FortiADC
CVE-2025-59921
MEDIUM
Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessAuthenticate with low-privilege account
-
ExploitSend crafted HTTP/HTTPS request
-
ExecutionTrigger improper access check
-
ImpactReceive unauthorized sensitive data
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
OWASP Top 10:2025
A01:2025 - Broken Access Control
ASVS 5.0
V14 - Data Protection Data exposure prevention
MITRE ATT&CK
2 techniques across 2 tactics: Collection, Discovery The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Requires a valid authenticated session on the FortiADC HTTP/HTTPS interface at low privilege (PR:L) - the attacker must already possess working credentials or a compromised low-level account; it is NOT exploitable by fully unauthenticated actors. Exploitation is performed via crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests, so the appliance's web/management interface must be network-reachable to the attacker. Affected versions are FortiADC 7.4.0, 7.2.3 and below, 7.1.4 and below, all 7.0 versions, and all 6.2 versions; upgrading to a fixed release per FG-IR-23-434 removes exposure. Key limiting factor: the authentication requirement and confidentiality-only impact (no integrity or availability effect) confine this to data leakage rather than appliance takeover. |
| Impact | This is a moderate-priority issue rather than an urgent one. The CVSS 3.1 vector (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity attack requiring low-privilege authentication, with high confidentiality impact but no integrity or availability impact (C:H/I:N/A:N) - consistent with CWE-200 information disclosure. The EPSS score is low at 0.30% (21st percentile), indicating a low modeled probability of exploitation in the near term, and the CVE is NOT listed in CISA KEV, with no public exploit identified at time of analysis. These signals align rather than conflict: a low-EPSS, non-KEV, authenticated-only disclosure flaw is a genuine but non-critical risk. The main caveat is that it requires an existing authenticated foothold (PR:L) on the management/service interface, which substantially limits blast radius versus an unauthenticated RCE. No SSVC decision data was provided in the input, so automatable/exploitation-maturity cannot be assessed from a formal framework beyond the EPSS and KEV signals above. Priority: patch in normal cadence, prioritizing internet-exposed management interfaces. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker who already holds a low-privileged authenticated account on a FortiADC appliance sends specially crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests to the management or service interface and receives sensitive data back that the account should not be authorized to see. No public exploit code has been identified, and no user interaction or elevated privileges are required beyond the initial low-level authentication. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Oct 08, 2026
Sensitive data exposure in Fortinet FortiADC lets an authenticated attacker with low privileges (PR:L) pull confidential information off the appliance by sending crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests to its web/management interface. Affected releases are 7.4.0, 7.2.3 and below, 7.1.4 and below, and all 7.0 and 6.2 versions; the flaw is not reachable by a fully unauthenticated actor, since a valid low-privilege session and network access to the interface are prerequisites. Impact is confidentiality-only (C:H/I:N/A:N) with no integrity or availability effect, no publicly available exploit code has been identified at time of analysis, and EPSS is low at 0.30% (21st percentile), making this a moderate-priority information-disclosure issue rather than an urgent one.
RemediationAI
Patch status per vendor advisory: a fixed release is documented in Fortinet PSIRT advisory FG-IR-23-434 (https://fortiguard.fortinet.com/psirt/FG-IR-23-434), and upgrading to the fixed build for your branch removes exposure; consult that advisory for the exact release that supersedes 7.4.0, 7.2.3, 7.1.4, and the 7.0/6.2 lines, since no independent fix version is confirmed in the available data. Until upgrade is possible, apply these compensating controls: restrict the FortiADC web/management interface to trusted management networks via trusted-host/firewall rules and disable management access on internet-facing interfaces (trade-off: cuts off remote administration unless a VPN or jump host is used); disable plaintext HTTP management access so only HTTPS is available (trade-off: breaks any scripts or monitors hard-coded to HTTP URLs); enforce MFA and review or minimize low-privilege admin accounts and their role assignments, since PR:L is the precondition for exploitation (trade-off: additional login friction and possible workflow disruption); and audit FortiADC audit and web-access logs for anomalous or unusual crafted requests from low-privileged accounts (trade-off: only detective, not preventive, and requires log retention and alerting effort). If any low-privilege credentials are suspected of compromise, rotate them and the appliance's administrative secrets as part of the response.
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The issue is classified CWE-200 (Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor), a broad root-cause class covering failures to restrict responses, endpoints, or object references to only the data the requesting principal is authorized to see. In practice this typically manifests as over-permissive management APIs, verbose responses, or object-level authorization gaps where a low-privileged FortiADC administrator can retrieve configuration or operational data that should require higher privilege. CPE strings (cpe:2.3:a:fortinet:fortiadc with wildcards plus an explicit 7.4.0 entry) confirm the FortiADC application line as the sole affected product, across the 6.2, 7.0, 7.1, 7.2, and 7.4 branches. The assessed vector CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N indicates the attack surface is the network-exposed HTTP/HTTPS management interface, exploitation is straightforward once credentials exist, no user interaction is needed, scope is unchanged, and the single consequence is high-confidentiality data leakage within the appliance boundary. The reliance on PR:L is the key technical limiter: this is a privilege-escalation-in-information-access bug, not a pre-auth remote compromise.
Know when Fortiadc gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Network-reachable crafted HTTP(S) request with low complexity (AV:N/AC:L), requires an authenticated low-privilege account (PR:L), and leaks sensitive data only (C:H, I:N/A:N).
Primary rating from Vendor (fortinet).
CVSS VectorVendor: fortinet
DescriptionCVE.org
An exposure of sensitive information to an unauthorized actor vulnerability [CWE-200] in Fortinet FortiADC version 7.4.0, version 7.2.3 and below, version 7.1.4 and below, 7.0 all versions, 6.2 all versions may allow an authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive data via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org
An improper handling of malformed request vulnerability [CWE-228] exists in FortiADC 5.0 all versions, 6.0.0 all version
A permissive cross-domain policy with untrusted domains vulnerability in Fortinet FortiADC 7.1.0 - 7.1.1, FortiDDoS-F 6.
An improper access control vulnerability [CWE-284] in FortiADC automation feature 7.1.0 through 7.1.2, 7.0 all versions,
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Fortinet FortiA
Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerabilities [CWE-89] i
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability [CWE-78 ] in
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiADC CLI 7.1.0, 7.0.0
Multiple improper neutralization of special elements used in an os command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerabilties [CWE-
An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command vulnerability [CWE-78] in FortiADC 7.2.0, 7.1.0 thr
A format string vulnerability [CWE-134] in the command line interpreter of FortiADC version 6.0.0 through 6.0.4, FortiAD
FortiADC versions 6.1 through 7.6.1 contain an OS command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) that allows authenticated att
A relative path traversal [CWE-23] in Fortinet FortiADC version 7.2.0 and before 7.1.1 allows a privileged attacker to d
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
GitHub PoC
Exploit-DB