CVE-2024-51982 is a denial-of-service vulnerability affecting network-connected printers and multifunction devices that expose the Printer Job Language (PJL) interface on TCP port 9100. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send a malformed PJL command with an invalid FORMLINES variable to crash the device repeatedly, causing service disruption without authentication or user interaction. The CVSS 7.5 score reflects the high availability impact, and while specific KEV/POC data was not provided in the source material, the straightforward nature of the exploit (malformed input causing crash) suggests practical exploitability.
CVE-2025-0966 is a SQL injection vulnerability in IBM InfoSphere Information Server 11.7 that allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands against the backend database. An attacker with valid credentials can view, add, modify, or delete sensitive information without administrative privileges. The vulnerability carries a CVSS score of 7.6 (High) and requires low attack complexity, making it a significant risk for organizations using affected versions.
CVE-2025-6678 is an unauthenticated remote information disclosure vulnerability in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial charging stations affecting the Pile API endpoint. An attacker can remotely access sensitive information including credentials without requiring authentication, enabling credential theft and potential further compromise of the charging infrastructure. The vulnerability has a CVSS 7.5 severity rating reflecting high confidentiality impact, and the lack of authentication requirements makes exploitation trivial.
Discourse versions prior to 3.4.6 (stable) and 3.5.0.beta8-dev (tests-passed) contain an information disclosure vulnerability where users retain visibility of their own whisper-typed posts even after losing group membership that should restrict access to whispers. This is a logic flaw in the whisper visibility enforcement mechanism (CWE-200: Information Exposure) affecting unauthenticated network access with high confidentiality impact. No public exploitation has been reported, but the issue is easily discoverable through normal platform usage.
CVE-2025-5825 is a firmware downgrade remote code execution vulnerability in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial charging stations that allows network-adjacent attackers with Bluetooth pairing capability to execute arbitrary code by uploading a malicious firmware image without proper validation. The vulnerability has a CVSS score of 7.5 (High) with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact, though exploitation requires prior Bluetooth device pairing. This is a ZDI-coordinated disclosure (ZDI-CAN-26354) affecting commercial charging infrastructure.
OpenBao versions before 2.3.0 contain an unauthenticated denial-of-service vulnerability in the root rekey and recovery rekey endpoints that allows attackers to cancel critical key management operations without authentication or audit logging. This affects organizations using OpenBao for secrets management, and the high CVSS 7.5 score reflects the availability impact, though the vulnerability requires no special privileges or user interaction to exploit.
CVE-2025-5824 is an authentication bypass vulnerability in Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial that allows network-adjacent attackers to bypass authentication through insufficient origin validation in Bluetooth pairing requests. The vulnerability (formerly ZDI-CAN-26353) has a CVSS score of 7.5 with high confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact; exploitation requires prior ability to pair a malicious Bluetooth device with the target system. No KEV or active exploitation data was provided in the supplied intelligence, and patch availability status is not documented in the available information.
Cyberduck and Mountain Duck improperly implement TLS certificate pinning by storing certificate fingerprints using the cryptographically weak SHA-1 algorithm instead of modern alternatives like SHA-256. This allows attackers to potentially forge or spoof self-signed certificates and perform man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks against users of affected versions. The vulnerability affects Cyberduck through version 9.1.6 and Mountain Duck through version 4.17.5; while no public POC or active KEV exploitation is currently documented, the CVSS 7.4 rating reflects high confidentiality and integrity impact.
CVE-2024-51979 is a stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability affecting authenticated users of printing and web services that process malformed HTTP/HTTPS requests with oversized Referer headers. An authenticated attacker with high privileges can exploit this flaw by sending a specially crafted request containing an empty Origin header and a Referer header with a host value exceeding 64 bytes, potentially achieving remote code execution or denial of service. The vulnerability affects services on TCP ports 80 (HTTP), 443 (HTTPS), and 631 (IPP/printing protocol), with a CVSS 7.2 score indicating high severity, though exploitation requires prior authentication.
CVE-2025-6443 is an unauthenticated remote access control bypass vulnerability in Mikrotik RouterOS affecting VXLAN traffic handling. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to bypass ingress filtering and gain unauthorized access to internal network resources by exploiting improper validation of remote IP addresses in VXLAN packets. With a CVSS score of 7.2 (Network-based, Low complexity, No privileges required) and unauthenticated exploitation capability, this vulnerability presents a significant risk to exposed RouterOS deployments, particularly those utilizing VXLAN for network segmentation.
CVE-2023-44915 is a reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in c3crm's /Login.php component affecting versions up to v3.0.4, where the login_error parameter fails to properly sanitize user input. An attacker can inject malicious JavaScript that executes in victims' browsers when they click a crafted login link, potentially stealing session cookies, credentials, or performing unauthorized actions on behalf of authenticated users. With a CVSS score of 7.1 and network-based attack vector requiring only user interaction, this represents a moderate-to-high severity issue for organizations using vulnerable c3crm deployments.
A SQL injection vulnerability in Student Record system Using PHP and MySQL v (CVSS 7.1) that allows a remote attacker. High severity vulnerability requiring prompt remediation.
A remote code execution vulnerability (CVSS 6.8). Remediation should follow standard vulnerability management procedures.
Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial autocharge Stack-based Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial EV chargers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of JSON messages. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length stack-based buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-26330.
Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial wLength Buffer Overflow Remote Code Execution Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial EV chargers. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the handling of USB frame packets. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of the length of user-supplied data prior to copying it to a fixed-length buffer. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-26328.
Pioneer DMH-WT7600NEX Software Update Signing Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected installations of Pioneer DMH-WT7600NEX devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the software update verification process. The issue results from the lack of validating all the data in the software update. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the device. Was ZDI-CAN-26079.
Pioneer DMH-WT7600NEX Root Filesystem Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows physically present attackers to bypass authentication on affected installations of Pioneer DMH-WT7600NEX devices. Authentication is not required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the configuration of the operating system. The issue results from the lack of properly configured protection for the root file system. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to bypass authentication on the system. Was ZDI-CAN-26077.
GitForge.jl is a unified interface for interacting with Git "forges." Versions prior to 5.9.1 lack input validation of input validation for user-provided values in certain functions. In the `GitHub.repo()` function, the user can provide any string for the `repo_name` field. These inputs are not validated or safely encoded and are sent directly to the server. This means a user can add path traversal patterns like `../` in the input to access any other endpoints on `api.github.com` that were not intended. Users should upgrade immediately to v5.9.1 or later to receive a patch. All prior versions are vulnerable. No known workarounds are available.
GitForge.jl is a unified interface for interacting with Git "forges." Versions prior to 0.4.3 lack input validation for user provided values in certain functions. In the `GitForge.get_repo` function for GitHub, the user can provide any string for the owner and repo fields. These inputs are not validated or safely encoded and are sent directly to the server. This means a user can add path traversal patterns like `../` in the input to access any other endpoints on api.github.com that were not intended. Version 0.4.3 contains a patch for the issue. No known workarounds are available.
OS command injection in TOTOLINK CA300-PoE firmware 6.2c.884 allows remote attackers with low privileges to execute arbitrary commands on the device via the QuickSetting function. Exploit code is publicly available, increasing the risk of targeted attacks; no active exploitation has been confirmed by CISA KEV, though EPSS suggests moderate exploit probability (2.45%).
Remote OS command injection in TOTOLINK CA300-PoE firmware 6.2c.884 allows low-privileged authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the router's operating system via the FileName parameter of the setUpgradeUboot function in upgrade.so. Publicly available exploit code exists, and the EPSS score (2.45%, 85th percentile) indicates a moderate likelihood of exploitation in the wild, though no active exploitation has been confirmed.
OS command injection in TOTOLINK CA300-PoE firmware 6.2c.884 allows authenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary OS commands via the FileName parameter in the firmware upgrade function. Public exploit code is available, though active exploitation has not been confirmed. EPSS indicates a moderate exploitation probability (2.45%).
OS command injection in TOTOLINK CA300-PoE firmware version 6.2c.884 allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary operating system commands via the PIN parameter in the SetWLanApcliSettings API. Public exploit code is available, and EPSS indicates a moderate exploitation probability (2.45%).
Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial Serial Number Exposed Dangerous Method Information Disclosure Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to disclose sensitive information on affected installations of Autel MaxiCharger AC Wallbox Commercial EV chargers. Authentication is required to exploit this vulnerability. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the Autel Technician API. The issue results from an exposed dangerous method. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to disclose credentials, leading to further compromise. Was ZDI-CAN-26351.
CVAT is an open source interactive video and image annotation tool for computer vision. Versions 2.2.0 through 2.39.0 have no validation during the import process of a project or task backup to check that the filename specified in the query parameter refers to a TUS-uploaded file belonging to the same user. As a result, if an attacker with a CVAT account and a `user` role knows the filenames of other users' uploads, they could potentially access and steal data by creating projects or tasks using those files. This issue does not affect annotation or dataset TUS uploads, since in this case object-specific temporary directories are used. Users should upgrade to CVAT 2.40.0 or a later version to receive a patch. No known workarounds are available.
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to bypass the authorization mechanisms for specific administrative functions. This vulnerability is due to insufficient authorization enforcement mechanisms for users created by SAML SSO integration with an external identity provider. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by submitting a series of specific commands to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to modify a limited number of system settings, including some that would result in a system restart. In single-node Cisco ISE deployments, devices that are not authenticated to the network will not be able to authenticate until the Cisco ISE system comes back online.
The SiteOrigin Widgets Bundle plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `data-url` DOM Element Attribute in all versions up to, and including, 1.68.4 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
CVE-2025-5826 is a security vulnerability (CVSS 6.3) that allows network-adjacent attackers. Remediation should follow standard vulnerability management procedures.
Unrestricted file upload in code-projects Car Rental System 1.0 allows remote attackers to upload arbitrary files via the image parameter in /admin/add_cars.php. A publicly available exploit exists, potentially leading to remote code execution, though exploitation requires low-privileged access to the admin panel. The vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, and EPSS predicts low exploitation probability (0.09%).
Cross-site request forgery in Patient Record Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized actions by tricking an authenticated user into clicking a malicious link. A publicly available proof-of-concept exists, but no active exploitation has been confirmed. The EPSS score of 0.07% indicates a very low probability of widespread exploitation.
SQL injection in Best Salon Management System 1.0 allows remote authenticated attackers to query the application database via the fromdate and todate parameters in /panel/bwdates-reports-details.php. The vulnerability has a low CVSS 4.0 base score (impacts limited to low confidentiality, integrity, availability), with a 0.06% EPSS and no known in-the-wild exploitation despite a publicly disclosed exploit.
SQL injection in SourceCodester Best Salon Management System 1.0 allows authenticated remote attackers to manipulate database queries via the 'editid' parameter in the '/panel/edit-services.php' endpoint. Exploit code is publicly available, though the EPSS score (0.06%) indicates a low probability of exploitation in the wild.
SQL injection in Best Salon Management System 1.0 allows remote authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary SQL commands via the ID parameter of /panel/stock.php. Exploit code is publicly available, though no active exploitation has been confirmed.
SQL injection in SourceCodester Best Salon Management System 1.0 allows authenticated attackers to manipulate database queries via the Type parameter in /panel/add-services.php. Publicly available exploit code exists, but no active exploitation has been confirmed through CISA KEV. The EPSS score of 0.06% suggests a low probability of widespread exploitation.
We are tasked with producing a comprehensive analysis JSON object. Let's extract data from the input. CVE: CVE-2025-6605 Description: A vulnerability classified as critical was found in SourceCodester Best Salon Management System 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /panel/edit-staff.php. The manipulation of the argument editid leads to sql injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. CVSS Score: 2.1 (given; but note the vector is 4.0 and score 2.1 is low; possibly the base score of a 4.0 vector: AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N -> that gives a score around 2.0-2.3? Let's check CVSS 4.0 calculator: AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N = base score 2.1 (low). So CVSS 4.0 score 2.1 low severity. The description says "classified as critical" but CVSS base score is low. This might be a discrepancy: the vulnerability is SQL injection but the impact is limited (low integrity, low confidentiality, low availability) likely because of the privileges required (PR:L) and the impact being limited to the application. We'll note that. CWE: CWE-74 (Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection')). That's a broad category, but SQL injection is CWE-89, so CWE-74 is a parent. So we'll mention it. EPSS: 0.06%, 18th percentile (low likelihood of widespread exploitation) POC/Exploit: Publicly available (the references include a GitHub link) KEV: Not mentioned, so not in KEV. So "no public exploit identified at time of analysis" is wrong; there is public exploit. So we'll use "publicly available exploit code exists" (since POC exists). KEV not present so not actively exploited by that metric. Tags: PHP, SQLi CPE: cpe:2.3:a:mayurik:best_salon_management_system:1.0:*:*:*:*:*:*:* — that's the affected product. So product name: "Best Salon Management System" (by Mayurik). But the description says SourceCodester Best Salon Management System. Probably SourceCodester is the source, vendor Mayurik? We'll use "Best Salon Management System" as product name. Now, for each field: product_name: "Best Salon Management System" (1-3 words). So "Best Salon Management System" fits. summary: Need a synthesis. Impact: SQL injection via editid parameter in /panel/edit-staff.php. Remote attack, but requires privileges (PR:L from CVSS, so authenticated? CVSS vector says PR:L, so low privilege, likely a logged-in user). The EPSS is low, but exploit code exists. CVSS base score low (2.1). So summary: "SQL injection in SourceCodester Best Salon Management System 1.0 allows remote authenticated users to inject SQL via the editid parameter in /panel/edit-staff.php. Exploit code is publicly available, but EPSS exploitation probability is low (0.06%). No active exploitation reported (not in KEV)." technical_context: Explain technology: PHP application, SQL injection. The CWE is CWE-74 (Injection). The specific file /panel/edit-staff.php is part of staff editing functionality. The root cause: improper validation/sanitization of the editid parameter, which is directly used in SQL query. The CPE confirms the specific product and version. So mention PHP and SQLi. risk_assessment: CVSS 4.0: AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N — remote network attack, low attack complexity, no user interaction, low privilege required, low impact on confidentiality, integrity, availability, no scope change. Score 2.1 (Low). But the description says "critical" which is inconsistent; we must highlight that CVSS base score is actually low. EPSS 0.06% (low). POC exists but not known to be actively exploited. So risk is low: low privilege required and limited impact, combined with low EPSS, suggest this is a low-priority issue despite the "critical" classification in the description. Also note: the CVSS vector shows PR:L, so authentication needed, limiting attack surface. affected_products: Product: SourceCodester Best Salon Management System version 1.0. CPE: cpe:2.3:a:mayurik:best_salon_management_system:1.0. Advisory references from VulDB. So write: "SourceCodester Best Salon Management System version 1.0 is affected. The vulnerability is in the /panel/edit-staff.php file. Vendor advisory is available at VulDB (https://vuldb.com/?id.313822) and a PoC exploit is hosted on GitHub (https://github.com/Colorado-all/cve/blob/main/Best%20salon%20management%20system/SQL-6.md)." remediation: No patch explicitly mentioned. We need to check input: the description does not mention a fix version, and the references include VulDB entries that might have patch info, but input does not mention a patch. The patch field is not provided, so we must state "No vendor-released patch identified at time of analysis." But we can suggest mitigating controls: restrict access to /panel/edit-staff.php to trusted users, implement input validation/sanitization for the editid parameter, use parameterized queries. Since the vulnerability requires authentication, ensure strong password policies and limit access to admin panel. Note trade-offs. So we'll write: "No official patch is available from the vendor at the time of analysis. As a workaround, restrict access to the administrative panel (/panel/) to trusted IP addresses and require strong authentication. Implement input validation and parameterized queries to prevent SQL injection in the editid parameter. Alternatively, consider disabling the vulnerable functionality if possible, though this may break staff editing features." Specific, actionable. exploit_scenario: "An authenticated low-privileged user sends a crafted editid parameter in a request to /panel/edit-staff.php to inject SQL commands, potentially extracting database contents or altering records." (Since the CVSS impact: low on all three, so not full database compromise, but still data exposure and manipulation). Since exploit is public, an attacker could use the PoC. exploitation_conditions: Conditions: attacker must be authenticated (low privilege), as indicated by CVSS PR:L. No specific non-default configuration required beyond the application being deployed. So we state: "Low-privileged authenticated access to the application's administrative panel is required; no other special conditions are needed beyond default installation." Not just "network access required" generic. We add: "The vulnerability is in /panel/edit-staff.php, so the attacker must have a valid user account with privilege to edit staff (or at least access the panel)." So exact feature: staff editing functionality. That's a concrete condition. attack_chain: Will use 4-step? Steps: Access authenticated session → Send crafted editid parameter → SQL injection executes → Data leakage/manipulation. So: "Authenticate to Best Salon Management System panel → Send crafted HTTP request to /panel/edit-staff.php with malicious editid parameter → SQL injection executes against backend database → Extract or modify database records." With limited impact, so no code execution. confidence_notes: "Exploit code is publicly available, confirmed by GitHub repository. No vendor patch identified; affected product versions confirmed via CPE. EPSS and CVSS derived from VulDB; CVSS 4.0 score is low despite 'critical' classification in description, likely due to the low privileges and limited impact." Also, CWE-74 is broad; the underlying issue is SQL injection. The data from VulDB is the primary source; no NVD analysis yet (just references). So note that. prevalence: "low" – Best Salon Management System is a niche product for salon management, likely small business usage, not ubiquitous. So prevalence: low. prevalence_basis: "niche salon management system, limited enterprise deployment" (less than 12 words). So "low deployment footprint for a specialized salon management application." assessed_cvss_vector: Our independent assessment? Based on description and CVSS 4.0 vector given, it's already a 4.0 vector. We need to provide CVSS 3.1 vector equivalent. We'll convert the 4.0 vector to 3.1 as best we can: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L. That matches 3.1 base score: (AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L) = 6.5 (Medium). Wait, that would be 6.5, not 2.1. The given CVSS 4.0 vector has low impact on VC/VI/VA, which in 4.0 yields low severity because the impact metrics are weighted differently. In 3.1, L/L/L for C/I/A gives 0.22 impact sub-score and 6.5 base. But our vector must be consistent with the actual severity. According to the CVSS 4.0 specification, a vector with AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N yields a score of 2.1 (Low). If we translate that to 3.1, it would be AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L = 6.5, which is Medium. This suggests the 4.0 vector "downgrades" because impact is low? Wait, in 3.1, L/L/L for a low-privilege attack is Medium, not Low. The CVSS 4.0 introduces new severity levels; low score 2.1 might be "Low" in 4.0, but in 3.1 it would be "Medium". So to be independent, we can provide a 3.1 vector that reflects the actual technical risk. But we are asked to provide an independent assessment, grounded in description. I'll assess: The vulnerability is SQL injection, remote, authenticated (low privilege), no user interaction, scope unchanged, impact likely low on confidentiality, integrity, availability? For SQL injection, usually you can extract data, modify data, and possibly cause denial by dropping tables. So impact could be high, but from CVSS it's limited to low maybe because the vulnerable parameter only affects a specific table and the user has low privileges? The description doesn't specify. Given the public exploit likely shows limited injection, but a skilled attacker could escalate. To be cautious, I'd set C:L/I:L/A:L if authentication is needed. So my independent 3.1 vector: AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L (score 6.5). I'll provide that with rationale: "Requires low-privilege authentication, no user interaction, and limited data exposure in default configuration; however, SQL injection can potentially escalate impact." But I'll note that the given CVSS 4.0 vector shows low impact, and I'll reflect that. Actually, the input includes a CVSS vector already, so I could just use that 4.0 vector for assessed_cvss40_vector, but the instruction says "Your OWN independent CVSS 3.1 base-metric vector for THIS vulnerability, grounded in the description and exploitation conditions — NOT a copy of any score in the input." So I'll create my own 3.1, and also a 4.0 that's consistent with my 3.1. Since the input's 4.0 has low impact and low score, my independent assessment might produce a higher impact (e.g., C:H/I:H/A:H) for SQLi, but I need to be grounded in description: The description says it leads to SQL injection, but the CVSS 4.0 given says low impact on all three. Why? Possibly because the attacker is only low privilege and the database user might also have limited permissions, or the injection point is such that only simple injection possible? The description doesn't elaborate. However, typical SQL injection can lead to full database compromise. But the authoritative source is the VulDB entry which assigned low impact. It's risky to overrule that without further data. I'll stick to a moderate approach: I'll assign C:L/I:L/A:L, acknowledging that higher impact might be possible but not confirmed. So rationale: "Authenticated SQL injection with limited impact likely due to restricted database permissions, but could potentially be escalated." So 3.1 vector: CVSS:3.1
SQL injection in Best Salon Management System 1.0 through the Name parameter in /panel/add-staff.php allows authenticated remote attackers to read, modify, or delete database contents. Publicly available exploit code exists, but the low EPSS score (0.06%) and low CVSS impact suggest limited real-world exploitation risk.
SQL injection in Best Salon Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers with low privileges to manipulate database queries via the viewid parameter in /view-appointment.php. A public proof-of-concept exploit exists but active exploitation is not confirmed. The flaw can lead to unauthorized data access or modification.
SQL injection in SourceCodester Best Salon Management System 1.0 allows remote authenticated attackers to manipulate the editid parameter in /edit-customer-detailed.php, potentially leading to unauthorized data access or modification. A publicly available proof-of-concept exploit exists, but no active exploitation has been confirmed.
SQL injection in itsourcecode Employee Management System 1.0 allows remote attackers to manipulate SQL queries via the FirstName parameter in /admin/editempprofile.php. Exploit code is publicly available, though no active exploitation has been confirmed (EPSS 0.06%). The vulnerability requires admin authentication and can lead to unauthorized data access or modification.
Cross-site scripting in PHPGurukul Hospital Management System 4.0 allows authenticated attackers to inject malicious scripts via the Name parameter in /doctor/manage-patient.php. Successful exploitation modifies user-facing content with no confidentiality or availability impact. A public Proof of Concept exists, but EPSS is very low (0.05%) and the vulnerability is not listed in CISA KEV, indicating limited real-world exploitation likelihood.
Ruby WEBrick read_header HTTP Request Smuggling Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to smuggle arbitrary HTTP requests on affected installations of Ruby WEBrick. This issue is exploitable when the product is deployed behind an HTTP proxy that fulfills specific conditions. The specific flaw exists within the read_headers method. The issue results from the inconsistent parsing of terminators of HTTP headers. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to smuggle arbitrary HTTP requests. Was ZDI-CAN-21876.
ServiceStack GetErrorResponse Improper Input Validation NTLM Relay Vulnerability. This vulnerability allows remote attackers to relay NTLM credentials on affected installations of ServiceStack. Interaction with this library is required to exploit this vulnerability but attack vectors may vary depending on the implementation. The specific flaw exists within the implementation of the GetErrorResponse method. The issue results from the lack of proper validation of user-supplied data, which can result in a type confusion condition. An attacker can leverage this vulnerability to relay NTLM credentials in the context of the current user. Was ZDI-CAN-25834.
A local, low-privileged attacker can learn the password of the connected controller in PLC Designer V4 due to an incorrect implementation that results in the password being displayed in plain text under special conditions.
An unauthenticated attacker may perform a blind server side request forgery (SSRF), due to a CLRF injection issue that can be leveraged to perform HTTP request smuggling. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing feature used during a WS-Eventing subscription SOAP operation. The attacker can control all the HTTP data sent in the SSRF connection, but the attacker can not receive any data back from this connection.
An unauthenticated attacker may perform a limited server side request forgery (SSRF), forcing the target device to open a TCP connection to an arbitrary port number on an arbitrary IP address. This SSRF leverages the WS-Addressing ReplyTo element in a Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) SOAP request. The attacker can not control the data sent in the SSRF connection, nor can the attacker receive any data back. This SSRF is suitable for TCP port scanning of an internal network when the Web service (HTTP TCP port 80) is exposed across a network segment.
A remote code execution vulnerability in Kanboard (CVSS 5.3). Remediation should follow standard vulnerability management procedures. Vendor patch is available.
A vulnerability was found in coldfunction qCUDA up to db0085400c2f2011eed46fbc04fdc0873141688e. It has been rated as problematic. Affected by this issue is the function qcow_make_empty of the file qCUDA/qcu-device/block/qcow.c. The manipulation of the argument s->l1_size leads to integer overflow. The attack needs to be approached locally. This product is using a rolling release to provide continious delivery. Therefore, no version details for affected nor updated releases are available.
Hexagon HxGN OnCall Dispatch Advantage (Web) v10.2309.03.00264 and Hexagon HxGN OnCall Dispatch Advantage (Mobile) v10.2402 are vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) which allows a remote authenticated attacker with access to the Broadcast (Person) functionality to execute arbitrary code.
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. An attacker could use a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.8.99.1749830289 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to version 16.9-1 to trick victims into changing the canned responses. Tuleap Community Edition 16.8.99.1749830289 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.9-1 contain a patch for the issue.
Tuleap is an Open Source Suite to improve management of software developments and collaboration. An attacker could use a vulnerability present in Tuleap Community Edition prior to version 16.8.99.1748845907 and Tuleap Enterprise Edition prior to versions 16.8-3 and 16.7-5 to trick victims into changing the canned responses. Tuleap Community Edition 16.8.99.1748845907, Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.8-3, and Tuleap Enterprise Edition 16.7-5 contain a fix for the vulnerability.