Skip to main content

IBM Langflow OSS CVE-2026-104310

| EUVDEUVD-2026-113149 MEDIUM
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) (CWE-918)
2026-10-29 ibm GHSA-6gwq-3fgh-99pv
4.3
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: ibm
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Authenticate with low-privilege credentials
  2. Exploit
    Submit request with attacker-controlled URL
  3. Execution
    Server performs forged outbound request
  4. Impact
    Retrieve sensitive information from response

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V4 - API and Web Service URL allowlisting, SSRF prevention
MITRE ATT&CK

2 techniques across 2 tactics: Initial Access, Credential Access

The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up.

Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires a valid authenticated session on the Langflow OSS instance (CVSS PR:L), limiting it to attackers who already have at least low-privilege access; it is not a remote-unauthenticated flaw. No user interaction is required (UI:N) and the vector is network-reachable (AV:N). The description does not name the specific endpoint, feature, or configuration that triggers the SSRF, so the exact trigger is not described in the available sources. Affected deployments are IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.12.3; the principal limiting factors are the authentication requirement and the confidentiality-only, low-magnitude impact (C:L, I:N, A:N).

Impact

This is a moderate-severity SSRF (CWE-918) with a vendor-assigned CVSS 3.1 base score of 4.3 (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N). The signals are consistent and point to a limited, non-urgent issue rather than a top-priority emergency: the attack vector is network-based and complexity is low, but exploitation requires low-level authentication (PR:L), the scope is unchanged (S:U), and impact is confined to a low confidentiality loss with no integrity or availability impact (I:N/A:N). No EPSS score was supplied, so quantitative exploitation probability cannot be stated. The CVE is not listed in CISA KEV and no public exploit or PoC reference is provided, so there is no evidence of active exploitation. The vendor (IBM) is both the reporter and patch source, and the vuln.today priority 'this_month' aligns with a patch-when-convenient posture rather than act_now. Net: a real but lower-tier issue - an authenticated SSRF that can leak sensitive information, warranting patching within a normal cycle, not emergency response.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

A remote attacker who already holds valid low-privilege credentials on an IBM Langflow OSS instance submits a request that coerces the server into making an attacker-controlled outbound request, returning sensitive information such as internal service responses or cloud metadata. Because the CVSS vector is AV:N/AC:L with low attack complexity, the request itself is straightforward once authenticated, but no public exploit code or PoC reference is provided and the trigger is not described in the available sources.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
Patch available 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 29, 2026

Server-side request forgery (CWE-918) in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 lets a remote authenticated attacker with low privileges (CVSS PR:L) induce the server to make requests on their behalf, exposing limited confidential information (C:L, I:N, A:N) for a base score of 4.3. No user interaction is required and the flaw is network-reachable, but exploitation depends on an existing valid session on the Langflow instance, so the barrier is access rather than complexity. Exploitation has not been confirmed as active (no CISA KEV listing), no public exploit code is identified in the supplied data, and the specific endpoint or feature that triggers the SSRF is not described in the available sources.

RemediationAI

IBM states a patch is available from the vendor; consult the advisory at https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/7293015 for the exact fixed version to upgrade to, since the supplied data does not enumerate a specific release number beyond marking affected versions as 1.0.0 through 1.12.3. Until the upgrade is applied, the practical constraint is that exploitation requires a valid low-privileged authenticated session, so reducing the population holding Langflow credentials and limiting network exposure of the Langflow service to trusted users lowers the attack surface, with the trade-off of restricting legitimate self-service access to the platform. Because outbound requests originate from the Langflow host itself, restricting that host's egress to only the destinations your flows genuinely need (for example by firewall or proxy allowlist) contains the SSRF read path, at the cost of breaking any flows that legitimately call external or internal services outside the allowlist. The supplied sources do not name the affected endpoint, so endpoint-level blocking cannot be prescribed from this data; verify with the vendor advisory before relying on any configuration-level workaround.

Affected VersionsENISA

Langflow OSS 1.0.0 ≤1.12.3

Affected Packages

euvd langflow_oss no fix

Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)

Affects your stack

Affects 1 package in euvd

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

Langflow is a low-code platform for building LLM-powered applications and flows, and the flaw is classified CWE-918 (Server-Side Request Forgery), meaning a server-side component accepts a user-influenced destination and performs the request from the Langflow host's network position. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:ibm:langflow_oss:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* corresponds to the IBM-branded Langflow OSS distribution, with the advisory scoping affected releases to 1.0.0 through 1.12.3. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N indicates the attacker needs a low-privileged authenticated session, that the attack is straightforward once that session exists, that no victim interaction is needed, and that the resulting scope is unchanged with only a low confidentiality impact and no integrity or availability effect - consistent with reading responses or metadata from internal endpoints rather than gaining code execution. The sources do not identify which Langflow API route, flow component, or configuration option performs the unfiltered request, so the precise trigger and any allowlist or proxy behavior are unverified from the available evidence.

Know when Langflow Oss gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (ibm) PRIMARY 4.3 MEDIUM
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
vuln.today AI 4.3 MEDIUM

Network-reachable SSRF needing a low-privilege authenticated session (PR:L, AC:L, UI:N); impact is limited information disclosure (C:L), with no integrity or availability effect.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (ibm).

CVSS VectorVendor: ibm

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Medium
popular open-source LLM app builder, common in AI dev but not ubiquitous
Data Quality
3 sources
Confidence: Low

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC No
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available Yes
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
None
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

22
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +22
PoC: 0
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Server-Side Request Forgery exploits applications that fetch remote resources based on user-supplied URLs.

CVE-2026-9198 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets any network-reachable attac

CVE-2026-19295 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Aug 28

Authenticated command injection in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 lets any logged-in flow user escalate to arbitr

CVE-2026-7873 CRITICAL POC
9.9 Jun 30

Code injection in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an authenticated user execute arbitrary operating-

CVE-2026-93674 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 07

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 lets any attacker who can reach the servi

CVE-2026-18729 HIGH POC
8.8 Aug 28

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 allows a network-accessible authenticated attacker with l

CVE-2026-93680 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 29

IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to bypass security restrictions through im

CVE-2026-10561 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Jun 22

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.9.3 allows attackers to fully comprom

CVE-2026-12940 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 30

Unauthenticated remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.1 allows remote attackers to run arbitrary

CVE-2026-9103 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 17

Authentication bypass in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.10.0 lets an unauthenticated remote attacker retrieve a long-l

CVE-2026-81204 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote code execution in IBM Langflow OSS versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5 allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to run

CVE-2026-79724 CRITICAL
9.8 Sep 10

Remote OS command execution in IBM Langflow OSS (versions 1.0.0 through 1.11.5) lets remote attackers run arbitrary oper

CVE-2026-7646 MEDIUM POC
6.5 Aug 05

Path traversal in IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0-1.10.3 exposes arbitrary server filesystem files via a crafted MCP `resources/r

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy