Skip to main content

Angular platform-server CVE-2026-101895

HIGH
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400)
2026-09-28 https://github.com/angular/angular GHSA-f67j-2jqw-jpq7
Share

Severity by source

vuln.today AI
7.5 HIGH

Trivial static payload sent remotely with no auth or interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); pure event-loop-freezing DoS gives A:H with C:N/I:N.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Estimated by vuln.today — no official severity rating has been published for this CVE yet.

Lifecycle Timeline

5
POC Analysis Generated
Sep 28, 2026 - 23:22 vuln.today
Metadata Corrected
Sep 28, 2026 - 22:40 vuln.today
tag: npm added
Metadata Corrected
Sep 28, 2026 - 22:40 vuln.today
tag: Angular added
Analysis Generated
Sep 28, 2026 - 22:01 vuln.today
CVE Published
Sep 28, 2026 - 21:31 cve.org
HIGH

DescriptionCVE.org

A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability exists in @angular/platform-server's DOM emulation parser (domino). When processing untrusted user input containing an incomplete DOCTYPE declaration ending with whitespace before EOF (such as <!DOCTYPE html ), the HTML parser enters an infinite synchronous loop, pegging CPU utilization at 100% and completely freezing the Node.js server process.

Technical Description

In Angular Server-Side Rendering (SSR), @angular/platform-server uses domino to parse and sanitize HTML bound through template bindings (such as [innerHTML]) or manipulated via DOM APIs.

In Domino's HTML parser (lib/HTMLParser.js), tokenizer states that specify fixed lookahead-such as after_doctype_name_state (lookahead = 6)-rely on the state handler function to explicitly advance the character index pointer (nextchar). While branches for whitespace, >, and keyword matching advance nextchar, the EOF branch (case -1: // EOF) emitted doctype and EOF tokens without advancing nextchar or transitioning out of the state:

javascript
case -1: // EOF
  forcequirks();
  emitDoctype();
  emitEOF();
  break;

Because nextchar remained unchanged pointing to the EOF marker character (\uFFFF), the scanner loop (while (nextchar < numchars)) repeatedly re-invoked after_doctype_name_state with codepoint = EOF indefinitely. In Node.js's single-threaded runtime, this synchronous loop starves the event loop entirely.

Impact & Reachability

  • Reachability: The vulnerability is reachable in any Angular SSR application where untrusted user input is bound to [innerHTML], interpolated into markup, or sanitized on the server.
  • Impact: Successful exploitation allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause an immediate Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a payload containing an incomplete DOCTYPE (e.g., <!DOCTYPE html ). The Node.js SSR process locks up at 100% CPU and ceases responding to all concurrent and subsequent HTTP requests.

Proof of Concept:

ts
import { Component } from '@angular/core';

@Component({
  selector: 'app-root',
  standalone: true,
  template: `<div [innerHTML]="payload"></div>`,
})
export class AppComponent {
  // Attacker-controlled input containing an incomplete DOCTYPE ending with whitespace
  payload = '<!DOCTYPE html ';
}

Workarounds

  • Avoid binding untrusted user input directly to [innerHTML] in server-rendered templates; use standard text interpolation ({{ userInput }}) or [textContent] when raw HTML rendering is not required.
  • Validate or sanitize user input before passing it to [innerHTML] on the server by stripping or rejecting strings matching /^<!DOCTYPE/i.

AnalysisAI

Server-side rendering in Angular (the npm package @angular/platform-server, which embeds the Domino DOM emulation parser) can be driven into an infinite synchronous loop that pins a CPU core at 100% and freezes the entire Node.js SSR process, denying service to all concurrent and subsequent requests. The trigger is a single, trivially crafted input - an incomplete DOCTYPE declaration ending in whitespace at end-of-input, such as <!DOCTYPE html - supplied wherever untrusted content reaches server-side HTML parsing, most commonly via an [innerHTML] binding. …

Unlock full vulnerability intelligence

  • Risk assessment & exploitation conditions
  • Attack chain visualization
  • Remediation with exact patch versions
  • Threat intelligence from 22 sources
  • Personal watchlist & email alerts

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata

Access
technique details hidden
Delivery
technique details hidden
Exploit
technique details hidden
Execution
technique details hidden
Impact
technique details hidden

Vulnerability AssessmentAI

Exploitation Requires an Angular Server-Side Rendering application built on @angular/platform-server (vulnerable ranges: <=19.2.25, 20.0.0-20.3.30, 21.0.0-21.2.22, 22.0.0-22.1.5) that routes untrusted, attacker-controlled input into server-side HTML parsing - specifically binding it to `[innerHTML]`, interpolating it into rendered markup, or sanitizing it on the server via Domino. … Additional conditions and limiting factors are described in the full assessment.
Risk Assessment No CVSS was supplied by the source, so all severity signals below are inferred from the description. … Full risk analysis with EPSS, KEV, and SSVC signal comparison available after sign-in.
Exploit Scenario Full exploit scenario with step-by-step reproduction available after sign-in.
Remediation Vendor-released patches are available: upgrade @angular/platform-server to 22.1.6 (from 22.0.0-22.1.5), 21.2.23 (from 21.0.0-21.2.22) or 20.3.31 (from 20.0.0-20.3.30) as appropriate for your Angular major line, as documented in GHSA-f67j-2jqw-jpq7 (https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-f67j-2jqw-jpq7). … Detailed patch versions, workarounds, and compensating controls in full report.

Recommended ActionAI

Within 24 hours, inventory all applications using @angular/platform-server versions <=19.2.25, 20.0.0-20.3.30, 21.0.0-21.2.22, and 22.0.0-22.1.5; disable server-side rendering if feasible, or apply strict input validation to reject malformed DOCTYPE declarations (e.g., incomplete DOCTYPE ending in whitespace) in any untrusted content reaching [innerHTML] bindings; deploy WAF rules to block such payloads. …

Sign in for detailed remediation steps and compensating controls.

Threat intelligence, references, and detailed analysis are available after sign-in.

CVE-2024-41713 CRITICAL POC
9.1 Oct 21

A vulnerability in the NuPoint Unified Messaging (NPM) component of Mitel MiCollab through 9.8 SP1 FP2 (9.8.1.201) could

CVE-2024-55591 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jan 14

FortiOS and FortiProxy contain an authentication bypass via the Node.js websocket module allowing unauthenticated remote

CVE-2023-44487 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 10

Denial of service against HTTP/2 server implementations allows remote unauthenticated attackers to exhaust server resour

CVE-2014-7205 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Oct 08

Eval injection vulnerability in the internals.batch function in lib/batch.js in the bassmaster plugin before 1.5.2 for t

CVE-2025-59528 CRITICAL POC
10.0 Sep 22

Flowise version 3.0.5 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the CustomMCP node. The mcpServerConfig paramete

CVE-2017-14849 HIGH POC
7.5 Sep 28

Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was inc

CVE-2017-5941 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Feb 09

An issue was discovered in the node-serialize package 0.0.4 for Node.js. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulner

CVE-2014-0224 HIGH POC
7.4 Jun 05

OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCiph

CVE-2014-3744 HIGH POC
7.5 Oct 23

Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary fi

CVE-2014-9566 HIGH POC
7.5 Mar 10

Multiple SQL injection vulnerabilities in the Manage Accounts page in the AccountManagement.asmx service in the Solarwin

CVE-2013-4660 MEDIUM POC
6.8 Jun 28

The JS-YAML module before 2.0.5 for Node.js parses input without properly considering the unsafe !!js/function tag, whic

CVE-2016-2107 MEDIUM POC
5.9 May 05

The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a

Share

CVE-2026-101895 vulnerability details – vuln.today

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy