Integer overflow in NewNTUnicodeString within the Go extended syscall package for Windows allows a local low-privileged attacker to silently inject a truncated NTUnicodeString into applications that expect validation failures on oversized input. Affected is golang.org/x/sys/windows before version 0.44.0. Because the function returns a truncated result rather than an error, consuming code may proceed with a malformed string, potentially bypassing length-based security checks or causing downstream logic errors - no public exploit has been identified at time of analysis and EPSS exploitation probability is 0.02%.
Unverified password change in Devolutions Server allows a low-privileged authenticated attacker to reset any user's account password by submitting a crafted request that omits or bypasses the current-password verification step. Affected are all releases up to and including 2025.3.20.0 and a specific 2026.1.x branch window (2026.1.6.0 through 2026.1.16.0), meaning the flaw spans both legacy and recent deployments of this enterprise PAM platform. No public exploit or active exploitation has been identified; EPSS stands at 0.03% (8th percentile) and SSVC exploitation status is confirmed as none, but the sensitivity of a PAM system as the target elevates real-world risk beyond the raw CVSS 3.1 score of 3.1.
Cross-typebot result data leakage in Typebot versions 3.15.2 and prior allows an authenticated user to read session variables, prior answers, and PII from a different typebot by supplying a foreign resultId to the startChat endpoint. The bot engine's findResult query omits typebotId from its database filter (CWE-639 IDOR), so any valid result record is returned regardless of which typebot owns it. If the attacker possesses a valid CUID2 resultId from another typebot and that typebot has rememberUser enabled, they can read the original user's names, emails, phone numbers, and other session variables exposed through matching variable names. No public exploit has been identified at time of analysis; vendor-released patch is available in version 3.16.0.
Sealed-entry audit bypass in Devolutions Server allows an authenticated high-privileged user to silently retrieve sensitive data from protected vault entries without generating the expected unseal audit notification, undermining privileged access oversight controls. Affected versions span all releases through 2025.3.20.0 and the 2026.1.6.0 to 2026.1.16.0 range. No public exploit code exists and this vulnerability is not listed in the CISA KEV catalog, but the compliance and insider-threat implications are significant in PAM environments where sealed-entry audit trails are the primary detection mechanism for sensitive credential access.
Cross-vault authorization bypass in Devolutions Server's entry duplication feature permits an authenticated low-privilege user to exfiltrate documentation and attachments from vaults they cannot access by submitting a crafted save request with a foreign entry identifier. Two distinct version ranges are affected: all releases at or before 2025.3.20.0 and the 2026.1.6.0-2026.1.16.0 branch. EPSS stands at 0.03% (7th percentile), SSVC confirms no known exploitation, and no public exploit code has been identified, making this a low-urgency but meaningful finding for organizations relying on strict vault segregation within their PAM environment.
Devolutions Server's entry export feature silently bypasses the unseal notification workflow when an authenticated, export-privileged user submits a crafted export request against a sealed entry. Sealed entries in Devolutions Server carry an explicit administrative oversight guarantee - unseal events trigger notifications to administrators - making this a control bypass against a core PAM audit promise rather than a direct credential theft. Affected versions span 2025.3.20.0 and earlier as well as 2026.1.6.0 through 2026.1.16.0; no public exploit exists and EPSS sits at 0.03% (8th percentile), reflecting no observed attacker interest at time of analysis.
Cleartext TCP transmission in STER (by Poland's Central Institute for Labour Protection, CIOP) exposes sensitive data including passwords, personal data, and authentication tokens to interception. All versions prior to 9.5 are affected per EUVD-2026-31424. Exploitation requires the attacker to be pre-positioned on the network path (CVSS AT:P), limiting opportunistic mass exploitation, but poses meaningful risk in shared or corporate network environments where insider or adjacent-network threats exist. No public exploit code identified at time of analysis and no confirmed active exploitation (CISA KEV).
Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and earlier exposes an IDOR combined with an incorrect authorization level check in the Express association Reorder dialog, enabling authenticated users with only view-only permission to tamper with entity ordering state for entries they do not own. The flaw is limited to sites actively using the Concrete CMS Express application-builder feature with entity ordering configured - a non-default deployment subset. No public exploit or active exploitation has been identified; all available signals (CVSS 4.0 of 2.3, EPSS at 0.04%, SSVC exploitation: none) consistently characterize this as a low-priority, narrow-impact finding.
CSRF in Concrete CMS 9.5.0 and below enables a network-based attacker to trick an authenticated backend editor into silently approving an unintended file version via the Backend\File::approveVersion endpoint, effectively downgrading a published file or activating an unpublished co-editor version without the victim's knowledge. Exploitation is constrained to users holding the edit_file_contents permission who can be socially engineered into visiting an attacker-controlled page while logged in. No public exploit code exists and no active exploitation has been identified; EPSS at 0.02% and SSVC Exploitation:none confirm minimal real-world urgency. Vendor patch available in version 9.5.1.
Stored XSS in Concrete CMS 9.0 through 9.5.0 enables a rogue editor to inject persistent JavaScript via the page name field within the Atomik theme, executing in the browser session of any authenticated user who visits the affected pages. Consequences include session hijacking, credential theft, and unauthorized actions performed as the victim - potentially escalating to higher privileges if an administrator is targeted. No active exploitation is confirmed (SSVC: none; EPSS 0.04% at the 13th percentile), and a vendor-released patch is available in version 9.5.1.