Skip to main content

TrueConf Client CVE-2025-66835

HIGH
Uncontrolled Search Path Element (CWE-427)
2025-12-30 cve@mitre.org
7.1
CVSS 3.1 · Vendor: mitre
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Gain local low-priv access
  2. Exploit
    Plant malicious wfapi.dll in search path
  3. Execution
    TrueConf Client loads hijacked DLL
  4. Impact
    Execute arbitrary code in user context

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A08:2025 - Software or Data Integrity Failures
ASVS 5.0
V13 - Configuration Search path element control
Exploitation Conditions

Exploitation requires local access to the host and the ability to write a crafted wfapi.dll into a directory that TrueConf Client 8.5.2 includes in its DLL search order ahead of the legitimate library (per CVSS PR:L, the attacker must already hold at least low/standard-user privileges). No user interaction beyond the normal launch/loading of the TrueConf Client is needed (UI:N). Limiting factors: the attack is local-only (AV:L) and cannot be triggered over the network; it is confined to version 8.5.2; the executed code runs only in the victim user's context (S:U, no privilege escalation to SYSTEM), and success depends on the attacker having write permission to an appropriate search-path directory, which hardened ACLs would deny.

Impact

The signals are internally consistent toward a moderate, low-urgency local risk. The CVSS 3.1 vector AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N scores 7.1 (High) but explicitly requires local access and existing low privileges (PR:L), with no availability impact - this is not a remotely exploitable RCE despite the 'RCE' tag. EPSS is 0.17% (6th percentile), and the CVE is NOT in CISA KEV, so there is no evidence of active or widespread exploitation. Publicly available exploit code exists, which raises opportunistic risk, but POC availability is a distinct signal from active exploitation and should not be conflated. The most notable tension is the 'RCE' tag versus the AV:L vector: this is local arbitrary code execution, not network RCE - defenders should treat it as a local code-execution/user-context compromise primitive, useful in a post-access chain rather than as an initial remote breach. No scope change (S:U) means the code runs at the victim user's privilege level, not elevated.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker who already has a foothold as a low-privileged local user (or via social engineering that plants a file) writes a malicious wfapi.dll into a directory that TrueConf Client 8.5.2 searches before the legitimate one; when the victim launches or the client loads the library, the attacker's code executes in that user's context. Publicly available exploit code lowers the effort to weaponize this. Because the CVSS vector is AV:L/AC:L, exploitation is straightforward once local write access to a search-path directory is obtained.

This Week Schedule remediation this week. Why: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Jul 05, 2026

Local code execution in TrueConf Client 8.5.2 lets an already-authenticated local user run arbitrary code in the context of the victim user by planting a malicious wfapi.dll that the application loads insecurely (CWE-427). Publicly available exploit code exists, but there is no public exploit identified in the sense of active exploitation - it is not listed in CISA KEV and EPSS is low (0.17%, 6th percentile), indicating little observed real-world exploitation activity. The impact is confined to the current user's context (no privilege escalation to SYSTEM claimed).

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch or fixed version is identified in the available data, so an exact upgrade target cannot be cited - check TrueConf's official advisories for a build newer than 8.5.2 before deploying. As specific compensating controls: ensure the TrueConf installation directory and any directory the client uses as its working/current directory are not writable by non-administrative users (tighten NTFS ACLs so standard users cannot drop wfapi.dll there), which removes the attacker's DLL-plant location at the cost of stricter directory management; verify that a legitimate signed wfapi.dll is present in the trusted application directory so the loader resolves it before any planted copy; and apply application-allowlisting (e.g., WDAC/AppLocker DLL rules) to block unsigned or unexpected DLLs from loading, accepting the operational overhead of maintaining allowlist rules. Monitor endpoints for creation of wfapi.dll in unexpected paths. The only external reference available is the third-party PoC at https://github.com/x00nullbit/CVE-References/blob/main/CVE-2025-66835/README.md.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

TrueConf Client is a Windows desktop endpoint for the TrueConf video-conferencing/UC platform. The flaw is a classic DLL search-order/uncontrolled-search-path hijacking issue (CWE-427, Uncontrolled Search Path Element): the application resolves and loads wfapi.dll without pinning a fully-qualified trusted path, so Windows' default loader search order can be abused to load an attacker-supplied DLL from a writable directory that precedes the legitimate one. wfapi.dll appears to be a dependency the client expects at load time; because the load is unqualified, any directory the attacker controls in the search path (e.g., the application's own install/working directory or the current working directory) becomes a code-injection vector. The single affected build is identified by CPE cpe:2.3:a:trueconf:trueconf:8.5.2, i.e. version 8.5.2 specifically.

Know when Trueconf gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (mitre) PRIMARY 7.1 HIGH
AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
vuln.today AI 7.1 HIGH

Local DLL-plant requires an existing low-priv user (AV:L, PR:L); loads on normal client startup (UI:N); code runs at user context yielding high C/I but no availability impact and no scope change.

3.1 AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
4.0 AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (mitre).

CVSS VectorVendor: mitre

Attack Vector
Local
Attack Complexity
Low
Privileges Required
Low
User Interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

TrueConf Client 8.5.2 is vulnerable to DLL hijacking via crafted wfapi.dll allowing local attackers to execute arbitrary code within the user's context.

Executive ViewAI

Why It Matters

TrueConf Client 8.5.2 contains a local code execution vulnerability allowing authenticated users to run arbitrary code within their own session context through insecure DLL loading. Publicly available exploit code exists, though real-world exploitation remains minimal (0.2% observed activity rate). Risk escalates in environments where credential compromise or insider threats could leverage this to expand attacker capabilities.

Business Impact: Medium
Compensating Controls

No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis. Interim mitigations: (1) Restrict TrueConf Client to essential users; (2) Implement endpoint detection tuned for suspicious DLL loading from application directories; (3) Deploy file integrity monitoring on wfapi.dll and TrueConf application paths; (4) User training on local privilege protection and avoiding modification of application directories.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 94% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche enterprise video-conferencing client, limited deployment footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity HIGH
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Small
Automatable· derived
No
Human Impact
Medium

Priority Score

56
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +36
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Remote Code Execution represents the critical moment when an attacker successfully runs arbitrary code on a target system without physical access.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:trueconf:trueconf:8.5.2:*:*:*:*:*:*:*

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy