Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Network injection with no auth/UI, but AC:H reflects the required vulnerable Supabase Filters-String workflow; S:C because the impacted component is the separate database, with full read/update/delete CIA.
Primary rating from Vendor (VulnCheck).
CVSS VectorVendor: VulnCheck
Lifecycle Timeline
5DescriptionCVE.org
n8n versions before 1.123.80, from 2.0.0 before 2.39.6, and from 2.40.0 before 2.40.1 contain a filter injection vulnerability in the Supabase node's Filters (String) mode that fails to escape field values. Attackers can inject filter expressions from untrusted input to read all table rows, update all records, or delete entire tables in a single request.
Articles & Coverage 1
AnalysisAI
Unauthenticated filter injection in the n8n Supabase node's 'Filters (String)' mode allows attackers to manipulate PostgREST queries and read, update, or delete all records in connected Supabase tables in a single request. The flaw affects n8n versions before 1.123.80, 2.0.0 through 2.39.5, and 2.40.0, but only when a workflow passes untrusted input to the vulnerable node. …
Unlock full vulnerability intelligence
- Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
- Attack chain visualization
- Remediation with exact patch versions
- Threat intelligence from 22 sources
- Personal watchlist & email alerts
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata
Vulnerability AssessmentAI
| Exploitation | Requires an n8n workflow that uses the Supabase node specifically in 'Filters (String)' mode AND feeds attacker-influenced untrusted input (e.g. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment. |
| Risk Assessment | This is a genuine high-impact data-integrity/confidentiality flaw but with a meaningful configuration gate, so it sits between 'real priority' and 'situational'. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in. |
| Exploit Scenario | Full exploit scenario with step-by-step reproduction available after sign-in. |
| Remediation | Upgrade to n8n 1.123.80, 2.39.6, or 2.40.1 depending on the release branch. … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report. |
Recommended ActionAI
Within 24 hours, inventory all n8n instances and identify any using the Supabase node in 'Filters (String)' mode with untrusted input; if affected versions are present (before 1.123.80, 2.0.0 through 2.39.5, or 2.40.0), apply the vendor patch or upgrade to the vendor-recommended fixed release (patch available per vendor advisory), and restrict workflow inputs or disable the vulnerable node until patched. …
Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.
Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.
A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could
FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote
Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour
Eval injection vulnerability in the internals.batch function in lib/batch.js in the bassmaster plugin before 1.5.2 for t
Flowise version 3.0.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the CustomMCP node. The mcpServerConfig paramete
Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was inc
An issue was discovered in the node-serialize package 0.0.4 for Node.js. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulner
OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph
Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary fi
Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Manage Accounts page in the AccountManagement.asmx service in the Solarwin
The JS-YAML module before 2.0.5 for Node.js parses input without properly considering the unsafe !!js/function tag, whic
The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a
Same weakness CWE-89 – SQL Injection
View allShare
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2026-90642
GHSA-c6j4-7wv3-xqf9