Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessGain local privileged access
-
ExploitIdentify vulnerable inherited base image CVE
-
ExecutionTrigger affected system library or package
-
ImpactAccess sensitive data or modify configuration within container scope
Vulnerability Assessment
| Exploitation Conditions | Local access is required - this is not a remotely exploitable vulnerability per the AV:L CVSS vector. The attacker must already hold high privileges (PR:H) on the system or container environment. User interaction (UI:R) is also required, meaning the attack cannot be automated without a cooperating user action. The exploitable condition is the presence of unpatched vulnerabilities within the container base image layers that HCL BigFix SM is built upon. Exploitation is therefore constrained to: (1) an insider or already-compromised privileged account, (2) operating locally on the host or within the container runtime, and (3) leveraging a specific vulnerability in the inherited base image - the precise CVEs of which depend on which base image version is in use. Remote, unauthenticated exploitation is not consistent with this advisory's CVSS vector. |
| Impact | The CVSS base score of 4.0 (Medium) is consistent with the vector breakdown: local attack vector (AV:L), low complexity (AC:L), high privileges required (PR:H), user interaction required (UI:R), unchanged scope (S:U), and low confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact (C:L/I:L/A:L). This combination substantially limits real-world risk - an attacker would need to already operate with high privileges on the local system and require user interaction to achieve only partial impact. No EPSS score was provided in the source data, so exploitation probability cannot be quantified. KEV status is negative (not listed), and no POC has been identified. The tag 'Information Disclosure' partially conflicts with the vector's balanced low C/I/A impact, suggesting the primary concern may lean toward confidentiality. The most realistic risk scenario is not direct exploitation of this CVE but rather lateral exposure through inherited vulnerabilities in the base image - a risk multiplier rather than a standalone critical flaw. Overall, this is a low-urgency, hygiene-class finding that warrants remediation during normal patch cycles rather than emergency response. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | A local administrator or privileged user with existing elevated access to the HCL BigFix SM environment interacts with the containerized application in a way that triggers a vulnerability inherited from the outdated base image - for example, exploiting a known CVE in a bundled system library. The attacker leverages the inherited flaw to read sensitive configuration data or make limited modifications within the container's unchanged scope. No public exploit code targeting this specific advisory has been identified at the time of analysis. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – May 20, 2026
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) ships container deployments built on outdated or insecure base images, inheriting known vulnerabilities from those upstream layers rather than introducing a discrete code-level flaw. The CVSS vector (AV:L/PR:H/UI:R) constrains real-world risk significantly: exploitation requires local access, high privileges, and user interaction, making opportunistic remote attack unlikely. The actual exploitability and impact depend entirely on which specific vulnerabilities are present in the underlying base image versions in use. No public exploit code and no CISA KEV listing exist at the time of analysis.
RemediationAI
The primary remediation is to rebuild HCL BigFix Service Management container images using current, patched base images and redeploy. HCL's advisory KB0128144 at https://support.hcl-software.com/csm?id=kb_article&sysparm_article=KB0128144 should be consulted for the specific updated image versions or patch packages provided by the vendor. No exact fix version was supplied in the available data, so the patch version cannot be independently confirmed - the advisory should be treated as the authoritative source. As a compensating control pending a formal upgrade, organizations can scan running container images with a container vulnerability scanner (e.g., Trivy, Grype, Anchore) to enumerate which specific CVEs are inherited from the outdated base layer, prioritizing remediation of those with network-exposed, unauthenticated attack vectors. Restricting privileged access to the containerized environment limits the local, high-privilege exploitation path described in the CVSS vector. Implementing a container image policy that blocks deployment of images with base layers older than a defined threshold (e.g., 90 days) reduces ongoing exposure. Note that updating base images requires rebuilding and redeploying the application, which may require coordination with change management processes.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The vulnerability class is an insecure software supply chain configuration practice where container base images - the OS or runtime layers upon which the application image is built - are pinned to outdated versions. These outdated base images may contain CVEs in system libraries (e.g., glibc, OpenSSL, curl) or package managers inherited at build time. No CWE identifier was assigned by NVD, though this pattern aligns broadly with CWE-1104 (Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components) or CWE-657 (Violation of Secure Design Principles). The affected product is HCL BigFix Service Management (SM), a containerized IT service management platform. No CPE strings were provided in the source data, so exact affected versions and container registry coordinates cannot be independently confirmed from this advisory alone.
Know when Bigfix Service Management gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Primary rating from NVD · only source for this CVE.
CVSS VectorNVD
Lifecycle Timeline
2DescriptionNVD
HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) is susceptible to a Configuration - 'Insecure Use of Base Image Version'. Using outdated or insecure base images may introduce known vulnerabilities, potentially increasing the risk of exploitation in the application environment.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.
More in Bigfix Service Management
View allSQL injection and cross-tenant data exposure flaws in HCL BigFix Service Management allow an attacker who can reach the
Broken access control in HCL BigFix Service Management lets a low-privileged authenticated user reach administrative scr
Missing X-Content-Type-Options response header in HCL BigFix Service Management (SM) leaves browsers without MIME-type s
HCL BigFix SM is affected by cryptographic weakness due to weak or outdated encryption algorithms. Rated medium severity
HCL BigFix SM is affected by a Sensitive Information Exposure vulnerability where internal connections do not use TLS en
Cross-site scripting in HCL BigFix Service Management lets an attacker who already holds a valid low-privilege account (
EUVD-2025-209905
GHSA-4m6q-wqc9-g2m5
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB