Skip to main content

Niagara Framework CVE-2026-11804

| EUVDEUVD-2026-48289 MEDIUM
Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges (CWE-280)
2026-07-23 Honeywell GHSA-769r-j4hr-6567
5.2
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: Honeywell
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain adjacent network position on OT/BAS segment
  2. Delivery
    Authenticate to Niagara with high-privileged credentials
  3. Exploit
    Trigger improper permission boundary in Framework
  4. Execution
    Access confidential data beyond authorized role scope
  5. Impact
    Exfiltrate configuration or operational data

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A10:2025 - Mishandling of Exceptional Conditions
ASVS 5.0
V8 - Authorization Insufficient permission handling
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires two simultaneous conditions: (1) the attacker must be positioned on the same network segment, subnet, or logical broadcast domain as the Niagara Framework or Enterprise Security system (AV:A - not exploitable remotely over the internet by default); and (2) the attacker must hold high-privileged authenticated credentials on the Niagara platform (PR:H). Exploitation is not possible by unauthenticated or low-privileged users. No specific non-default configuration is cited as a prerequisite - the flaw appears to be present in the default permission model of vulnerable versions. The QNX platform support is notable in embedded/controller deployments where network segmentation may be less rigorous. These two preconditions collectively limit the realistic attacker population to insiders, compromised admin accounts, or attackers who have already achieved significant lateral movement within the OT environment.

Impact

The CVSS 3.1 base score of 5.2 (Medium) reflects genuine mitigating constraints: AV:A restricts exploitation to adjacent-network attackers, and PR:H requires the attacker to already possess high-privileged credentials on the Niagara system - a significant barrier in most operational deployments. The C:H (High confidentiality) impact is the most consequential signal, as exposure of Niagara configuration, credentials, or operational data in ICS/BAS environments carries significant downstream risk even without direct system compromise. I:L (Low integrity) suggests limited unauthorized write capability. No EPSS score was provided, no POC has been identified, and the vulnerability is not in the CISA KEV catalog. The real-world priority is moderate for organizations running unpatched Niagara deployments in environments where internal threat actors or compromised privileged accounts are a plausible concern. For externally isolated OT networks with strict credential hygiene, exploitation likelihood is low. For environments where Niagara systems share network segments with broader enterprise infrastructure, the adjacent vector is less constraining and warrants faster remediation.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who has obtained high-privileged credentials to a Niagara Framework instance - whether through credential theft, insider access, or lateral movement within an OT network segment - connects to the Niagara system over the adjacent network and exploits the improper permission boundary enforcement to read sensitive system configuration, user credentials, or operational data beyond what their role should permit. No public POC is available, but the low attack complexity (AC:L) means exploitation requires no special expertise once adjacent network access and credentials are in hand.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.1% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 23, 2026

Privilege abuse in Tridium Niagara Framework and Niagara Enterprise Security allows an authenticated high-privileged user on an adjacent network to improperly access confidential data and perform limited unauthorized modifications beyond their sanctioned scope. Affected platforms span Windows, Linux, and QNX, and versions prior to 4.14.6 and 4.15.5 are vulnerable. No public exploit code has been identified and this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog at time of analysis.

RemediationAI

Upgrade Niagara Framework and Niagara Enterprise Security to version 4.14.6 or 4.15.5 (or later in their respective branches) as confirmed in the CVE description. Vendor guidance is available at https://www.tridium.com/us/en/product-security and https://www.honeywell.com/us/en/product-security. Where immediate patching is not feasible, apply network segmentation to ensure Niagara controllers and servers are isolated on dedicated OT VLANs inaccessible from broader enterprise or guest networks, which directly mitigates the AV:A attack vector. Additionally, audit and reduce the number of accounts with high-privileged access to Niagara, enforce multi-factor authentication where supported, and monitor for anomalous data access patterns by privileged accounts. These compensating controls reduce but do not eliminate risk - patch deployment remains the authoritative fix.

Affected VersionsENISA

Niagara Enterprise Security 0 <4.14.6
Niagara Framework 0 <4.15.5
Niagara Framework 0 <4.14.6
Niagara Enterprise Security 0 <4.15.5

Affected Packages

euvd niagara_enterprise_security fix: 4.14.6, 4.15.5
euvd niagara_framework fix: 4.14.6, 4.15.5

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 2 packages in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Tridium Niagara is a Java-based industrial IoT and building automation framework widely used in HVAC, lighting, energy management, and physical security systems. CWE-280 (Improper Handling of Insufficient Permissions or Privileges) indicates the framework fails to properly enforce permission boundaries when a user with high-level credentials attempts operations, allowing that role to exceed its authorized access. The affected CPE strings - cpe:2.3:a:tridium:niagara_framework and cpe:2.3:a:tridium:niagara_enterprise_security - confirm both the core operational framework and its enterprise security management layer are affected. The adjacent network attack vector (AV:A) implies exploitation requires the attacker to be on the same network segment, subnet, or logical broadcast domain as the Niagara controller or server, which is consistent with typical OT/BAS network topologies. The 'Microsoft' tag in the source intelligence may reflect tagging artifact and does not appear relevant to the vulnerability mechanics.

Know when Niagara Framework gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (Honeywell) PRIMARY 5.2 MEDIUM
AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
vuln.today AI 5.2 MEDIUM

Adjacent vector and PR:H both confirmed by exploitation preconditions; C:H reflects information disclosure of sensitive operational data with no availability impact.

3.1 AV:A/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (Honeywell).

CVSS VectorVendor: Honeywell

Attack Vector
Adjacent
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
High
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Jul 23, 2026 - 18:04 EUVD
CVE Published
Jul 23, 2026 - 15:07 cve.org
MEDIUM 5.2

DescriptionCVE.org

Improper handling of insufficient permissions or privileges vulnerability in Tridium Niagara Framework on Windows, Linux, QNX, Tridium Niagara Enterprise Security on Windows, Linux, QNX allows Privilege Abuse.

This issue affects Niagara Framework: before 4.14.6, before 4.15.5; Niagara Enterprise Security: before 4.14.6, before 4.15.5.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.1%
Top 95% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
widely deployed in commercial building automation and ICS environments
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.1%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation
None
System Exposure· derived
Controlled
Automatable
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium
Technical Impact
Partial

Priority Score

26
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +26
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy