Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCompromise renderer via separate bug
-
DeliveryServe crafted HTML page
-
ExploitTrigger use-after-free on released Session resource
-
ExecutionSpoof browser UI elements
-
ImpactDeceive user into trusting fake UI
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Operation on resource after expiration or release
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires that the attacker has ALREADY compromised Chrome's renderer process (a prior, separate vulnerability or foothold) - this is the primary gating condition, stated explicitly in the description. Beyond that, the victim must load attacker-controlled content: a crafted HTML page is delivered and user interaction is required (UI:R), and the high attack complexity (AC:H) indicates the use-after-free on the released Session resource is not reliably triggered. The realized impact is limited to spoofing UI elements, not code execution or data exfiltration. These factors - mandatory pre-compromise of the renderer, user interaction, and high complexity - substantially limit real-world exploitability despite the network attack vector. Affected: Google Chrome before 155.0.8059.39 (fixed in 155.0.8059.39). |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue, and the multiple signals agree rather than conflict. CVSS 3.1 base is 4.2 (Low) with AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R, and crucially the description adds a prerequisite the CVSS vector does not capture: the attacker 'had compromised the renderer process' already. That is a significant precondition - this is a post-renderer-compromise UI-spoofing primitive, not a standalone remote exploit, so the effective privilege requirement is much higher than the PR:N in the vector suggests (verify the PR:N interpretation: Chrome's threat model treats renderer compromise as a baseline, which is why PR:N was used, but operationally a prior foothold is required). SSVC reinforces low priority: Exploitation=none, Automatable=no, Technical Impact=partial. No EPSS score was provided, there is no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC is indicated. Chromium itself rated this Low severity. The impact is limited to spoofing UI elements (chrome/browser UI deception) rather than code execution or data theft. Net: a real but low-severity defense-in-depth bug relevant mainly as one link in a larger renderer-compromise chain, not an urgent standalone threat. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who has already exploited a separate bug to gain control of Chrome's renderer process uses this use-after-free on a released Session resource to manipulate what the browser displays, spoofing UI elements via a crafted HTML page to deceive the user (e.g., faking security indicators or dialogs). No public exploit code is identified, and the high attack complexity plus the requirement for a pre-compromised renderer and user interaction make opportunistic exploitation unlikely. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 07, 2026
UI spoofing in Google Chrome builds prior to 155.0.8059.39 lets an attacker who has already compromised the browser's renderer process present falsified interface elements to the victim through a crafted HTML page. The precondition of an existing renderer foothold, combined with required user interaction and the high attack complexity of reliably triggering the underlying use-after-release on a Session object, sharply limits practical exploitation - the realized effect is spoofed UI, not code execution or data theft. No public exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, CISA's SSVC assessment records exploitation as none, and Google classifies the underlying Chromium issue as low severity, making this a routine, low-priority patching item.
RemediationAI
Vendor-released patch: Google Chrome 155.0.8059.39 - update through Chrome's built-in updater or your enterprise package management channel and confirm the running build at chrome://version, restarting the browser so the new binary is actually loaded; the release notes are at https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/10/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_086471744.html. Because exploitation requires that the attacker has already compromised the renderer process, the most effective compensating control is preventing that initial foothold - keep Chrome and all browser extensions current, enforce site isolation and the existing renderer sandbox (both are on by default and materially reduce what a compromised renderer can reach), and restrict or remove untrusted/abandoned extensions; the trade-off for extension cleanup is loss of functionality, but it directly removes a common renderer-compromise path. Until patching completes, reducing exposure to untrusted HTML - for example by blocking unvetted sites or untrusted attachments at the web gateway - lowers the chance a crafted page is rendered, though it has the side effect of blocking legitimate content and is not a substitute for the update. Disabling JavaScript entirely would blunt page-based UI spoofing but breaks most sites and is not recommended as a general measure; the SSVC assessment (Exploitation: none, Automatable: no) supports treating this as a scheduled patch rather than an emergency response.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The root cause is CWE-672, Use of a Released Resource, a memory-lifetime defect closely related to use-after-free: a Session-related object is released and then referenced again while a page is being processed. Because the defect lives in the browser's rendering path and the attacker is presumed to have already compromised the renderer process, the flaw is exploitable only from an already-untrusted rendering context - it does not, on its own, provide a sandbox escape or privilege boundary crossing. The affected component maps to the CPE cpe:2.3:a:google:chrome:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*, i.e. all Chrome builds before the fixed release, and the corresponding Chromium tracking issue is 556258544. The delivered payload is a crafted HTML page (UI:R) and the assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N reflects a high-complexity, low-integrity-impact condition with no confidentiality or availability effect, consistent with UI spoofing rather than memory corruption leading to code execution.
Know when the next one hits your stack
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
AC:H and UI:R reflect the hard-to-trigger UAF and required page load; impact is UI spoofing so I:L with C/A:N; PR:N kept per Chrome's renderer threat model though a prior renderer compromise is required.
Primary rating from Vendor (Chrome).
CVSS VectorVendor: Chrome
Lifecycle Timeline
4DescriptionCVE.org
Use of released resource in Session in Google Chrome prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
EUVD-2026-93651
GHSA-9rjj-4c64-h8fp
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB