Skip to main content

PbootCMS CVE-2025-15154

MEDIUM
Use of Less Trusted Source (CWE-348)
2025-12-28 cna@vuldb.com
5.5
CVSS 4.0 · Vendor: vuldb
View

Attack ChainAIDerived

Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain

  1. Access
    Send HTTP request to PbootCMS
  2. Exploit
    Inject forged X-Forwarded-For header
  3. Execution
    get_user_ip trusts spoofed value
  4. Impact
    Spoofed IP used in access/log decision

Vulnerability Assessment

Weakness
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V6 - Authentication IP-independent access control
Exploitation Conditions

The get_user_ip() function in core/function/handle.php reads the client-supplied X-Forwarded-For HTTP header and trusts it as the source IP without validating that it came from a trusted upstream proxy. Exploitation requires no authentication, no user interaction, and no non-default configuration - any remote client can set the header. The practical impact is LIMITED by how a deployment consumes the returned IP: it is only security-relevant where PbootCMS (or surrounding logic) uses that IP for access control, rate limiting, geolocation, or audit logging; where the IP is merely displayed or unused, the effect is negligible. There is no RCE, no data read, and no service disruption.

Impact

This is a genuinely low-to-moderate risk issue that should not be over-prioritized despite the network attack vector. The CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) confirms remote, unauthenticated, low-complexity exploitation, but the impact metrics are the decisive signal: VC:N/VI:L/VA:N means only a limited integrity effect and no confidentiality or availability loss - consistent with CWE-348 (Use of Less Trusted Source), i.e. the attacker can spoof the client IP that PbootCMS derives from the X-Forwarded-For header. EPSS is low at 0.25% (15th percentile), the CVE is NOT on CISA KEV, and no active exploitation is reported; the only elevated signal is that public exploit code exists (E:P in the vector and an 'exploit' reference), so exploitation is possible but there is no evidence of real-world weaponization. The signals are internally consistent - no network-vs-local contradiction - so the correct read is a credible but low-severity IP-spoofing/log-injection weakness, not an emergency. Its real-world danger is entirely dependent on whether a given deployment uses the returned IP for a security decision (see exploitation_conditions); absent that, impact is cosmetic.

Exploit ScenarioDerived

An attacker sends an HTTP request to a PbootCMS site with a forged X-Forwarded-For header, causing get_user_ip() to return an attacker-controlled IP address. Because public exploit code is available, this can be used to spoof the logged/trusted source IP to evade IP-based restrictions, poison access logs, or bypass naive IP allow/deny or rate-limiting logic. No authentication or user interaction is required.

This Month Plan within 30 days. Why: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9).
No patch listed yet 0.2% exploitation probability (EPSS)

Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.

Alert me

AnalysisAIv1 – Oct 13, 2026

IP address spoofing in PbootCMS up to and including 3.2.12 lets remote unauthenticated attackers forge their apparent source IP by supplying an arbitrary X-Forwarded-For header, because the get_user_ip() routine in core/function/handle.php treats the client-controlled header as a trusted source. Publicly available exploit code exists and the EPSS score is low at 0.25% (15th percentile), and there is no indication of confirmed active exploitation (no CISA KEV listing). The practical impact is limited to integrity where the deployment consumes the returned IP for access control, rate limiting, geolocation, or audit logging; systems that merely display or ignore the value are effectively unaffected, and there is no code execution, data read, or service disruption.

RemediationAI

No vendor-released patch, commit, or fixed version is identified in the available data (references point only to the VulDB entries and a public exploit write-up), so defenders should treat this as an unpatched code-path weakness and apply compensating controls. The most effective mitigation is to prevent client-supplied X-Forwarded-For values from reaching get_user_ip(): configure the front-end web server or reverse proxy to overwrite the header with the true peer address, for example in nginx by combining set_real_ip_from with real_ip_header and real_ip_recursive so only trusted proxy ranges are honored, and reject or strip XFF from untrusted sources; the trade-off is that legitimate multi-hop CDN or load-balancer architectures will lose the original client address unless every trusted hop is enumerated. In application code, replace reliance on the parsed XFF value with the server-provided REMOTE_ADDR for any authorization, rate-limiting, geolocation, or audit decision, accepting that clients behind NAT or a proxy will share an address. If a deployment cannot stop trusting the header, remove or disable features that make security decisions based on get_user_ip()'s return value, and tighten monitoring around access-control or rate-limit bypasses, understanding that this reduces functionality rather than fixing the root cause. Track the VulDB entries for an eventual upstream fix and apply it as soon as a tagged release is published, since the fix will likely normalize or ignore untrusted X-Forwarded-For input.

Affects your stack

Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.

Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.

Technical ContextAI · show details

CWE-348 describes the use of a less trusted source of data, and here the affected technology is the PHP-based PbootCMS content management system. Within core/function/handle.php, the get_user_ip() function reads the X-Forwarded-For HTTP request header and returns it as the client IP without validating that the header was inserted by a trusted upstream proxy. The X-Forwarded-For header is a de facto standard for conveying the original client address through reverse proxies, CDNs, and load balancers, but it is trivially spoofable by any direct client unless the front-end is configured to strip or overwrite untrusted values. Because PbootCMS ships this helper as part of its header-handling component, any module that relies on the returned value inherits the spoofing weakness. The CPE string cpe:2.3:a:pbootcms:pbootcms:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:* covers all versions in the repository entry, with the vulnerable range bounded by the 3.2.12 release described in the disclosure.

Know when Pbootcms gets its next vulnerability

  • Watch products and get an email when something new is published
  • Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
  • Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources

No credit card · 7-day full trial

Severity by source

Vendor (vuldb) PRIMARY 5.5 MEDIUM
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P
vuln.today AI 5.3 MEDIUM

Remotely spoofable header requires no auth or interaction (AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N); only a limited integrity effect on trusted source data (I:L), with no confidentiality or availability impact.

3.1 AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
4.0 AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N

Primary rating from Vendor (vuldb).

CVSS VectorVendor: vuldb

Attack Vector
Network
Attack Complexity
Low
Attack Requirements
None
Privileges Required
None
User Interaction
None
Vulnerable system: Confidentiality
None
Vulnerable system: Integrity
Low
Vulnerable system: Availability
None
Subsequent system: Confidentiality
None
Subsequent system: Integrity
None
Subsequent system: Availability
None

DescriptionCVE.org

A security vulnerability has been detected in PbootCMS up to 3.2.12. The affected element is the function get_user_ip of the file core/function/handle.php of the component Header Handler. The manipulation of the argument X-Forwarded-For leads to use of less trusted source. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

Threat Intelligence Overview

EPSS Score
0.2%
Top 85% exploitable
Prevalence
Low
niche open-source Chinese CMS, limited enterprise footprint
Exploit
POC
Public exploit code exists
Data Quality
4 sources
Confidence: Medium

How this decision was reached

The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.

SignalValue
Severity MEDIUM
CISA KEV No
Public POC Yes
EPSS 0.2%
Patch available No
Active threat No
Deciding rule
MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9)
What every action level means
Emergency Immediate action required. Criteria: CRITICAL + in CISA KEV (actively exploited) without patch, OR CRITICAL + EPSS > 30% without patch, OR CRITICAL + active threat signals without patch.
Act Now Prioritize within 24-48h. Criteria: in KEV with patch available, OR CRITICAL + public POC, OR HIGH + EPSS > 10%, OR CRITICAL + active threat, OR any CRITICAL severity.
This Week Schedule remediation this week. Criteria: HIGH severity (CVSS 7.0-8.9). Patch within normal change window.
This Month Plan within 30 days. Criteria: MEDIUM severity (CVSS 4.0-6.9), lower exploitation probability. Include in regular patch cycle.
Monitor Track and reassess. Criteria: LOW severity (CVSS 0.1-3.9), minimal exploitation risk. No immediate action needed.

SSVC AssessmentENISA

SSVC Decision· derived
Scheduled
Exploitation· derived
Poc
System Exposure· derived
Open
Automatable· derived
Yes
Human Impact· derived
Medium

Priority Score

48
Low Medium High Critical
KEV: 0
EPSS: 0
CVSS: +28
PoC: +20
Weaponized: 0
Threat intel: 0
Gov advisory: 0

Attack Technique

Information disclosure occurs when an application unintentionally exposes sensitive data that aids attackers in reconnaissance or directly compromises security.

Affected Products (CPE)CVE.org

cpe:2.3:a:pbootcms:pbootcms:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
CVE-2023-39834 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Aug 24

PbootCMS below v3.2.0 was discovered to contain a command injection vulnerability via create_function. Rated critical se

CVE-2022-32417 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Jul 14

PbootCMS v3.1.2 was discovered to contain a remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability via the function parserIfLabel at

CVE-2018-19893 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Dec 06

SearchController.php in PbootCMS 1.2.1 has SQL injection via the index.php/Search/index.html query string. Rated critica

CVE-2018-19595 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Nov 27

PbootCMS V1.3.1 build 2018-11-14 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via use of "eval" with mixed case, as

CVE-2018-18450 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Oct 17

apps\admin\controller\content\SingleController.php in PbootCMS before V1.3.0 build 2018-11-12 has SQL Injection, as demo

CVE-2018-11369 CRITICAL POC
9.8 May 22

An issue was discovered in PbootCMS v1.0.9. Rated critical severity (CVSS 9.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitab

CVE-2018-10133 CRITICAL POC
9.8 Apr 16

PbootCMS v0.9.8 allows PHP code injection via an IF label in index.php/About/6.html or admin.php/Site/index.html, relate

CVE-2025-46109 HIGH POC
8.8 Jun 18

SQL Injection vulnerability in pbootCMS versions 3.2.5 and 3.2.10 that allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execut

CVE-2018-11018 HIGH POC
8.8 May 13

An issue was discovered in PbootCMS v1.0.7. Rated high severity (CVSS 8.8), this vulnerability is remotely exploitable,

CVE-2018-10132 HIGH POC
8.8 Apr 16

PbootCMS v0.9.8 has CSRF via an admin.php/Message/mod/id/19.html?backurl=/index.php request, resulting in PHP code injec

CVE-2018-18211 HIGH POC
8.1 Oct 10

PbootCMS 1.2.1 has SQL injection via the HTTP POST data to the api.php/cms/addform?fcode=1 URI. Rated high severity (CVS

CVE-2023-50082 HIGH POC
7.5 Jan 04

Aoyun Technology pbootcms V3.1.2 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control, allows remote attackers to gain sensitive in

This site uses cookies essential for authentication and security. No tracking or analytics cookies are used. Privacy Policy