained real-world risk. The AC:H metric is the dominant limiting factor: exploiting this flaw requires the attacker to already hold a man-in-the-middle position on the WebRTC signaling channel - a non-trivial prerequisite that significantly narrows the attack surface. The direct integrity impact is scored Low (I:L) because the vulnerability weakens a defense-in-depth control rather than directly leaking or corrupting data; however, a successful exploit could escalate to full media stream interception, which the CVSS base score does not capture. No EPSS data was included in the provided intelligence; KEV status is negative; no POC code has been identified at time of analysis. In practice, this is a meaningful security regression in WebRTC-dependent applications (VoIP, video conferencing) running on RHEL, but the MitM signaling prerequisite prevents mass automated exploitation. Organizations operating GStreamer-based WebRTC endpoints on untrusted networks or over unencrypted signaling transports face higher effective risk than the raw score suggests.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker positioned between a GStreamer-based WebRTC endpoint and its signaling server - for example, via ARP poisoning on a local network or by controlling a compromised signaling relay - intercepts outgoing SDP offers and strips the a=fingerprint attribute before forwarding them. Because _check_sdp_crypto() has its conditional inverted, the receiving endpoint's GStreamer instance accepts the fingerprint-free SDP as valid. The attacker can now present their own DTLS certificate during media negotiation without detection, enabling decryption and replay of the media stream. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified.

Monitor Track and reassess. Why: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9).
No patch listed yet 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 07, 2026

GStreamer's webrtcbin component accepts remote SDP offers and answers that are missing the required a=fingerprint attribute due to an inverted boolean logic check in _check_sdp_crypto(), undermining the DTLS certificate fingerprint binding that protects WebRTC media streams from interception. An attacker already positioned as a man-in-the-middle on the WebRTC signaling channel can strip the a=fingerprint attribute from SDP messages, which the vulnerable code then incorrectly accepts, allowing the attacker to substitute their own DTLS certificate and intercept or tamper with encrypted media. No public exploit code exists and no CISA KEV listing has been issued; however, the flaw is architecturally significant because it silently voids a key WebRTC security guarantee rather than causing an obvious crash.

RemediationAI

An upstream fix has been submitted via GStreamer's security merge request at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer-security/-/merge_requests/98; however, a specific tagged release version incorporating this fix was not confirmed in the available data, so this should be characterized as an upstream fix available (MR/commit) with released patched version not independently confirmed. RHEL users should monitor https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14935 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2497679 for updated RPM packages and apply vendor-released patches as soon as they are available. As a compensating control prior to patching, organizations should enforce TLS/HTTPS or another authenticated transport for WebRTC signaling (e.g., WSS WebSocket) to eliminate the MitM prerequisite that this flaw requires - this does not fix the bug but removes the attacker's ability to intercept and modify SDP messages. Applications that cannot be patched immediately should additionally consider enabling application-layer certificate pinning at the media layer if their WebRTC stack supports it, though this adds operational complexity for certificate rotation.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

WebRTC sessions negotiate cryptographic parameters through the Session Description Protocol (SDP), where the a=fingerprint attribute cryptographically binds the DTLS certificate used to encrypt media to the signaling exchange. Without this binding, an adversary who controls the signaling path can substitute a different certificate undetected. GStreamer is an open-source multimedia pipeline framework; its webrtcbin plugin provides WebRTC functionality on Linux and other platforms, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10 (CPE cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_*). The root cause is CWE-670 (Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation): the _check_sdp_crypto() function uses an inverted conditional, meaning the presence of a=fingerprint causes rejection while its absence causes acceptance - the exact opposite of the intended security check. This is a pure logic error, not a memory-safety issue.

Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (redhat) PRIMARY 3.7 LOW
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 3.7 LOW

Network vector requires MitM on signaling (AC:H); no auth needed; only integrity weakened, no confidentiality or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).

CVSS VectorVendor: redhat

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
High
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A logic vulnerability was found in GStreamer's webrtcbin component. The _check_sdp_crypto() function contains an inverted boolean condition that causes it to accept remote SDP offers or answers that lack the required a=fingerprint attribute, while incorrectly rejecting those that include it. An attacker with the ability to intercept and modify WebRTC signaling messages could exploit this to bypass the SDP-level DTLS certificate fingerprint binding, weakening defenses against man-in-the-middle attacks on media streams.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
GStreamer ships widely in Linux distros but WebRTC-specific usage is narrower
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity LOW
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Defer
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Low
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

18
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +18
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_10:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_6:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_7:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_8:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_9:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2026-18663 MEDIUM
5.9 Aug 12

Heap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash

CVE-2026-4631 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 07

Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h

CVE-2026-4480 CRITICAL POC
9.0 May 26

Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft

CVE-2026-101258 HIGH POC
7.8 Oct 06

Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript

CVE-2026-96889 HIGH POC
7.8 Sep 23

Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity

CVE-2026-4775 HIGH POC
7.8 Mar 24

A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to

CVE-2026-114406 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Oct 21

The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe

CVE-2026-18922 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo

CVE-2026-14544 CRITICAL
9.8 Jul 03

Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter

CVE-2026-76578 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 07

Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a

CVE-2026-102560 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 29

A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes

CVE-2026-5121 HIGH
7.5 Mar 30

Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy