Severity by source
AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Primary rating from NVD.
CVSS VectorNVD
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Lifecycle Timeline
4Blast Radius
ecosystem impact- 1,885 maven packages depend on org.springframework:spring-web (548 direct, 1,339 indirect)
Ecosystem-wide dependent count for version 6.2.0.
DescriptionCVE.org
Description
In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input.
Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true:
- The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition.
- The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset).
- The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input.
- The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input.
- The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details).
An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true:
- The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header.
- The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition.
- The filename is set via one of: * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String), or
- ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, ASCII)
- The filename is not derived from user-supplied input.
- The filename is derived from user-supplied input but sanitized by the application.
- The attacker cannot inject malicious content in the downloaded content of the response.
Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework:
- 6.2.0 - 6.2.7
- 6.1.0 - 6.1.20
- 6.0.5 - 6.0.28
- Older, unsupported versions are not affected
MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version.
Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.8OSS6.1.x6.1.21OSS6.0.x6.0.29 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary.
CWE-113 in Content-Disposition handling in VMware Spring Framework versions 6.0.5 to 6.2.7 allows remote attackers to launch Reflected File Download (RFD) attacks via unsanitized user input in ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset) with non-ASCII charsets.
Analysis
Description
In Spring Framework, versions 6.0.x as of 6.0.5, versions 6.1.x and 6.2.x, an application is vulnerable to a reflected file download (RFD) attack when it sets a “Content-Disposition” header with a non-ASCII charset, where the filename attribute is derived from user-supplied input.
Specifically, an application is vulnerable when all the following are true:
- The header is prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition.
- The filename is set via ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset).
- The value for the filename is derived from user-supplied input.
- The application does not sanitize the user-supplied input.
- The downloaded content of the response is injected with malicious commands by the attacker (see RFD paper reference for details).
An application is not vulnerable if any of the following is true:
- The application does not set a “Content-Disposition” response header.
- The header is not prepared with org.springframework.http.ContentDisposition.
- The filename is set via one of: * ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String), or
- ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, ASCII)
- The filename is not derived from user-supplied input.
- The filename is derived from user-supplied input but sanitized by the application.
- The attacker cannot inject malicious content in the downloaded content of the response.
Affected Spring Products and VersionsSpring Framework:
- 6.2.0 - 6.2.7
- 6.1.0 - 6.1.20
- 6.0.5 - 6.0.28
- Older, unsupported versions are not affected
MitigationUsers of affected versions should upgrade to the corresponding fixed version.
Affected version(s)Fix versionAvailability6.2.x6.2.8OSS6.1.x6.1.21OSS6.0.x6.0.29 Commercial https://enterprise.spring.io/ No further mitigation steps are necessary.
CWE-113 in Content-Disposition handling in VMware Spring Framework versions 6.0.5 to 6.2.7 allows remote attackers to launch Reflected File Download (RFD) attacks via unsanitized user input in ContentDisposition.Builder#filename(String, Charset) with non-ASCII charsets.
Technical ContextAI
This vulnerability is classified as HTTP Response Splitting (CWE-113).
RemediationAI
Monitor vendor advisories for patches. Apply mitigations such as network segmentation, access restrictions, and monitoring.
Oracle Java SE 7 Update 6 and earlier contains multiple sandbox bypass vulnerabilities via the ClassFinder and forName m
Remote code execution in IBM Sterling B2B Integrator, Sterling Integrator, and Tivoli Common Reporting allows unauthenti
Java Runtime Environment sandbox bypass via incorrect image channel verification in 2D component allows remote unauthent
Oracle Java SE JDK/JRE 7 and 6 Update 27 and earlier allows remote code execution with complete system compromise throug
JBoss Seam 2 in Red Hat JBoss EAP 4.3.0 fails to sanitize JBoss Expression Language inputs, allowing remote attackers to
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 update 4 and earlier, 6 up
Multiple vulnerabilities in Oracle Java 7 before Update 11 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by (1) using
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 2 and earlier, 6 Up
The WLS Security component in Oracle WebLogic Server 10.3.6.0, 12.1.2.0, 12.1.3.0, and 12.2.1.0 allows remote attackers
Unspecified vulnerability in the Java Runtime Environment (JRE) component in Oracle Java SE 7 Update 7 and earlier allow
Remote unauthenticated attackers can execute arbitrary code on Adobe ColdFusion servers through Java deserialization fla
The ExceptionDelegator component in Apache Struts before 2.2.3.1 interprets parameter values as OGNL expressions during
Same weakness CWE-113 – HTTP Response Splitting
View allSame technique Code Injection
View allVendor StatusVendor
Ubuntu
Priority: Medium| Release | Status | Version |
|---|---|---|
| trusty | needs-triage | - |
| xenial | needs-triage | - |
| bionic | needs-triage | - |
| focal | needs-triage | - |
| jammy | needs-triage | - |
| noble | needs-triage | - |
| upstream | not-affected | debian: Only affects 6.x |
| oracular | ignored | end of life, was needs-triage |
| plucky | ignored | end of life, was needs-triage |
| questing | needs-triage | - |
Debian
| Release | Status | Fixed Version | Urgency |
|---|---|---|---|
| bullseye | fixed | 4.3.30-1 | - |
| bookworm | fixed | 4.3.30-2 | - |
| trixie | fixed | 4.3.30-3 | - |
| forky, sid | fixed | 4.3.30-4 | - |
| (unstable) | not-affected | - | - |
Share
External POC / Exploit Code
Leaving vuln.today
EUVD-2025-18218
GHSA-6r3c-xf4w-jxjm