Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessCraft TNEF file with multiple message bodies
-
DeliveryDeliver via email attachment
-
ExploitVictim extracts file with tnef
-
ExecutionTrigger use-after-free/double-free
-
ImpactProcess crash / denial of service
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Memory lifecycle management
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Execution, Privilege Escalation The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires the victim to extract/process an attacker-supplied TNEF (Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format, 'winmail.dat') file that specifically contains multiple message bodies - this crafted multi-body structure is the trigger condition. Exploitation is limited by required user interaction or automated processing (UI:R): the file must reach a tnef extraction step, typically via an email attachment opened by a user or auto-decoded by a mail gateway. No authentication is needed on the target (PR:N), but there is no network-service listening component - tnef is a client/utility file parser, so the attack depends entirely on getting the malicious file ingested. Impact is confined to crashing the extraction process (availability only); no confidentiality or integrity impact is indicated. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but modest-severity denial-of-service issue, not a high-priority remote code execution case despite the CWE-416 (use-after-free) and double-free classification. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H = 6.5 MEDIUM) shows the network reachability comes only through delivering a malicious file that a victim must process (UI:R), and the impact is strictly availability (C:N/I:N) - the stated outcome is an application crash. No EPSS score, CISA KEV listing, or public proof-of-concept was provided in the intelligence, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis.' A use-after-free/double-free can sometimes be escalated beyond a crash, but neither the description nor the references claim memory-disclosure or code-execution impact, so treating this as DoS-only is correct. One signal to reconcile: the vendor-supplied A:H (high availability impact) is generous for a transient crash of a per-invocation command-line extraction utility - in practice the failure affects only the single parsing process, so real availability impact is closer to A:L; verify against how tnef is deployed (interactive vs. automated mail-gateway pipeline) before prioritizing. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker crafts a malicious winmail.dat / TNEF file containing multiple message bodies and emails it to a victim or feeds it into an automated mail-processing pipeline. When the recipient or server extracts the attachment with tnef, improper memory management triggers a use-after-free and double-free, crashing the extraction process and denying that extraction. No public exploit code was identified, and successful triggering requires the victim to actually process the attacker-supplied file (UI:R). |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 01, 2026
Extracting a specially crafted Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format (TNEF, "winmail.dat") file that contains multiple message bodies can crash the tnef utility through a use-after-free and double-free in its memory handling. The flaw is remotely reachable without credentials (PR:N), but exploitation depends on the malicious file actually reaching a tnef parsing step, which requires user interaction such as opening an email attachment or an automated mail gateway decoding it (UI:R). Impact is confined to availability - our independent assessment rates this as a modest-severity denial of service (A:L) rather than the vendor's higher 6.5 score, and no public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis.
RemediationAI
No vendor-released patch or fixed version was identified at time of analysis, so remediation should focus on reducing exposure until an upstream fix and distribution update appear; track https://github.com/verdammelt/tnef and https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2544477 for the patch, and apply the updated package as soon as it is published. As compensating controls, disable automatic decoding or extraction of "winmail.dat"/TNEF attachments in mail gateways and clients so that attack files are never parsed automatically, and strip or quarantine TNEF attachments at the mail boundary - the trade-off is that legitimate Outlook rich-text formatting, embedded objects, and calendar/vCard data carried in TNEF will be lost for recipients. Where tnef extraction must remain available, run it as an unprivileged user inside a sandbox or container with strict memory and CPU limits and no access to sensitive mounts, so that a crash from the use-after-free or double-free is contained rather than disruptive; this does not fix the underlying memory bug but bounds its effect. Users should also be trained not to open unexpected winmail.dat attachments, and any mail-processing pipeline that invokes tnef on untrusted input should be treated as an availability risk and rate-limited or isolated accordingly.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
TNEF is Microsoft's proprietary encapsulation format used by Outlook to ship rich message content as a "winmail.dat" attachment over MIME transports. The affected component is the open-source tnef command-line extractor (upstream repository github.com/verdammelt/tnef), typically written in C, which parses the TNEF stream and reconstructs the encapsulated message bodies and attachments. The root cause is CWE-416 (use-after-free): when a TNEF file declares multiple message body attributes, the parser's memory management for those bodies is mishandled, so a buffer is released and later dereferenced, and in some paths the same allocation is freed twice. This class of memory-corruption bug is trigged by malformed or unusual structural input rather than by a logic error in authentication or protocol handling, which is why the impact here is process crash (availability) rather than code execution in the assessed scenario. No CPE strings were supplied in the intelligence feed, but the Fedora packaging relationship and the Red Hat advisories indicate the vulnerable utility is distributed through Red Hat/Fedora channels.
Know when Tnef gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
File delivered remotely but requires victim processing (UI:R); crash affects only the single per-invocation extraction process, so A:L rather than the vendor's A:H; no C/I impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (fedora).
CVSS VectorVendor: fedora
DescriptionCVE.org
A flaw was found in tnef. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by providing a specially crafted Transport Neutral Encapsulation Format (TNEF) file containing multiple message bodies. During extraction, improper memory management triggers a use-after-free and double-free condition, causing the application to crash and resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Use-after-free vulnerabilities occur when a program continues to access memory through a pointer after that memory has been deallocated.
Memory corruption occurs when a program writes data beyond the boundaries of allocated memory regions or accesses memory in unintended ways, violating the integrity of the process's address space.
Denial of Service attacks render applications or systems unavailable by overwhelming resources or triggering failure conditions.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
An integer underflow has been identified in the unicode_to_utf8() function in tnef 1.4.14. Rated critical severity (CVSS
In tnef before 1.4.18, an attacker may be able to write to the victim's .ssh/authorized_keys file via an e-mail message
Processing a crafted TNEF file with uncompressed RTF data through tnef can trigger an out-of-bounds read in get_rtf_data
An issue was discovered in tnef before 1.4.13. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authentication r
An issue was discovered in tnef before 1.4.13. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authentication r
An issue was discovered in tnef before 1.4.13. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authentication r
An issue was discovered in tnef before 1.4.13. Rated high severity (CVSS 7.8), this vulnerability is no authentication r
Heap-based buffer overflow in the tnef command-line TNEF (winmail.dat) extractor allows a crafted TNEF file with a large
EUVD-2026-90772
GHSA-hh3v-7rq2-8fq9
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB