Attack ChainAIDerived
Hypothetical attack flow derived from CVE metadata – not a confirmed exploit chain
-
AccessReach controller over EtherNet-IP
-
DeliveryCraft invalid project file
-
ExploitSend project download to controller
-
ExecutionOverflow firmware parser buffer
-
PersistController enters MNRF fault
-
ImpactProcess halts / safety function lost
Vulnerability Assessment
| Weakness |
CWE
ASVS 5.0
V15 - Secure Coding and Architecture Buffer copy size validation
MITRE ATT&CK
1 technique across 1 tactic: Execution The technique list with ATT&CK links and the kill-chain view is part of the Basic plan and up. |
| Exploitation Conditions | Exploitation requires network reachability to a CompactLogix 5370 / Compact GuardLogix 5370 / ControlLogix 5570 / GuardLogix 5570 controller and the ability to send it a project 'load'/download over its programming/EtherNet-IP interface; the trigger is specifically an invalid project file that the controller attempts to parse, causing a Major Non-Recoverable Fault (MNRF). Per the vendor CVSS 4.0 vector (PR:N/UI:N/AT:N) no authentication or user interaction is required, but exploitation is limited to environments where the controller's programming path is reachable by the attacker - in a correctly segmented ICS with the keyswitch in RUN or download access restricted, the attack surface is substantially reduced. Recovery requires manual intervention (MNRF is non-recoverable without operator action), which is the core impact rather than a precondition. |
| Impact | The Rockwell CVSS 4.0 vector (AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N) describes a network-reachable, low-complexity attack with no privileges or interaction, and impact scoped purely to availability of the controller (VA:H) and the subsequent physical process (SA:H) - there is no confidentiality or integrity impact. This is consistent with the description: the outcome is a fault/halt, not RCE or data theft. However, PR:N should be read in ICS context - exploitation still requires network reachability to the controller and the ability to send it a project download, which in a properly segmented plant should not be exposed to untrusted networks. EPSS is not provided and the CVE is not in CISA KEV, and no POC is referenced, so real-world exploitation probability is currently unquantified; the high score is driven by safety/availability consequence, not by evidence of active exploitation. Net: high-priority patch candidate for OT asset owners because of MNRF impact on safety controllers, but real exposure depends heavily on network segmentation. |
| Exploit ScenarioDerived | An attacker with network reachability to an exposed Logix controller (e.g., a flat OT network or an internet-exposed EtherNet-IP interface) sends a crafted, invalid project download to the controller. The malformed data overruns a firmware parsing buffer and drives the controller into a Major Non-Recoverable Fault, stopping the controlled process and, for GuardLogix units, dropping the safety function until an operator manually clears the fault and reloads a valid project. No public exploit code is referenced, so this would require the attacker to develop the malformed-project payload. |
Get an e-mail when this CVE is exploited, patched or re-scored. Free account.
Alert meAnalysisAIv1 – Jul 14, 2026
Remote denial-of-service in Rockwell Automation CompactLogix 5370, Compact GuardLogix 5370, ControlLogix 5570, and GuardLogix 5570 controllers allows a remote user to push a malformed project file that forces the controller into a Major Non-Recoverable Fault (MNRF), halting the controlled process until manual recovery. The CVSS 4.0 score of 9.2 reflects high availability impact on both the controller and the downstream physical process (VA:H/SA:H) with no authentication or user interaction required per the vendor vector. There is no public exploit identified at time of analysis and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV, but the loss of a safety-rated (GuardLogix) controller makes availability the dominant concern.
RemediationAI
Consult Rockwell advisory SD1781 (https://www.rockwellautomation.com/en-us/trust-center/security-advisories/advisory.SD1781.html) for the fixed firmware revisions and upgrade the affected CompactLogix/ControlLogix/GuardLogix controllers to the vendor-patched version; the exact fix version is not present in the provided data, so treat this as 'patch available per vendor advisory' and verify the target revision against SD1781 before flashing. Because firmware upgrades on safety controllers require an outage and revalidation, apply compensating controls in the interim: restrict CIP/EtherNet-IP access to the controllers so only engineering workstations on a trusted OT subnet can perform project downloads (block the controller's programming path from IT and untrusted networks via firewall/ACL and CIP Security where supported), set the controller keyswitch to RUN to block remote mode changes and downloads where the process allows, and monitor for unexpected project download or connection attempts. Trade-off: keyswitch-in-RUN and download restrictions will block legitimate remote programming and require physical/on-site access for engineering changes.
Affected VersionsENISA
Affects your stack
Find out whether the stacks and servers you run are on an affected version.
Checking this CVE against your own stacks and servers is part of the Basic plan and up.
Technical ContextAI · show details
The affected devices are Allen-Bradley Logix-family programmable automation controllers (PACs) used in industrial control and safety instrumented systems; the GuardLogix variants are SIL-rated safety controllers. The CPE (cpe:2.3:a:rockwell_automation:...compactlogix®_5370...guardlogix®_5570) confirms the CompactLogix 5370, Compact GuardLogix 5370, ControlLogix 5570, and GuardLogix 5570 lines. The vendor-supplied tag and CWE-120 (Classic Buffer Overflow / buffer copy without checking input size) indicate that parsing of an untrusted or malformed 'project' download overruns a fixed-size buffer in the controller firmware, corrupting execution state and triggering the controller's fail-safe MNRF condition rather than achieving code execution.
Know when Compactlogix 5370 Compact Guardlogix 5370 Controllogix 5570 Guardlogix 5570 gets its next vulnerability
- Watch products and get an email when something new is published
- Check this CVE against your own stack and servers
- Exploit and PoC references, threat intelligence from 22 sources
No credit card · 7-day full trial
Severity by source
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H
Network-reachable, low-complexity, no auth/interaction per vendor; availability-only impact with scope change since the controller fault propagates to the controlled physical process.
Primary rating from Vendor (Rockwell).
CVSS VectorVendor: Rockwell
DescriptionCVE.org
A denial-of-service issue exists in 5370/5570 controllers. This vulnerability could potentially allow a remote user to load an invalid project, causing the device to enter a major non-recoverable fault (MNRF).
Executive ViewAI
Rockwell Automation CompactLogix, ControlLogix, and GuardLogix controllers (5370/5570 series) are vulnerable to remote denial-of-service attacks via malformed project files that force unrecoverable faults, halting manufacturing and safety-critical processes. This CVSS 9.2 vulnerability requires no authentication and lacks a vendor patch, creating immediate production and safety exposure for all organizations using these controllers.
Network isolation of affected controllers; disable remote project deployment if operationally permissible; enforce role-based access controls in Studio 5000 to limit who can deploy projects; deploy network-level intrusion detection tuned for malformed project file submissions; maintain redundant/parallel safety controllers as live failover; establish 24/7 on-site technical support trained in manual controller recovery; implement continuous monitoring and alerting for controller fault states until vendor patch availability.
Threat Intelligence Overview
How this decision was reached
The engine reads each signal below and applies a fixed list of rules from top to bottom. The first rule that matches sets the recommended action – like a statement, every line is shown.
What every action level means
SSVC AssessmentENISA
Priority Score
Attack Technique
A buffer overflow occurs when a program writes more data to a memory buffer than it was allocated to hold, causing the excess data to spill into adjacent memory regions.
EUVD-2025-210461
GHSA-m6r3-j7p8-mpv6
NVD
CVE.org
EPSS
Vulnrichment
VulDB
Exploit-DB