Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
ReconAttain MitM on WebRTC signaling channel
-
DeliveryIntercept outgoing SDP offer or answer
-
ExploitStrip a=fingerprint attribute from SDP
-
InstallForward modified SDP to target endpoint
-
C2Inverted _check_sdp_crypto() accepts fingerprint-free SDP
-
ExecutePresent attacker-controlled DTLS certificate
-
ImpactDecrypt or tamper with media stream
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Always-incorrect control flow
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires the attacker to hold an active man-in-the-middle position on the WebRTC signaling channel - specifically, the ability to intercept and modify SDP offer/answer messages in transit. This is the single mandatory precondition stated in the description. The CVSS vector PR:N confirms no authentication to the target system is required once signaling access is obtained. The flaw is present in webrtcbin regardless of whether the application enforces DTLS-SRTP, because the bypass occurs before DTLS negotiation at the SDP validation layer. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the attacker must control or intercept the signaling path, not merely be on the same network; (2) AC:H reflects that this MitM position is not trivially achieved over encrypted signaling transports (WSS/TLS); (3) the scope is restricted to active WebRTC sessions using GStreamer webrtcbin - passive or non-WebRTC deployments are unaffected. |
| Impact | The NVD CVSS 3.1 score of 3.7 (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N) accurately reflects the constrained real-world risk. The AC:H metric is the dominant limiting factor: exploiting this flaw requires the attacker to already hold a man-in-the-middle position on the WebRTC signaling channel - a non-trivial prerequisite that significantly narrows the attack surface. The direct integrity impact is scored Low (I:L) because the vulnerability weakens a defense-in-depth control rather than directly leaking or corrupting data; however, a successful exploit could escalate to full media stream interception, which the CVSS base score does not capture. No EPSS data was included in the provided intelligence; KEV status is negative; no POC code has been identified at time of analysis. In practice, this is a meaningful security regression in WebRTC-dependent applications (VoIP, video conferencing) running on RHEL, but the MitM signaling prerequisite prevents mass automated exploitation. Organizations operating GStreamer-based WebRTC endpoints on untrusted networks or over unencrypted signaling transports face higher effective risk than the raw score suggests. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker positioned between a GStreamer-based WebRTC endpoint and its signaling server - for example, via ARP poisoning on a local network or by controlling a compromised signaling relay - intercepts outgoing SDP offers and strips the a=fingerprint attribute before forwarding them. Because _check_sdp_crypto() has its conditional inverted, the receiving endpoint's GStreamer instance accepts the fingerprint-free SDP as valid. The attacker can now present their own DTLS certificate during media negotiation without detection, enabling decryption and replay of the media stream. No public proof-of-concept code has been identified. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 07, 2026
GStreamer's webrtcbin component accepts remote SDP offers and answers that are missing the required a=fingerprint attribute due to an inverted boolean logic check in _check_sdp_crypto(), undermining the DTLS certificate fingerprint binding that protects WebRTC media streams from interception. An attacker already positioned as a man-in-the-middle on the WebRTC signaling channel can strip the a=fingerprint attribute from SDP messages, which the vulnerable code then incorrectly accepts, allowing the attacker to substitute their own DTLS certificate and intercept or tamper with encrypted media. No public exploit code exists and no CISA KEV listing has been issued; however, the flaw is architecturally significant because it silently voids a key WebRTC security guarantee rather than causing an obvious crash.
RemediationAI
An upstream fix has been submitted via GStreamer's security merge request at https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/gstreamer/gstreamer-security/-/merge_requests/98; however, a specific tagged release version incorporating this fix was not confirmed in the available data, so this should be characterized as an upstream fix available (MR/commit) with released patched version not independently confirmed. RHEL users should monitor https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/CVE-2026-14935 and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2497679 for updated RPM packages and apply vendor-released patches as soon as they are available. As a compensating control prior to patching, organizations should enforce TLS/HTTPS or another authenticated transport for WebRTC signaling (e.g., WSS WebSocket) to eliminate the MitM prerequisite that this flaw requires - this does not fix the bug but removes the attacker's ability to intercept and modify SDP messages. Applications that cannot be patched immediately should additionally consider enabling application-layer certificate pinning at the media layer if their WebRTC stack supports it, though this adds operational complexity for certificate rotation.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
WebRTC sessions negotiate cryptographic parameters through the Session Description Protocol (SDP), where the a=fingerprint attribute cryptographically binds the DTLS certificate used to encrypt media to the signaling exchange. Without this binding, an adversary who controls the signaling path can substitute a different certificate undetected. GStreamer is an open-source multimedia pipeline framework; its webrtcbin plugin provides WebRTC functionality on Linux and other platforms, including Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 through 10 (CPE cpe:2.3:a:red_hat:red_hat_enterprise_linux_*). The root cause is CWE-670 (Always-Incorrect Control Flow Implementation): the _check_sdp_crypto() function uses an inverted conditional, meaning the presence of a=fingerprint causes rejection while its absence causes acceptance - the exact opposite of the intended security check. This is a pure logic error, not a memory-safety issue.
Know when Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Network vector requires MitM on signaling (AC:H); no auth needed; only integrity weakened, no confidentiality or availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (redhat).
CVSS VectorVendor: redhat
DescriptionCVE.org
A logic vulnerability was found in GStreamer's webrtcbin component. The _check_sdp_crypto() function contains an inverted boolean condition that causes it to accept remote SDP offers or answers that lack the required a=fingerprint attribute, while incorrectly rejecting those that include it. An attacker with the ability to intercept and modify WebRTC signaling messages could exploit this to bypass the SDP-level DTLS certificate fingerprint binding, weakening defenses against man-in-the-middle attacks on media streams.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Authentication bypass attacks exploit flaws in the verification mechanisms that control access to systems and applications.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
More in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 10
View allHeap corruption via double-free in 389-ds-base's LDAP control parsing allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash
Remote code execution in Cockpit's web interface allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the h
Remote code execution in Samba's printing subsystem allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary shell commands via craft
Ghostscript can execute arbitrary shell commands with the privileges of its process when it renders a crafted PostScript
Use-after-free in librsvg during rendering of crafted SVG documents with nested XInclude directives and duplicate entity
A signed integer overflow vulnerability exists in the libtiff library's putcontig8bitYCbCr44tile function that leads to
The system CA trust store shipped in Red Hat's ca-certificates RPM packages includes eMudhra root authorities that signe
Authentication bypass in 389 Directory Server (shipped as Red Hat Directory Server 11-13 and within RHEL 6-10) lets remo
Remote code execution and privilege escalation in HPLIP (HP Linux Imaging and Printing) affects the hpcups print filter
Unauthenticated privilege escalation in FreeIPA (Red Hat Identity Management) allows a remote attacker to gain genuine a
A heap buffer overflow exists in libsoup's WebSocket permessage-deflate compression path: when a very large outbound mes
Remote code execution in libarchive on 32-bit systems allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via spe
EUVD-2026-42051
GHSA-m678-vwg3-59mp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB