Skip to main content

FreeRDP CVE-2026-109246

| EUVDEUVD-2026-97690 HIGH
Integer Underflow (CWE-191)
2026-10-12 VulnCheck GHSA-jpmc-9q62-wvpv
7.1
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: VulnCheck
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate to shadow server as client
  2. Exploit
    Send crafted Frame Acknowledge PDU
  3. Execution
    Underflow in-flight frame count
  4. Impact
    Divide-by-zero crashes server, disconnects viewers

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Integer underflow checks
Exploitation Conditions

Requires that the target run the freerdp-shadow-cli shadow server (a non-default, uncommon FreeRDP deployment mode used for screen sharing), and that the attacker hold a valid authenticated client session (CVSS PR:L). The specific trigger is a Frame Acknowledge PDU whose frame id is exactly one greater than the last frame the server sent, which is stored without a range check and underflows the in-flight frame count in shadow_encoder_inflight_frames(), reaching the divide-by-zero in shadow_encoder_create_frame_id(). Exploitation is LIMITED by the need for valid authentication and by the fact that the vulnerable shadow server is rarely deployed in production; no user interaction is required (UI:N) and complexity is low once authenticated.

Impact

This is a moderate, availability-only denial-of-service issue, not a critical priority. The provided CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H) correctly reflects the impact: network-reachable, low complexity, but requiring an authenticated session (PR:L) and causing only an availability impact (VA:H) with no confidentiality or integrity effect. No EPSS score was supplied, so statistical exploitation probability cannot be weighed. The CVE is NOT in CISA KEV and no public exploit code was referenced, so there is no public exploit identified at time of analysis. SSVC inputs (exploitation status, automatable, technical impact) were not provided and cannot be assessed from the input. The signals are internally consistent - there is no CVSS-vs-description conflict - but the real-world impact is limited to crashing a running freerdp-shadow-cli process and disconnecting its viewers; it does not yield code execution or data exposure. Note the input Tags label this 'Information Disclosure,' which contradicts the vector's VC:N (no confidentiality impact) and the DoS-only description; treat the DoS characterization as authoritative. Overall this is a legitimate but lower-tier fix-when-convenient issue, materially constrained by the authentication requirement and the niche nature of the affected component.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already holds valid credentials to a running freerdp-shadow-cli shadow server connects as a client and sends a Frame Acknowledge PDU referencing a frame id one greater than the last frame the server sent. The resulting in-flight frame count underflow drives a divide-by-zero (SIGFPE) that crashes the server and disconnects every connected viewer. No public exploit code was identified, and the attack requires an authenticated session and low complexity (CVSS AC:L/PR:L).

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
Patch available 0.3% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 12, 2026

A divide-by-zero in FreeRDP's freerdp-shadow-cli shadow server (versions before 3.32.0) allows an authenticated client to crash the process by sending a Frame Acknowledge PDU with a frame id one greater than the last frame sent, disconnecting all viewers. Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session and only affects the non-default shadow server deployment; no user interaction is needed and complexity is low. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and the impact is availability-only (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H).

RemediationAI

Upgrade FreeRDP to version 3.32.0 or later, which includes the fix per the vendor advisory GHSA-6vjv-4hm3-6698. If upgrading is not immediately possible, avoid running the freerdp-shadow-cli shadow server in untrusted networks, or restrict access to it by requiring authentication and limiting connections to trusted clients; note that the vulnerability still requires a valid authenticated session, so strong authentication policies reduce exposure. Alternatively, disable the shadow server feature if it is not needed. There is no known workaround that specifically prevents the divide-by-zero beyond applying the patch. Monitor the advisory for further details.

Affected VersionsENISA

FreeRDP 0 <3.32.0

Affected Packages

euvd freerdp fix: 3.32.0

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

FreeRDP is an open-source Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) client and library. The freerdp-shadow-cli component provides a shadow server for screen sharing, where the server sends frame updates to connected viewers. The vulnerability is a CWE-191 integer underflow: the Frame Acknowledge PDU from a client carries a frame id that is stored without validating it against the last frame sent, so a client can acknowledge a frame id one greater than the last frame, causing the in-flight frame count computed in shadow_encoder_inflight_frames() to underflow. That underflowed value then feeds into shadow_encoder_create_frame_id(), where a division by zero occurs, raising SIGFPE and terminating the shadow server process. The affected CPE is cpe:2.3:a:freerdp:freerdp:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* (all versions before the fix); authentication is required (PR:L in the CVSS vector).

Know when Freerdp gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (VulnCheck) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
vuln.today AI 6.5 MEDIUM

Network-reachable but requires an authenticated client session (PR:L) with low complexity; impact is a process crash, so A:H with C:N/I:N and unchanged scope.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N
Red Hat 6.5 MEDIUM

Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).

CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
None
Vulnerable system: Availability
High
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

Lifecycle Timeline

2
Patch available
Oct 12, 2026 - 18:03 EUVD
CVE Published
Oct 12, 2026 - 16:04 cve.org
HIGH 7.1

DescriptionCVE.org

FreeRDP before 3.32.0 contains a divide-by-zero vulnerability in the freerdp-shadow-cli shadow server: the frame id in a client's Frame Acknowledge PDU is stored without a range check, so the in-flight frame count in shadow_encoder_inflight_frames() can underflow. An authenticated client can acknowledge a frame id one greater than the last frame sent, causing shadow_encoder_create_frame_id() to divide by zero (SIGFPE) and terminate the process, disconnecting all viewers.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

FreeRDP's shadow server (freerdp-shadow-cli) versions before 3.32.0 are vulnerable to a denial-of-service attack that allows an authenticated user to crash the service, disconnecting all active viewers. This affects organizations that deploy the non-default shadow server for remote support or collaboration, potentially disrupting critical support sessions. Leadership should be aware because while exploitation requires authentication and the impact is availability-only, the lack of a vendor patch means mitigation relies on access controls and monitoring until a fix is released.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; interim mitigations include restricting network access to the shadow server to trusted IP addresses, ensuring only authorized users can establish authenticated sessions, disabling the shadow server if not operationally required, and monitoring process logs for unexpected crashes to detect exploitation attempts.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.3%
Top 78% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
FreeRDP common as client library, but shadow server rarely deployed
Data Quality
5 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.3%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Medium

Priority Score

36
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Integer overflow occurs when an arithmetic operation produces a result that exceeds the maximum value a given integer type can store.

CVE-2026-25997 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 25

Use-after-free in FreeRDP xf_clipboard_format_equal before 3.23.0. Clipboard format comparison uses freed memory. Fifth

CVE-2026-25953 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 25

Use-after-free in FreeRDP xf_AppUpdateWindowFromSurface before 3.23.0. Surface-to-window update triggers memory corrupti

CVE-2026-25952 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 25

Use-after-free in FreeRDP xf_SetWindowMinMaxInfo before version 3.23.0. X11 client window management triggers memory cor

CVE-2026-25959 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 25

Use-after-free in FreeRDP xf_cliprdr_provide_data clipboard handling before 3.23.0. Clipboard data exchange triggers mem

CVE-2026-22857 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FreeRDP IRP thread handler has a use-after-free where the IRP is freed by Complete() then accessed on the error path. Fi

CVE-2026-22854 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FreeRDP drive read heap overflow when server-controlled read length exceeds IRP output buffer. Fixed in 3.20.1. PoC avai

CVE-2026-22852 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FreeRDP client before 3.20.1 has a heap buffer overflow in AUDIN format processing. A malicious RDP server can corrupt m

CVE-2026-25955 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 25

Use-after-free in FreeRDP xf_AppUpdateWindowFromSurface before 3.23.0. Different code path from CVE-2026-25953. PoC and

CVE-2024-32041 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 22

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability

CVE-2023-40574 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 31

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), released under the Apache license. Rated critical

CVE-2023-40569 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 31

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), released under the Apache license. Rated critical

CVE-2023-40567 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 31

FreeRDP is a free implementation of the Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), released under the Apache license. Rated critical

Vendor StatusVendor

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy