Maxicharger Single
Monthly
Physical firmware compromise in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets an attacker with hands-on access exploit exposed NXP i.MX6 hardware recovery pins to boot unsigned, attacker-controlled code into memory. Once in recovery mode the attacker can dump, modify, or replace the device firmware and extract sensitive data such as credentials, keys, or configuration. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by CyberDanube), though there is no public exploit identified as being used in active campaigns and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Physical compromise of Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations running firmware through V1.03.51 is possible via an unprotected UART interface that lets an attacker halt boot and drop into the U-Boot bootloader. From the bootloader an attacker can rewrite boot configuration or the filesystem to gain full operating-system access on the charger. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by CyberDanube), though there is no public exploit identified as being used in active attacks and the flaw requires physical access.
Remote code execution and denial of service in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations running firmware through V1.03.51 stems from a heap-based buffer overflow in the set_ap_param command exposed by the /localcfg endpoint. An authenticated attacker who can reach the device's local configuration interface can send oversized input to crash the charger or potentially execute arbitrary code on it. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by CyberDanube), and the CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.4, though there is no evidence of active exploitation in the CISA KEV catalog at time of analysis.
OS command injection in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets a malicious or compromised OCPP backend server inject arbitrary operating-system commands via the diagnostics URL parameter of an OCPP GetDiagnostics request. A rogue or hijacked charge-point management server can fully compromise the charger, and publicly available exploit code exists (CyberDanube), though no active exploitation has been confirmed. Because the impact reaches the underlying OS with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss, successful attacks give complete control of the charging hardware.
Unauthenticated OS command injection in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets a remote attacker execute arbitrary operating-system commands by supplying crafted input in the 'url' parameter of the /test endpoint on TCP port 9002. The flaw scores CVSS 4.0 10.0 (maximum) with no authentication or user interaction required, and publicly available exploit code exists (research published by CyberDanube), though it is not yet listed in CISA KEV - no public exploit identified as actively exploited at time of analysis beyond the released POC.
Remote code execution in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets unauthenticated attackers run arbitrary code as root by sending a crafted request to the /test endpoint of a service listening on TCP port 9002. The flawed handler fetches, extracts, and executes attacker-supplied files, yielding full device takeover with no authentication or user interaction. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by CyberDanube) and the CVSS 4.0 score is 10.0; the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Authentication bypass in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations running firmware up to and including V1.03.51 lets remote, unauthenticated attackers invoke privileged management endpoints by supplying a hard-coded token baked into the firmware. Because the token is static and shared across devices, anyone who extracts it once (publicly available exploit code exists via CyberDanube) can control the charger's management functions on any unpatched unit. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 10.0, and the flaw affords full compromise of the device with no user interaction.
Authentication bypass via hard-coded backdoor accounts in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets remote attackers gain administrative control of the web management interface. Two undocumented privileged accounts use a vendor-defined password derivation tied to device-specific values, so anyone who knows the algorithm and inputs can authenticate as admin without legitimate credentials. Publicly available exploit code exists (CyberDanube); no public evidence of active exploitation at time of analysis.
Physical firmware compromise in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets an attacker with hands-on access exploit exposed NXP i.MX6 hardware recovery pins to boot unsigned, attacker-controlled code into memory. Once in recovery mode the attacker can dump, modify, or replace the device firmware and extract sensitive data such as credentials, keys, or configuration. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by CyberDanube), though there is no public exploit identified as being used in active campaigns and the flaw is not listed in CISA KEV.
Physical compromise of Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations running firmware through V1.03.51 is possible via an unprotected UART interface that lets an attacker halt boot and drop into the U-Boot bootloader. From the bootloader an attacker can rewrite boot configuration or the filesystem to gain full operating-system access on the charger. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by CyberDanube), though there is no public exploit identified as being used in active attacks and the flaw requires physical access.
Remote code execution and denial of service in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations running firmware through V1.03.51 stems from a heap-based buffer overflow in the set_ap_param command exposed by the /localcfg endpoint. An authenticated attacker who can reach the device's local configuration interface can send oversized input to crash the charger or potentially execute arbitrary code on it. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by CyberDanube), and the CVSS 4.0 base score is 9.4, though there is no evidence of active exploitation in the CISA KEV catalog at time of analysis.
OS command injection in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets a malicious or compromised OCPP backend server inject arbitrary operating-system commands via the diagnostics URL parameter of an OCPP GetDiagnostics request. A rogue or hijacked charge-point management server can fully compromise the charger, and publicly available exploit code exists (CyberDanube), though no active exploitation has been confirmed. Because the impact reaches the underlying OS with full confidentiality, integrity, and availability loss, successful attacks give complete control of the charging hardware.
Unauthenticated OS command injection in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets a remote attacker execute arbitrary operating-system commands by supplying crafted input in the 'url' parameter of the /test endpoint on TCP port 9002. The flaw scores CVSS 4.0 10.0 (maximum) with no authentication or user interaction required, and publicly available exploit code exists (research published by CyberDanube), though it is not yet listed in CISA KEV - no public exploit identified as actively exploited at time of analysis beyond the released POC.
Remote code execution in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets unauthenticated attackers run arbitrary code as root by sending a crafted request to the /test endpoint of a service listening on TCP port 9002. The flawed handler fetches, extracts, and executes attacker-supplied files, yielding full device takeover with no authentication or user interaction. Publicly available exploit code exists (published by CyberDanube) and the CVSS 4.0 score is 10.0; the vulnerability is not currently listed in CISA KEV.
Authentication bypass in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations running firmware up to and including V1.03.51 lets remote, unauthenticated attackers invoke privileged management endpoints by supplying a hard-coded token baked into the firmware. Because the token is static and shared across devices, anyone who extracts it once (publicly available exploit code exists via CyberDanube) can control the charger's management functions on any unpatched unit. The CVSS 4.0 base score is 10.0, and the flaw affords full compromise of the device with no user interaction.
Authentication bypass via hard-coded backdoor accounts in Autel MaxiCharger Single EV charging stations (firmware through V1.03.51) lets remote attackers gain administrative control of the web management interface. Two undocumented privileged accounts use a vendor-defined password derivation tied to device-specific values, so anyone who knows the algorithm and inputs can authenticate as admin without legitimate credentials. Publicly available exploit code exists (CyberDanube); no public evidence of active exploitation at time of analysis.