Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate as Editor-role user
-
ExploitInvoke plugin settings handler
-
ImpactDisclose arbitrary WordPress option values
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires an authenticated WordPress account with the Editor role or higher on a site running Booking Calendar between version 10.15 and before 11.8.3; the attacker must reach one specific plugin settings handler that fails to restrict which options a lower-privileged user may load. There are no network-perimeter or configuration prerequisites beyond the plugin being installed and active, but the PR:H requirement is the key limiting factor - this cannot be triggered by anonymous or Subscriber/Author-level users, only by already-trusted high-privilege (non-admin) accounts, which sharply narrows the realistic attacker population to insiders or compromised Editor credentials. |
| Impact | This is a genuinely low-priority issue, and the signals are consistent rather than conflicting. The provided CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N, base 2.7) correctly reflects a low-severity information disclosure: network-reachable and low-complexity, but gated behind high privileges (PR:H - an authenticated Editor-or-above account) with only limited confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability impact. No EPSS score, KEV listing, or SSVC decision data was supplied, and no public exploit is referenced - only a WPScan advisory entry. The realistic risk is that an already-trusted but non-admin user (Editor) can read WordPress options they should not see, which is primarily a privilege-boundary/lateral-information issue rather than an external compromise vector. The one caveat worth verifying with the vendor is impact scope: the description says 'arbitrary WordPress options, including core site configuration,' and because wp_options can hold secrets such as API keys, SMTP credentials, or third-party tokens, the real confidentiality impact could exceed the C:L rating depending on what a given site stores - but absent confirmation this is treated as C:L, not escalated. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A site operator grants a content contributor an Editor-role account; that user (or someone who phishes/compromises the Editor login) invokes the plugin's vulnerable settings handler to read option values across the entire WordPress installation, potentially harvesting core site configuration and any secrets stored in wp_options. No public proof-of-concept is referenced, and exploitation requires an existing authenticated Editor-or-higher session, so this is an insider/privilege-boundary scenario rather than opportunistic remote attack. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Booking Calendar, a WordPress plugin, fails to restrict which WordPress options a lower-privileged user can retrieve through one of its settings handlers, so an authenticated account holding the Editor role or higher can read the values of arbitrary entries in the site's options table - including core site configuration - in plugin versions from 10.15 up to but not including 11.8.3. The issue is rated CVSS 3.1 2.7 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N), reflecting a network-reachable but high-privilege-only path with limited confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability effect. No public exploit code or confirmed active exploitation has been identified at time of analysis, and the practical risk is concentrated on sites that hand Editor-level access to untrusted or compromised accounts. A vendor-released patch exists: 11.8.3.
RemediationAI
Upgrade Booking Calendar to version 11.8.3 or later - this is the vendor-released fix and closes the unvalidated-option-load path; the update is distributed through the standard WordPress plugin update mechanism from the WordPress.org repository. If an immediate upgrade is not possible, the most direct compensating control is to deactivate the plugin until patching can be scheduled, accepting that all booking functionality goes offline. A narrower interim option is to reduce the plugin's exposure to lower-trust accounts by tightening role assignments: remove Editor-level privileges, or the specific Booking Calendar management capability, from any user who does not genuinely require them, which limits the population of accounts that can reach the vulnerable handler but does nothing for legitimate Editors (who remain able to exploit it) and can disrupt normal editorial workflow. Because the vulnerability discloses arbitrary option values, any site that ran a vulnerable version with untrusted Editor accounts should treat wp_options contents as potentially leaked and rotate any secrets stored there - third-party API keys, SMTP and payment/SMS gateway credentials - and confirm that the site URL and administrator email values have not been altered via other means. Refer to the WPScan advisory (https://wpscan.com/vulnerability/9d6e9047-410e-4d3d-81f0-e3f89cf7a494/) and the NVD entry (https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2026-105195) for the authoritative fix version and any vendor-supplied guidance; monitoring plugin changelogs for 11.8.3 is advisable to confirm the deployed build matches the patched release.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The flaw sits in WordPress plugin settings-handling code and is classified as CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor). WordPress stores most site-wide configuration in the wp_options table: the site URL, administrator email address, plugin and theme settings, and frequently third-party API keys, SMTP credentials and integration secrets. The Booking Calendar settings handler accepts an option identifier from the request but does not validate it against a per-capability allowlist - it verifies only that the caller can reach the handler at all. Because the handler is reachable by any user with the Editor role or higher (PR:H in the CVSS vector), an attacker who already holds such an account can supply arbitrary option names and have their values returned. The access control boundary that should have been enforced - restricting readable options to those a given role is entitled to - is missing, turning a routine settings endpoint into a read oracle over the options table. The AV:N/AC:L/UI:N portion of the vector means no user interaction or special network position is needed once an eligible account exists, while S:U, C:L and the absent I/A components confirm the impact is limited to low-severity information disclosure confined to the WordPress instance.
Know when WordPress gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Editor-role account required so PR:H; reachable over the network via the plugin handler (AV:N/AC:L/UI:N); only option values are read, so C:L and I:A none.
Primary rating from Vendor (wpscan).
CVSS VectorVendor: wpscan
Lifecycle Timeline
3DescriptionCVE.org
The Booking Calendar WordPress plugin before 11.8.3 does not adequately restrict which options a lower-privileged user can load through one of its settings handlers, allowing users with the Editor role and above to disclose the values of arbitrary WordPress options, including core site configuration.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
The mailSend function in the isMail transport in PHPMailer before 5.2.18 might allow remote attackers to pass extra para
The isMail transport in PHPMailer before 5.2.20 might allow remote attackers to pass extra parameters to the mail comman
The Backup Migration plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution in all versions up to, and including, 1
The Hash Form - Drag & Drop Form Builder plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file uploads due to missing fil
Authentication bypass in the LiteSpeed Cache WordPress plugin (versions prior to 6.5.0.1) allows unauthenticated remote
The GiveWP - Donation Plugin and Fundraising Platform plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all
The Simple File List plugin for WordPress through version 4.2.2 contains an unauthenticated remote code execution vulner
The AI Engine WordPress plugin through version 3.1.3 exposes Bearer Token values through the /mcp/v1/ REST API endpoint
The SureTriggers WordPress plugin through version 1.0.82 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows unaut
The Ninja Forms plugin before 2.9.42.1 for WordPress allows remote attackers to conduct PHP object injection attacks via
The Business Directory Plugin - Easy Listing Directories for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to time-based
Remote code execution in WordPress 6.9.x (before 6.9.5) and 7.0.x (before 7.0.2) arises from a REST API batch endpoint r
EUVD-2026-94767
GHSA-2c7f-rp38-5cq9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB