Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach appliance setup interface during provisioning
-
DeliverySubmit path-traversal file-write request
-
ExploitEscape intended directory as service account
-
ExecutionOverwrite critical config/app file
-
ImpactCompromise integrity or force outage
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V5 - File Handling Path canonicalization, traversal prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Discovery, Collection The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires network access to the Kiteworks appliance SETUP interface, which per the vendor is not reachable on a fully-configured appliance in its default configuration. Exploitation is therefore limited to (1) the transient window while an appliance is first being provisioned, or (2) a non-default appliance configuration that leaves the setup interface exposed. Within that window no authentication is needed (PR:N) and no user interaction is required (UI:N), but the narrow reachability is the dominant limiting factor (AC:H). Impact is file write as the affected service account leading to integrity compromise or denial of service; the flaw does not by itself yield code execution. |
| Impact | This is a genuine but conditionally-gated flaw, not a top-tier priority. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H, 7.4) reads unauthenticated-network, which superficially suggests broad exposure - but the AC:H metric and the description together confirm the setup interface is NOT reachable on a fully-configured appliance in its default configuration. Exploitation is confined to the transient first-provisioning window or a non-default configuration that re-exposes the interface, which is exactly what justifies AC:H and materially narrows real-world risk despite PR:N. No EPSS score, no CISA KEV listing, and no public POC were provided, so exploitation status is 'no public exploit identified at time of analysis' - there is no signal of active or automated exploitation. Note the impact is integrity/availability only (C:N/I:H/A:H): the description explicitly stops at file write compromising appliance integrity or availability and does NOT claim code execution on its own, so this is not an RCE. Net: moderate severity gated by a narrow reach window; patch on the normal maintenance cycle rather than treating it as an emergency, but note that any appliance actively being provisioned is momentarily in the exposed state. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | During the window when a Kiteworks appliance is first being provisioned (or on an appliance deliberately left in a non-default configuration that keeps the setup interface reachable), an unauthenticated attacker with network access sends a request to the setup interface containing a traversal path, causing a file to be written outside the intended directory to any location the service account can write. The attacker overwrites a critical configuration or application file, corrupting appliance integrity or knocking it offline until an operator manually intervenes. No public exploit code has been identified. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Sep 30, 2026
Unauthenticated path traversal in the Kiteworks Core appliance setup interface allows an attacker who can reach that interface to write a file to any location writable by the appliance service account, enabling integrity compromise of the appliance or a denial-of-service condition that persists until an operator intervenes. The exposure is narrow: the setup interface is not reachable on a fully configured appliance in its default configuration, so exploitation is realistically limited to the transient provisioning window of a new appliance or a non-default configuration that leaves setup exposed, which is why AC:H applies despite PR:N and UI:N (CVSS 7.4). No public exploit code and no confirmed active exploitation were identified at time of analysis, and the flaw does not by itself provide code execution.
RemediationAI
Vendor advisory GHSA-vcx7-3759-27xm should be treated as the primary remediation source; the exact patched Kiteworks Core build is not specified in the data provided, so operators should obtain the current fixed release directly from Kiteworks and apply it (vendor advisory status: patch guidance available per vendor advisory, exact version not independently confirmed here). Because exposure depends entirely on reachability of the setup interface, the highest-value compensating controls are network-level: keep the setup/provisioning interface on an isolated management VLAN or behind a firewall/host ACL that permits only the administrators performing provisioning, and block it from general corporate and internet-facing networks - the trade-off is that provisioning must then be performed from an access-controlled jump host. Complete initial provisioning promptly so the appliance leaves the transient vulnerable window and the setup interface becomes unreachable in the default configuration, and audit existing appliances for non-default configurations that expose the setup endpoint, closing them (e.g., disabling any management interface binding or reverse-proxy rule that publishes setup) even though this may require re-architecting remote provisioning workflows. As a detection measure, monitor the appliance service account's writable paths for unexpected file creation or modification during provisioning windows, and monitor for anomalous network connections to the setup interface, since an attacker who exploits the write primitive is likely to trigger integrity or availability symptoms before an operator notices.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affected Packages
Source: OSV (Open Source Vulnerabilities)
Affects your stack
Affects 1 package in euvd
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected component is the setup/provisioning interface of the Kiteworks Core appliance, and the root cause is CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory, i.e., path traversal): a user-supplied file path was not confined to its intended directory before the service used it for a file write. Because validation of the path is missing rather than the write primitive itself being memory-unsafe, the realistic outcome is arbitrary file write with the privileges of the affected service account rather than direct code execution. The CPE entry cpe:2.3:a:kiteworks:core:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* uses a wildcard version, indicating that the advisory does not enumerate specific affected releases in the supplied data. The CVSS vector AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H confirms a network-reachable, unauthenticated, no-interaction attack whose reachability is the constraining factor; impact is scored only to integrity (I:H) and availability (A:H), with confidentiality explicitly unaffected (C:N), consistent with a file-write/overwrite primitive against an appliance service account.
Know when Kiteworks gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
AC:H because the setup interface is only reachable during provisioning or non-default config; PR:N/UI:N within that window; C:N as it is a write-only primitive with I:H/A:H (integrity/availability) impact.
Primary rating from Vendor (cisa-cg).
CVSS VectorVendor: cisa-cg
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionCVE.org
A Kiteworks appliance setup interface did not confine a user-supplied file path to its intended directory, which could allow an unauthenticated attacker to write a file to any location writable by the affected service account, potentially compromising the integrity of the appliance or rendering it unavailable until an operator intervenes. Exploitation requires network access to the affected interface, which is not reachable on a fully configured appliance in its default configuration; reaching it depends on either the transient window while an appliance is first being provisioned or a non-default appliance configuration.
Technical POC Analysis
CWE-22 (Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory).
Full technical POC analysis - root cause, step-by-step exploitation and patch breakdown - is part of the Pro and Business plans.
Executive ViewAI
Kiteworks Core appliances face a high-severity integrity and availability risk during initial provisioning or in non-default configurations where the setup interface remains reachable. Because the exposure is limited to that transient or misconfigured state, the immediate organizational impact is likely confined to newly deployed or improperly exposed appliances, but a successful attack could force operator intervention and disrupt secure file transfer services. Leadership should prioritize ensuring no setup interfaces are internet-facing and that provisioning is tightly controlled until a vendor fix is available.
No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis; restrict network access to the Kiteworks Core setup interface to trusted provisioning networks, complete provisioning promptly and verify the interface is disabled or unreachable afterward, monitor appliance integrity and availability, and apply vendor mitigation guidance when published.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Path traversal exploits occur when applications use user-controlled input to construct file system paths without proper validation.
Unauthenticated attackers who know a target's email address can take over Kiteworks Core accounts that use locally store
Improper certificate-assignment controls in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker
Stored cross-site scripting in Kiteworks Core (all versions prior to 9.5.0) enables unauthenticated attackers to persist
Authentication bypass in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway (versions before 9.5.0) lets unauthenticated remote attacker
Server-side request forgery in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway (versions before 9.5.0) lets a remote, unauthenticated
Server-side request forgery in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before 9.5.0 allows a remote, unauthenticated sender t
Unauthenticated server-side request forgery in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 lets a remote att
Server-side request forgery in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before 9.5.0 allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker
Server-side request forgery in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway (all versions before 9.5.0) lets a remote, unauthentic
Command injection in Kiteworks Core's internal cluster-management function allows an attacker who already has code execu
Sandbox escape in Kiteworks Core's document-conversion feature (CVE-2026-102125, CVSS 8.8) allows code already executing
Authenticated privilege escalation in Kiteworks PDN (the Accellion-line private data network) before version 9.1.0 lets
EUVD-2026-90295
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
GitHub
Exploit-DB