GHSA-jj44-m59q-wmrj
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain man-in-the-middle network position
-
DeliveryPresent certificate with non-canonical IP encoding
-
ExploitNode TLS fails to reject it
-
ExecutionSession accepted as trusted peer
-
ImpactIntercept and alter TLS traffic
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A07:2025 - Authentication Failures
ASVS 5.0
V12 - Secure Communication Certificate validation
|
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an attacker-in-the-middle position on the TLS path and a peer identified/validated by IP address, where Node.js accepts a certificate presenting the IP in a non-canonical representation instead of rejecting it (CWE-295). Limiting factors: the CVSS vector sets AC:H, indicating non-trivial preconditions (notably the MITM position and a crafted certificate); no authentication or user interaction is required of the attacker per PR:N/UI:N. The precise feature/configuration that must be in use (e.g., IP-based certificate verification path) is implied by the fix but not spelled out in the available sources, so affected deployment modes beyond IP-identified TLS connections are unverified. Affected versions are Node 26.12.0, 24.22.0, and 22.23.3 and earlier on those branches; the vendor fix (26.12.1 and companion releases) is the remediation and updating is the stated path. |
| Impact | This is a TLS certificate-validation flaw (CWE-295) in Node.js fixed in the 2026-10-21 security releases. The vendor CVSS:3.0 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N, 7.4 High) indicates a network-reachable issue needing no privileges or user interaction but with High attack complexity, consistent with a flaw that requires an attacker-in-the-middle position and a specially shaped certificate rather than a simple direct request. Exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' for working code, but a public PoC reference exists (a gist); it is not verified as working exploit code, so POC availability must not be read as active exploitation. There is no EPSS score in the input and no CISA KEV listing, so there is no evidence of widespread or active exploitation; the vuln.today decision label is 'this_week', indicating prompt but non-emergency patching. The signals are internally consistent: High severity driven by confidentiality/integrity impact (MITM) rather than ease of exploitation, tempered by AC:H and no confirmed in-the-wild use. The AC:H in the input is a severity metric and is not explained by the available sources as any specific race or timing condition; the exact trigger mechanism beyond 'reject non-canonical IP addresses' is not described in the available sources. Net: a real priority for Node.js operators to patch this week, but not an emergency absent KEV/EPSS escalation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker positioned to intercept TLS traffic (e.g., on a shared or compromised network path) presents a certificate whose IP address is encoded in a non-canonical form that a vulnerable Node.js client fails to reject, allowing the attacker's endpoint to be accepted as the intended IP-identified peer. This enables interception and tampering of the TLS session (MITM). A public PoC reference exists; it is not verified as working exploit code, and the precise triggering steps are not described in the available sources. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 23, 2026
Node.js TLS certificate validation can accept a peer certificate that presents an IP address in a non-canonical representation instead of rejecting it, undermining identity checks for IP-addressed TLS peers; affected versions are 26.12.0, 24.22.0, and 22.23.3 and earlier on those branches. An attacker positioned to intercept the TLS path and able to supply a crafted certificate could exploit this to impersonate an IP-identified peer, with high confidentiality and integrity impact but no authentication or user interaction required. The vendor fixed the issue in the 2026-10-21 security release v26.12.1; a public PoC reference exists but is not verified as working exploit code, and no confirmed active exploitation is reported in the supplied intelligence.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Node.js to a fixed security release from 2026-10-21: v26.12.1 is the exact Current-line fixed version supplied in the data, and the Node.js October 2026 security advisory at https://nodejs.org/en/blog/vulnerability/october-2026-security-releases identifies the corresponding patched releases for the 24.x and 22.x branches. Updating is the vendor's stated remediation, and the v26.12.1 release notes at https://github.com/nodejs/node/releases/tag/v26.12.1 document the TLS change 'reject non-canonical IP addresses' together with related TLS normalization fixes. No specific alternative workaround is documented in the supplied sources; if an immediate upgrade is not possible, avoid relying on IP-address-based TLS peer validation for security decisions until the patch is applied, with the trade-off that IP-pinned authentication would no longer be enforced.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw is in Node.js TLS certificate identity handling and is classified as CWE-295, Improper Certificate Validation. The release notes group CVE-2026-106069 with CVE-2026-106072 under the change 'tls: reject non-canonical IP addresses', and a related fix 'tls: fix ip normalization regression' (CVE-2026-105483) appears in the same release, indicating the defect concerns IP address normalization/canonicalization during certificate validation. The assessed exploitation precondition is an attacker-in-the-middle position on the TLS path plus a peer identified or validated by IP address, where Node.js accepts a certificate carrying the IP in a non-canonical form that should be rejected. The supplied sources do not spell out which specific Node.js API, option, or deployment mode must be in use beyond IP-based TLS peer validation, so additional affected configurations are unverified; the CVSS vector's AC:H reflects the non-trivial MITM and crafted-certificate preconditions, while PR:N/UI:N indicates no attacker authentication or victim interaction.
Know when Node.js gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Network-reachable TLS validation bypass needing a MITM position and crafted certificate (AC:H, PR:N, UI:N); interception enables read and tamper (C:H/I:H), no availability impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (CNA).
CVSS VectorVendor
Lifecycle Timeline
2Description PRE-NVD
Technical POC Analysis
CWE-295, Improper Certificate Validation.
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Latest POC
1 PoC candidate from github (unverified)
Sign in to open the public PoC links collected for this CVE.
Executive ViewAI
Node.js TLS certificate validation flaw (CVE-2026-106069) allows a network attacker to impersonate IP-addressed peers, impacting confidentiality and integrity of internal communications. Organizations relying on Node.js for secure service-to-service or client-server TLS are exposed, requiring leadership attention due to potential data breaches and trust erosion.
Apply vendor patch.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Remote code execution in n8n's workflow expression evaluation system allows an authenticated user with workflow creation
A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Eval injection vulnerability in the internals.batch function in lib/batch.js in the bassmaster plugin before 1.5.2 for t
Flowise version 3.0.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the CustomMCP node. The mcpServerConfig paramete
Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was inc
An issue was discovered in the node-serialize package 0.0.4 for Node.js. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulner
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary fi
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Manage Accounts page in the AccountManagement.asmx service in the Solarwin
The JS-YAML module before 2.0.5 for Node.js parses input without properly considering the unsafe !!js/function tag, whic
EUVD-2026-109107
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
VulDB
Exploit-DB