Skip to main content

IBM Langflow OSS CVE-2026-12767

| EUVDEUVD-2026-78083 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-09-14 ibm GHSA-jvmc-mxmx-5qwq
6.5
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Identify internet-exposed Langflow OSS instance
  2. Delivery
    Send unauthenticated HTTP request with crafted internal URL
  3. Exploit
    Server issues SSRF request to internal target
  4. Execution
    Read response to enumerate internal services or cloud metadata
  5. Impact
    Use obtained credentials or topology data to pivot laterally

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

No authentication is required - the CVSS vector PR:N/UI:N confirms unauthenticated exploitation is possible against any network-reachable Langflow OSS instance in the affected version range. No special configuration setting needs to be enabled; the SSRF vector is inherent to the application's core HTTP-fetching functionality. Exploitation is limited by: (1) the Langflow server must be network-accessible to the attacker (internet-facing instances are most exposed); (2) the value of exploitation scales with the Langflow server's internal network access - instances with no privileged intranet reach or metadata API access yield only basic enumeration; (3) cloud metadata credential theft via SSRF requires IMDSv1 to be enabled on the host (IMDSv2-only environments mitigate this specific escalation path).

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 6.5 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N) reflects a realistic but moderate threat: the attack is trivially reachable without authentication or user interaction, but direct impact is bounded to limited confidentiality and integrity effects on the vulnerable system itself. SSRF in this context is most dangerous when the Langflow server has privileged network access - for example, when deployed in cloud environments where cloud metadata APIs (e.g., AWS IMDSv1 at 169.254.169.254) are accessible, or where internal microservices lack authentication because they assume perimeter trust. There is no KEV listing and no known POC, suggesting exploitation has not been observed in the wild. EPSS data is not available in the provided intelligence. The S:U scope metric may understate risk in cloud-native deployments where SSRF can pivot to credential theft via metadata endpoints, a scenario not reflected in the base score. Overall, this is a real-but-moderate priority: critical for internet-exposed Langflow instances in cloud environments, lower priority for air-gapped or internally-only deployed instances.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An unauthenticated attacker sends a crafted HTTP request to a publicly exposed Langflow OSS endpoint, supplying a URL pointing to an internal resource such as http://192.168.1.1/admin or http://169.254.169.254/latest/meta-data/. The Langflow server fetches the target URL and returns the response to the attacker, exposing internal service banners, configuration data, or cloud IAM credentials. No prior account or interaction with any user is required.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Sep 15, 2026

Server-side request forgery in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 permits unauthenticated remote attackers to cause the application server to issue arbitrary outbound HTTP requests. The primary risk is internal network enumeration - mapping services, ports, and hosts reachable from the Langflow deployment that are otherwise inaccessible to the external attacker - and potential use as a pivot to reach internal APIs or cloud metadata endpoints. No public exploit code exists and the CVE is not in the CISA KEV catalog; IBM has issued a patch via its support portal.

RemediationAI

Apply the vendor-released patch referenced in IBM's support advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7286665; the exact fixed version number is not independently confirmed in the available intelligence and should be verified directly from the advisory. If immediate patching is not possible, restrict outbound HTTP access from the Langflow server to an explicit allowlist of required external endpoints using egress firewall rules or an outbound proxy with URL filtering - this directly constrains what an SSRF attacker can reach and is the most effective compensating control. Additionally, if the Langflow instance does not need to be publicly accessible, place it behind authentication (reverse proxy with auth) or restrict network access to trusted clients only; this raises the effective attack complexity despite the PR:N CVSS rating. In cloud deployments, enforce IMDSv2 (requiring session-oriented requests) on EC2 and equivalent controls on other cloud platforms to prevent metadata credential theft via SSRF.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.11.5

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Langflow OSS is IBM's open-source low-code platform for building AI agent workflows, allowing users to compose LLM chains and integrations through a graphical interface. The SSRF root cause (CWE-918: Server-Side Request Forgery) arises when user-supplied URLs or endpoint identifiers are passed to server-side HTTP clients without adequate validation or allowlist enforcement, causing the application to act as a proxy for the attacker. In AI workflow builders, SSRF is a particularly relevant risk because the core product function - fetching external APIs, models, and data sources - creates many legitimate outbound HTTP paths that are difficult to distinguish from malicious ones. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covering versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5.

Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 6.5 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Unauthenticated network attack with no complexity; limited confidentiality and integrity impact consistent with SSRF-only enumeration without confirmed scope change.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an unauthenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 88% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
growing open-source AI workflow builder, increasing enterprise AI/ML adoption
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

32
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +32
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2026-9198 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac

CVE-2026-19295 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 28

Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr

CVE-2026-7873 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 30

Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-

CVE-2026-93674 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 07

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi

CVE-2026-18729 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 28

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l

CVE-2026-93680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 29

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass security restrictions through im

CVE-2026-10561 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 22

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom

CVE-2026-12940 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 30

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary

CVE-2026-9103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l

CVE-2026-81204 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run

CVE-2026-79724 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper

CVE-2026-7646 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Aug 05

Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy